LLM Mart Basic

Use when the user wants documentation written or updated — docstrings, API docs, a README section, or a doc comment on a tricky piece of code. Documents selectively: what a reader genuinely can't infer from the code, and nothing they can. Writes prose, not code changes. Also know

Use when the user wants lint, format, and type errors fixed in the current changes. Reads CLAUDE.md for the repo's lint/format/type-check commands, runs each, and fixes only style/format/type issues — no behavior changes. Also known as `klaussy-fix`.

Use when the user is tired of approving the same routine dev work ("stop asking me yes", "allow the normal dev tools", "grant permissions"). Detects the repo's stack and writes a curated allow-list into the agent's own local permission file so the basics stop prompting — reading,

Use whenever prose, a comment, a doc, a PR or commit body, or a file's text should read like a human engineer wrote it instead of an AI — "humanize this", "make it sound less like a bot", "does this read AI-written?", or before shipping prose a human will read. Rewrites in four p

Use when the user pastes a ticket, design doc, or task description and wants it implemented. Multi-phase flow — understand, investigate (in plan mode), plan, implement, verify. Enforces strict scope rules and writes failing tests first for bug fixes. Also known as `klaussy-implem

Use when the user wants a new git worktree created for a task. Picks a kebab-case branch name with a fix/feat/chore/docs/refactor prefix, runs `git worktree add` from the configured base branch, and reports the new path. Also known as `klaussy-new-worktree`.

Use when the user wants a plan for a non-trivial task in this repo. Runs discovery, parallel exploration of the codebase, clarifying questions and parallel architectures, then checks the plan against the requirements and against the repo itself (an adversarial sub-agent) before w

Use when reviewing a staged diff or an about-to-commit/push change for last-mile issues — silent failures, leaked secrets, debug leftovers, blatant correctness landmines, and excessive/narrating comments. Reports findings on the changed lines only; it does not refactor or rewrite

Use when the user wants the current change QA'd and PR-ready evidence captured. Classifies the diff and runs the verification that actually fits it — screen recordings and screenshots for UI/frontend changes, endpoint or e2e runs for backend, command output for a CLI, tests for a

Use when the user wants to restructure code while preserving behavior exactly. Establishes a passing test baseline first, then makes incremental moves that each leave the suite green. Refuses to change behavior and structure in the same step. Also known as `klaussy-refactor`.

Use when the user wants to cut a release — bump the version, update the changelog from conventional commits, and tag. Detects where the version lives, derives the next version from the commits since the last tag, and stages the release locally; it does not push or publish unless

Use when the user hands you a task definition and wants the ENTIRE development loop run end-to-end — plan, implement, review and fix, QA the change with evidence appropriate to it, open a humanized PR, then poll CI and code review, fixing and resolving until the PR is green and c

Use when the user has a stack of dependent branches or PRs that needs rebasing — the base branch moved, the bottom branch merged, or a mid-stack branch was amended. Derives the parent/child chain from git ancestry, rebases each branch onto its new parent, and force-pushes with a

Use when the user wants a thorough PR or branch review. Triages by diff size — small PRs get a single-pass review, large PRs fan out to parallel sub-agents (correctness, architecture, security, scope, and an Agentic & Evals lens that activates on AI/agent code) with a validation

Use when the user wants to run, start, or launch this project's app — to watch a change work end-to-end, reproduce behavior in the real app, or smoke-test locally. Finds the run command from CLAUDE.md and drives the app; it does not write features or fix bugs. Also known as `klau

Use when the user wants a focused security pass over the current change — scanning the branch diff for leaked secrets, injection and SSRF, broken access control, unsafe deserialization, and newly added or vulnerable dependencies. Narrower and deeper than the general review skill:

Use right before declaring an implementation done — a last-pass review of your OWN uncommitted change against a fixed checklist (reuse, stdlib, comments, dead code, tests, scope). Catches the things that make a diff read as AI-written before a human ever sees it. Reviews the curr

Use when the user explicitly wants to turn clean, human prose INTO maximal AI slop — as a joke, a demo of what AI tells look like, or to stress-test the humanize skill by feeding it the worst input imaginable. The evil twin of humanize — it adds every tell humanize strips. For la

Use when a change is too large to review in one pass and should ship as a stack of dependent PRs instead. Strips comment bloat so the size is honest, proposes layers from the import graph, then builds the branch chain, opens one request per layer targeting the layer below, and re

Use when the user wants tests written for current changes (uncommitted diff or recent feature). Matches the repo's existing test framework, fixtures, and assertion style. Covers happy path, edge cases, and error paths without over-mocking. Also known as `klaussy-test`.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Instrument services with structured logging, Prometheus metrics, and OpenTelemetry tracing. Build Grafana dashboards, write Prometheus alerting rules, run k6 load tests, and plan infrastructure capacity.

Generate, test, validate, explain, and debug OPA (Open Policy Agent) Rego policies and Conftest configurations. Covers deny/warn/violation rules, unit tests, regal linting, conftest fmt, namespace design, input shape analysis, and GitHub Actions integration. Use when asked to "write a policy", "test a rego file", "validate policies", "explain this rego", or "why is my policy not firing".

OpenShift SCC diagnosis and hardening, Route TLS patterns, OpenShift GitOps app delivery, and cluster upgrade validation.

Comprehensive PR review across six dimensions — cost impact, environment drift, ownership gaps, SOC 2 compliance, deprecated API / version hygiene, and rollback feasibility. Each mode inspects the diff and current file state, reports findings with severity, and recommends concrete fixes. Use when preparing a PR for merge, conducting a pre-deployment readiness check, or performing a post-merge risk assessment.

Production-readiness preflight check for a directory, repo, or single file. Auto-detects file types (Kubernetes manifests, Terraform, GitHub Actions workflows, Helm values/charts, Flux Kustomizations/HelmReleases, Dockerfiles, shell scripts) and applies type-specific checks across the whole scope. Returns a per-file summary table and aggregated verdict. Use before deploying, merging, or applying a folder of config. For PR diffs spanning multiple files use /platform-skills:pr-review instead. For deep Helm chart work use /platform-skills:helmchart instead.

Apply product thinking to platform work — DevEx audits, friction analysis, RFC/ADR drafting, incident communication, post-mortems, capacity planning, cost optimisation, and platform health review.

Generate renovate.json covering all dependency file types used in a repo, emit a GitHub Actions workflow that validates renovate.json on every PR, or generate a pre-commit hook for local validation.

Detect and respond to in-container threats at the syscall level using Falco (eBPF-based, CNCF, open-source, no license cost). Covers Falco installation on EKS/GKE with eBPF driver, custom rule authoring, alert routing via Falcosidekick, rule debugging, and bridging Falco runtime signals to Kyverno admission enforcement. Use when asked to "detect privilege escalation in containers", "set up runtime threat detection", "write a Falco rule", "route Falco alerts to Slack", or "debug why my Falco rule is not firing".

Secrets strategy, External Secrets Operator scaffolding, Sealed Secrets seal/rotate/backup, rotation runbooks, and Kubernetes-side secrets audit.

Bootstrap and operate a self-improving agent workspace. Scaffolds .learnings/ and memory/ directories, captures errors and learnings during a session, detects recurring patterns, recalls verified lessons, and promotes stable entries to scoped rule files (.claude/rules/ or ~/.claude/rules/). Also implements the Proactive Agent pillars — WAL protocol, working buffer, SESSION-STATE, daily notes, VBR, VFM scoring, ADL decision logic, heartbeat, and reverse prompting. Use when asked to "remember this lesson", "set up agent memory", "log that error", "what did we learn about X", "promote learnings", "revoke that rule", "capture session state", or "enable proactive mode".

Scaffold a multi-agent AI setup for any repo. Scans the codebase, interviews the developer, generates agent configs for whichever AI tools the repo uses (Copilot, Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Windsurf). Use when asked to "set up agents", "scaffold Copilot agents", or "create an AGENTS.md".

Secure the software supply chain from source to running container. Covers Cosign keyless image signing (Sigstore/Rekor), SBOM generation and attestation (Syft), vulnerability scanning with severity gates (Trivy/Grype), SLSA Level 2 provenance, and Kyverno/OPA admission enforcement. All open-source, no license cost. Use when asked to "sign my image", "generate an SBOM", "scan for CVEs", "attest build provenance", "enforce image signatures in Kubernetes", or "implement SLSA".

Runs through the full Terraform validation pipeline — fmt, validate, tflint, security scan — and reviews a module or plan for blast radius, IAM risk, and state impact.

Triages a PR comment — from a bot (Copilot, CI) or a human reviewer. Routes to the `triage_helper.py` helper for identity checks, thread snapshotting, isolated-worktree fixes, and publish/reply/resolve mechanics; you classify the finding and apply a justified fix. `--dry-run` is fully read-only (investigation and a printed plan, zero mutations). `--no-resolve` runs the full fix/reply workflow but never resolves a thread. Run from inside the repo.

Scan container images, filesystems, git repos, and existing SBOMs for CVEs, secrets, and license violations using Trivy. Covers local CLI, CI severity gates with SARIF upload, and continuous monitoring via Trivy Operator (Flux HelmRelease). Use when asked to "scan my image", "check for CVEs", "scan this repo for secrets", "scan an SBOM", or "set up continuous cluster vulnerability monitoring". IaC misconfig → /platform-skills:checkov. Admission posture → /platform-skills:kyverno. Image signing/SBOM generation → /platform-skills:supply-chain.

Audit GitHub Actions workflows, composite actions, Dependabot configs, and pre-commit configs for security findings using zizmor — template injection, credential persistence, unpinned uses, over-broad permissions, impostor commits. Covers local CLI, auto-fix, zizmor.yml policy, severity-based CI gates, SARIF upload, and pre-commit. Use when asked to "audit my workflows", "run zizmor", "is this workflow safe", "check for template injection", "pin my actions", or "set up a zizmor CI gate". Workflow syntax and shell errors → /platform-skills:github-actions (actionlint). IaC misconfig → /platform-skills:checkov. Image and dependency CVEs → /platform-skills:trivy. Keeping SHA pins fresh → /platform-skills:renovate.

반복 작업을 `/이름` 으로 호출. 파일명 = 커맨드 이름(`fix-issue.md` → `/fix-issue`).

이슈 #$ARGUMENTS 를 처리한다(이슈 우선 워크플로):

AGENTS.md 생태계(rules·memory·agents·skills·commands·workflows)의 연결 구조를

이슈/기획서 기준 SDLC 한 사이클(이슈→개발→테스트→검증→PR/MR)을 사람 개입 없이 자동 실행.

Claude Code skills for Chinese-narration recaps from supported video files, with optional editable JianYing/CapCut draft export. | 用 Claude Code skills 为支持的视频文件…

Drive the Unity Editor from an AI agent or the terminal. The Editor serves MCP itself over HTTP, so there is no second process to run, and the isuzu-unity-cli c…

面向企业的数字员工构建与运行平台：把专业员工的经验、流程与判断标准，固化为可随时上岗、可配置、可审批、可观测的 AI 数字员工。

A local-first, Pi-powered AI agent workspace for Desktop, WebUI, and CLI

660+ muapi-hosted generative-media models plus community-submitted third-party API tools (SEO, enrichment, social, scraping) — one YAML file per entry, browsabl…

A compounding agent OS for recursive agents. Also an open source alternative to Grok Bot and Meta's Muse.

Independent desktop client for OpenCode 2. Manage projects, sessions, parallel agents, requests, and changes on Linux and macOS.

Production agent skills for Claude Code, Cursor, and any SKILL.md harness — Codex fleets, video pipeline, monorepo review bundles, multi-chain explorer.

See and manage what your coding assistants load — skills, commands, subagents, plugins and MCP servers, with real usage.

An Enterprise-Grade Full-Stack RBAC Permission Management System Built with Go + React

Create AI Agents in a No-Code Visual Builder or TypeScript SDK with full 2-way sync. For shipping AI assistants and multi-agent AI workflows.

基于 DeepSeek Harness（DSH）的稳定桌面端，集成Git、内置浏览器与记忆功能 | DeepSeek Harness desktop GUI with local workspaces, Git, browser and memory.

⚡ Control Apache Airflow with natural language via MCP. Chat with your workflows using Claude, GPT, or any LLM — no REST API calls needed. Supports Airflow 2.x…

Open-source CLI, schemas, resolver, and DSH agent tools for DSH Plugin Hub

Pi Coding Agent 中文学习蓝皮书：从安装与第一个可验收任务开始，逐步掌握 Session、Context、Skill、Extension、Subagent 与长期 Agent 工作流。

Self-hosted framework for orchestrating fleets of specialist AI agents — ensemble reasoning and a full agentic coding pipeline, model-agnostic and local-friendl…

Self-hosted, vendor-neutral control plane for your local coding agents (Claude Code & Codex). Run your agents, on any plane.

A practical AI agents handbook covering agent systems, agentic workflows, LangGraph, MCP/A2A, context engineering, agent memory, evaluation, observability, and…

Vibe Coding 从入门到精通教程｜AI 结对编程工作流｜Prompt、Skill、Workflow、上下文管理、codex实战指南

Static security scanner for LLM agents — prompt injection, MCP config auditing, taint analysis. 51 rules mapped to OWASP Agentic Top 10 (2026). Works with LangC…