LLM Mart Basic

Use when the user wants documentation written or updated — docstrings, API docs, a README section, or a doc comment on a tricky piece of code. Documents selectively: what a reader genuinely can't infer from the code, and nothing they can. Writes prose, not code changes. Also know

Use when the user wants lint, format, and type errors fixed in the current changes. Reads CLAUDE.md for the repo's lint/format/type-check commands, runs each, and fixes only style/format/type issues — no behavior changes. Also known as `klaussy-fix`.

Use when the user is tired of approving the same routine dev work ("stop asking me yes", "allow the normal dev tools", "grant permissions"). Detects the repo's stack and writes a curated allow-list into the agent's own local permission file so the basics stop prompting — reading,

Use whenever prose, a comment, a doc, a PR or commit body, or a file's text should read like a human engineer wrote it instead of an AI — "humanize this", "make it sound less like a bot", "does this read AI-written?", or before shipping prose a human will read. Rewrites in four p

Use when the user pastes a ticket, design doc, or task description and wants it implemented. Multi-phase flow — understand, investigate (in plan mode), plan, implement, verify. Enforces strict scope rules and writes failing tests first for bug fixes. Also known as `klaussy-implem

Use when the user wants a new git worktree created for a task. Picks a kebab-case branch name with a fix/feat/chore/docs/refactor prefix, runs `git worktree add` from the configured base branch, and reports the new path. Also known as `klaussy-new-worktree`.

Use when the user wants a plan for a non-trivial task in this repo. Runs discovery, parallel exploration of the codebase, clarifying questions and parallel architectures, then checks the plan against the requirements and against the repo itself (an adversarial sub-agent) before w

Use when reviewing a staged diff or an about-to-commit/push change for last-mile issues — silent failures, leaked secrets, debug leftovers, blatant correctness landmines, and excessive/narrating comments. Reports findings on the changed lines only; it does not refactor or rewrite

Use when the user wants the current change QA'd and PR-ready evidence captured. Classifies the diff and runs the verification that actually fits it — screen recordings and screenshots for UI/frontend changes, endpoint or e2e runs for backend, command output for a CLI, tests for a

Use when the user wants to restructure code while preserving behavior exactly. Establishes a passing test baseline first, then makes incremental moves that each leave the suite green. Refuses to change behavior and structure in the same step. Also known as `klaussy-refactor`.

Use when the user wants to cut a release — bump the version, update the changelog from conventional commits, and tag. Detects where the version lives, derives the next version from the commits since the last tag, and stages the release locally; it does not push or publish unless

Use when the user hands you a task definition and wants the ENTIRE development loop run end-to-end — plan, implement, review and fix, QA the change with evidence appropriate to it, open a humanized PR, then poll CI and code review, fixing and resolving until the PR is green and c

Use when the user has a stack of dependent branches or PRs that needs rebasing — the base branch moved, the bottom branch merged, or a mid-stack branch was amended. Derives the parent/child chain from git ancestry, rebases each branch onto its new parent, and force-pushes with a

Use when the user wants a thorough PR or branch review. Triages by diff size — small PRs get a single-pass review, large PRs fan out to parallel sub-agents (correctness, architecture, security, scope, and an Agentic & Evals lens that activates on AI/agent code) with a validation

Use when the user wants to run, start, or launch this project's app — to watch a change work end-to-end, reproduce behavior in the real app, or smoke-test locally. Finds the run command from CLAUDE.md and drives the app; it does not write features or fix bugs. Also known as `klau

Use when the user wants a focused security pass over the current change — scanning the branch diff for leaked secrets, injection and SSRF, broken access control, unsafe deserialization, and newly added or vulnerable dependencies. Narrower and deeper than the general review skill:

Use right before declaring an implementation done — a last-pass review of your OWN uncommitted change against a fixed checklist (reuse, stdlib, comments, dead code, tests, scope). Catches the things that make a diff read as AI-written before a human ever sees it. Reviews the curr

Use when the user explicitly wants to turn clean, human prose INTO maximal AI slop — as a joke, a demo of what AI tells look like, or to stress-test the humanize skill by feeding it the worst input imaginable. The evil twin of humanize — it adds every tell humanize strips. For la

Use when a change is too large to review in one pass and should ship as a stack of dependent PRs instead. Strips comment bloat so the size is honest, proposes layers from the import graph, then builds the branch chain, opens one request per layer targeting the layer below, and re

Use when the user wants tests written for current changes (uncommitted diff or recent feature). Matches the repo's existing test framework, fixtures, and assertion style. Covers happy path, edge cases, and error paths without over-mocking. Also known as `klaussy-test`.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

`crabbox shard` forks a [checkpoint](checkpoint.md) into `--count` leases

`crabbox share` grants other people access to an existing lease through the

`crabbox ssh` resolves a lease and prints a ready-to-run `ssh` command for it.

`crabbox status` prints the current state of a lease: its slug, provider,

`crabbox stop` ends a single lease. For coordinator-backed and direct cloud

`crabbox sync-plan` prints the local sync manifest and its size hotspots

`crabbox tunnel` opens one foreground SSH local port-forward to a resolved

`crabbox unshare` removes sharing rules from a coordinator-backed lease. It is

`crabbox usage` reports lease cost and usage estimates from the broker, broken down by user, organization, or the whole fleet.

`crabbox verify` checks a signed run receipt produced by `crabbox run --attest`.

`crabbox vnc` prints (or opens) the connection details for a desktop-capable

`crabbox warmup` leases a box and waits until it is ready: it provisions (or

`crabbox watch` runs a command on a warm lease, then watches the local

Linux portal viewers default to **Match window**: only the connected controller

`crabbox whoami` calls the broker's `/v1/whoami` endpoint and prints the

Vet a new or changed third-party dependency for license, provenance, and supply-chain risk before any install runs.

Inspect ADR health read-only; optionally select one ADR with --adr N.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:decision-lifecycle}}

Assemble the governance record for a range — commits, overrides, ADRs, sprint auto-decisions, open questions, checkpoint findings — into one dated audit packet. Read-only.

Lightweight Q&A about the project — answer from context and return, no routing, no state change.

MCP server for reusable prompt templates, multi-step workflow chains, and quality gates. Compose agentic workflows with an operator syntax; export as native ski…

中国股票数据基础设施，覆盖行情、研报、资金面、筹码、公告、龙虎榜、ETF/期权、舆情互动、基本面、行业板块、宏观与风险事件等核心数据。42+A股数据集，日更、自托管、MCP 原生，零注册、零 API Token

OKF (Open Knowledge Format): Durable, structured memory for AI agents. Author, validate, consume, and maintain portable knowledge bundles through an ecosystem o…

토스증권을 AI 에이전트와 터미널에서 다루는 도구. CLI 와 MCP 서버로 계좌·시세·주문은 물론 웹앱 전용 기능(수급·AI 시그널·스크리너·배당)까지, JSON·CSV 구조화 출력으로 AI 도구·자동화에 바로 연동.

Claude skills for LinkedIn. 11 Claude Code and Codex skills that write human-sounding LinkedIn posts, craft comments that get noticed, analyze your feed, and bu…

MCP server connecting AI agents to ITASCA engines (PFC, FLAC, 3DEC, MPoint, MassFlow) — run geotechnical & geomechanics simulations through natural conversation

A curated list of amazingly awesome articles, people, applications, software libraries and projects related to the knowledge management space

One local dashboard for every Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Antigravity, and Kilo Code session on your Mac. Spawn in parallel, ship in parallel. Open source, MIT.

Building blocks for frontier OpenAI agents in Rust. Nanocodex empowers you with Codex-level performance anywhere.

The AI agent that lives in your framework/browser

Self-Programming AI Assistant. Capture, automate, and refine all your workflows.

Consider it done. The open-source AI agent that works out of the box · 想到，就能做到。开源、开箱即用的 AI Agent。

Make Any Website into CLI & Use your logged-in browser by AI agent.

ISO 24495 Plain Language skills and Claude Code plugin

Deterministic, fail-open tool routing for Hermes Agent with an optional local-model fallback.

1인 사업가 생산성 키트 — 직원 없이 49개를 자동화했고, 그중 바로 쓸 수 있는 AI 에이전트 스킬 26개(+실행 스크립트)를 공개합니다

AI Agents & MCPs & AI Workflow Automation • (~400 MCP servers for AI agents) • AI Automation / AI Agent with MCPs • AI Workflows & AI Agents • MCPs for AI Agent…

The open-source, self-hosted video conferencing software. Scalable, customizable, and with a powerful AI Meeting Agent.

Business operating system for Claude Code — 57 skills, 21 agents, smart daemon. Unified inbox (WhatsApp/Email/Slack/Telegram), autonomous PR merge, full-AWS mon…

A local-first, cross-platform Electron desktop workspace for Pi Coding Agent, with sessions, project files, browser tools, skills, plugins, and messaging integr…