LLM Mart Basic

Flutter Riverpod app architecture and Windows installer delivery. Use before changing a Riverpod Flutter app/package or its Windows desktop packaging/update pipeline; skip non-Riverpod stacks and pure-Dart work.

Review PR, branch, commit or working-tree changes for concrete defects and fidelity to intended behavior. Also use when explicitly asked to independently challenge a prepared plan, diagnosis or verification claim.

Design or review module ownership, public interfaces and abstractions; UI token/component ownership; or domain-driven models, bounded contexts and invariants. Use for structural decisions, not routine edits within an established owner.

Prove real user journeys across browser, mobile, desktop, API and CLI surfaces using the project's existing test tools. Use for end-to-end verification, runtime UI review or requested visual proof.

Apply Hard Eng's planning, project context, verification and gate-adaptation guidance when implementing or reviewing code in an installed project.

Implement and verify a ready, authorized plan through focused fixes and integrated checks, ending with a ready-for-ship handoff. Use for implementation, bug fixes or resuming build work; skip planning-only, review-only and shipping-only requests.

Prevent verified repeated failures and preserve lasting decisions in terse ADRs. Use when failures recur, prevention needs strengthening, or accepted decisions and steering need durable capture; skip ordinary one-off fixes and routine task updates.

Plan a change before implementation, resolve material user decisions and prepare repository-grounded UX references. Use a compact plan for small changes; route large, unclear efforts or explicit Wayfinder requests to Wayfinder. Skip explanation-only requests and execution already

Deliver a verified build through a task branch and PR, check the intended remote result, and clean up the completed task safely. Use for PR creation, shipping, merging or release/deployment requests; skip planning, implementation and review-only work.

Make a voiced product marketing or explainer video from real product screens. Script, cut walkthrough clips or stage app screenshots with a cursor, pick voice takes, render branded motion graphics and diagrams, mix music and review every second before delivery.

Investigate a codebase, compare tools or approaches, verify current external or library facts, and research failures before making a substantive technical recommendation. Use for sufficiency and gap reviews; ordinary edits with settled requirements do not need a research stage.

Review authorized application code, configuration, designs or artifacts for concrete authorization, data exposure, injection, secret, dependency and LLM/tool security risks. Use for a requested security review or a change affecting a trust boundary.

Write, revise or review an agent skill (SKILL.md package).

Use when explaining System V AMD64, ARM AAPCS, RISC-V psABI, stack frames, variadic calls, or FFI register rules. Not for the Rust FFI binding layer: use rust-ffi.

Use when the user wants to classify abstractions as useful, bad, or busy and keep one shallow level. Not for tasks requiring source or remote-system changes.

Use when configuring ADC sampling time, DMA-driven ADC, calibration, or DAC channel setup on bare-metal MCUs. Not for the DMA stream itself: use dma-baremetal.

Use when creating AF_XDP sockets, configuring UMEM and XSK rings, writing an XDP redirect program, or choosing copy versus zero-copy mode. Not for full kernel bypass: use dpdk.

Use when a completed session needs an agent-environment retrospective. Not for an engineering retrospective from telemetry: use engineering-retrospective.

Use when asked to audit or repair agent surfaces (plugins, agents, skills, CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md, docs, prompts, commands, hooks) or improve one skill at depth. Not for agent grading: use skill-doctor.

Use when a redacted, trimmed agent transcript must be appended to a GitHub PR or issue body, with human approval and preview. Not for automated or model-initiated insertion.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Search Clio contacts by name, company, or email

Search or list Clio matters by name/client and status

Capacity forecast for cloud resources, scoped to a resource type or covering everything connected

Cloud cost anomaly and reclaimable-spend report for a given window

Full network health sweep across all connected network-monitoring tools — devices down, degraded links, and topology changes

Report control and configuration drift since the last known-good baseline for a client or the whole portfolio

Build a source-cited compliance evidence package for a client against a named framework

Draft evidence-backed answers to the standard cyber-insurance questionnaire for a client

List computers in ConnectWise Automate with optional filters

Execute a script on an endpoint in ConnectWise Automate

Create a ConnectWise CPQ quote by copying a template or an existing quote

Get a ConnectWise CPQ quote with its tabs, line items, customers, and terms

List ConnectWise CPQ quote templates available to copy

Search ConnectWise CPQ quotes by account, status, or date range

Add an internal or external note to a ConnectWise PSA ticket

View agreement status and entitlements for a company in ConnectWise PSA

Close a ConnectWise PSA ticket with resolution notes

Create a new service ticket in ConnectWise PSA

Retrieve detailed ticket information from ConnectWise PSA

Log a time entry against a ConnectWise PSA ticket

Claude Code skills for Chinese-narration recaps from supported video files, with optional editable JianYing/CapCut draft export. | 用 Claude Code skills 为支持的视频文件…

Drive the Unity Editor from an AI agent or the terminal. The Editor serves MCP itself over HTTP, so there is no second process to run, and the isuzu-unity-cli c…

面向企业的数字员工构建与运行平台：把专业员工的经验、流程与判断标准，固化为可随时上岗、可配置、可审批、可观测的 AI 数字员工。

A local-first, Pi-powered AI agent workspace for Desktop, WebUI, and CLI

660+ muapi-hosted generative-media models plus community-submitted third-party API tools (SEO, enrichment, social, scraping) — one YAML file per entry, browsabl…

A compounding agent OS for recursive agents. Also an open source alternative to Grok Bot and Meta's Muse.

Independent desktop client for OpenCode 2. Manage projects, sessions, parallel agents, requests, and changes on Linux and macOS.

Production agent skills for Claude Code, Cursor, and any SKILL.md harness — Codex fleets, video pipeline, monorepo review bundles, multi-chain explorer.

See and manage what your coding assistants load — skills, commands, subagents, plugins and MCP servers, with real usage.

An Enterprise-Grade Full-Stack RBAC Permission Management System Built with Go + React

Create AI Agents in a No-Code Visual Builder or TypeScript SDK with full 2-way sync. For shipping AI assistants and multi-agent AI workflows.

基于 DeepSeek Harness（DSH）的稳定桌面端，集成Git、内置浏览器与记忆功能 | DeepSeek Harness desktop GUI with local workspaces, Git, browser and memory.

⚡ Control Apache Airflow with natural language via MCP. Chat with your workflows using Claude, GPT, or any LLM — no REST API calls needed. Supports Airflow 2.x…

Open-source CLI, schemas, resolver, and DSH agent tools for DSH Plugin Hub

Pi Coding Agent 中文学习蓝皮书：从安装与第一个可验收任务开始，逐步掌握 Session、Context、Skill、Extension、Subagent 与长期 Agent 工作流。

Self-hosted framework for orchestrating fleets of specialist AI agents — ensemble reasoning and a full agentic coding pipeline, model-agnostic and local-friendl…

Self-hosted, vendor-neutral control plane for your local coding agents (Claude Code & Codex). Run your agents, on any plane.

A practical AI agents handbook covering agent systems, agentic workflows, LangGraph, MCP/A2A, context engineering, agent memory, evaluation, observability, and…

Vibe Coding 从入门到精通教程｜AI 结对编程工作流｜Prompt、Skill、Workflow、上下文管理、codex实战指南

Static security scanner for LLM agents — prompt injection, MCP config auditing, taint analysis. 51 rules mapped to OWASP Agentic Top 10 (2026). Works with LangC…