LLM Mart Basic

Flutter Riverpod app architecture and Windows installer delivery. Use before changing a Riverpod Flutter app/package or its Windows desktop packaging/update pipeline; skip non-Riverpod stacks and pure-Dart work.

Review PR, branch, commit or working-tree changes for concrete defects and fidelity to intended behavior. Also use when explicitly asked to independently challenge a prepared plan, diagnosis or verification claim.

Design or review module ownership, public interfaces and abstractions; UI token/component ownership; or domain-driven models, bounded contexts and invariants. Use for structural decisions, not routine edits within an established owner.

Prove real user journeys across browser, mobile, desktop, API and CLI surfaces using the project's existing test tools. Use for end-to-end verification, runtime UI review or requested visual proof.

Apply Hard Eng's planning, project context, verification and gate-adaptation guidance when implementing or reviewing code in an installed project.

Implement and verify a ready, authorized plan through focused fixes and integrated checks, ending with a ready-for-ship handoff. Use for implementation, bug fixes or resuming build work; skip planning-only, review-only and shipping-only requests.

Prevent verified repeated failures and preserve lasting decisions in terse ADRs. Use when failures recur, prevention needs strengthening, or accepted decisions and steering need durable capture; skip ordinary one-off fixes and routine task updates.

Plan a change before implementation, resolve material user decisions and prepare repository-grounded UX references. Use a compact plan for small changes; route large, unclear efforts or explicit Wayfinder requests to Wayfinder. Skip explanation-only requests and execution already

Deliver a verified build through a task branch and PR, check the intended remote result, and clean up the completed task safely. Use for PR creation, shipping, merging or release/deployment requests; skip planning, implementation and review-only work.

Make a voiced product marketing or explainer video from real product screens. Script, cut walkthrough clips or stage app screenshots with a cursor, pick voice takes, render branded motion graphics and diagrams, mix music and review every second before delivery.

Investigate a codebase, compare tools or approaches, verify current external or library facts, and research failures before making a substantive technical recommendation. Use for sufficiency and gap reviews; ordinary edits with settled requirements do not need a research stage.

Review authorized application code, configuration, designs or artifacts for concrete authorization, data exposure, injection, secret, dependency and LLM/tool security risks. Use for a requested security review or a change affecting a trust boundary.

Write, revise or review an agent skill (SKILL.md package).

Use when explaining System V AMD64, ARM AAPCS, RISC-V psABI, stack frames, variadic calls, or FFI register rules. Not for the Rust FFI binding layer: use rust-ffi.

Use when the user wants to classify abstractions as useful, bad, or busy and keep one shallow level. Not for tasks requiring source or remote-system changes.

Use when configuring ADC sampling time, DMA-driven ADC, calibration, or DAC channel setup on bare-metal MCUs. Not for the DMA stream itself: use dma-baremetal.

Use when creating AF_XDP sockets, configuring UMEM and XSK rings, writing an XDP redirect program, or choosing copy versus zero-copy mode. Not for full kernel bypass: use dpdk.

Use when a completed session needs an agent-environment retrospective. Not for an engineering retrospective from telemetry: use engineering-retrospective.

Use when asked to audit or repair agent surfaces (plugins, agents, skills, CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md, docs, prompts, commands, hooks) or improve one skill at depth. Not for agent grading: use skill-doctor.

Use when a redacted, trimmed agent transcript must be appended to a GitHub PR or issue body, with human approval and preview. Not for automated or model-initiated insertion.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Implement issues (GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket) using progressive analyze-specify-plan-implement workflow

Address PR/MR review feedback by reading comments, implementing fixes, and resolving threads. GitHub and GitLab support.

Retrospective analysis and improvement of workflow components with self-evolving patterns

Fix broken functionality from pasted error output, stack traces, or

Summarize recent git history since a baseline with structured analysis of what changed, why, and what to watch for.

Consolidate ephemeral LLM-generated markdown into permanent documentation.

Review pull requests with scope validation, code analysis, and line comments. Supports GitHub PRs and GitLab MRs.

Prepare a PR end-to-end by updating documentation, running tests, dogfooding checks, and validating with code review.

Batch-resolve unresolved PR/MR review threads via GraphQL API (GitHub/GitLab)

Detect and fix drift between plugin.json registrations and capabilities reference documentation

Update pre-commit hooks and CI/CD workflows based on recent project changes

Scan and update dependencies across all ecosystems with conflict detection

Update project documentation with consolidation, debloating, AI slop detection, capabilities sync, and accuracy verification.

Audit and sync plugin.json registrations with actual disk contents. Detects missing or stale skills, commands, agents, hooks.

Review and update test coverage using TDD/BDD methodology with quality validation. Generates tests for changed code.

Generate or update tutorials with VHS and Playwright recordings

Bump project versions using git-workspace-review and version-updates skills.

Generate and self-execute a diff-derived test plan for a PR. Reads

Generate new documentation with human-quality writing.

Clean up AI-generated content and improve documentation quality.

Ultra-lightweight, open-source, self-hosted personal AI agent framework in Python with WebUI, tools, memory, MCP, multi-agent workflows, automation, and chat ap…

Governance framework for AI coding agents. It runs them through a five-step workflow (plan, build, review, test, ship) where no step counts as done without evid…

Ultimate Multi-Agent OS for Autonomous AI NPCs 2026

Personal AI Agent Hub 2026 — Build Your 24/7 Autonomous Assistant

Proven 2026 Multi-Agent AI Review System – Verdict-Driven Quality Control

Slash API Batch: Cut AI Costs by 50% in 2026

Web dashboard for Hermes Agent — multi-platform AI chat, session management, scheduled jobs, usage analytics

Agent Skills for Solopreneurs

AirLLM dramatically reduces inference memory usage, letting 70B large language models run on a single 4GB GPU card

Zero, your trustworthy AI teammate for real work.

一套 DSH runtime，Desktop、Web 与 TUI 三种开发体验。

Open-source operational advisor for ClickHouse — real-time monitoring plus AI-driven index/partition/materialized-view recommendations.

⚙️ TypeScript Style Guide and Agent Skill. A concise set of conventions and best practices for consistent, maintainable code.

Framework for AI agents to build and maintain a digital brain through Obsidian wiki

Apache Maka (Incubating) is a local-first AI agent workspace. Model messages, tool calls, tool results, permission decisions, and termination events are recorde…

Neo.mjs is a self-evolving software organism: a professional end-to-end AI engineering team whose cross-model swarm inhabits live apps via Neural Link, Active H…

Agentic development harness for Claude Code — SPEC-driven plan/run/sync, TRUST 5 quality gates, model+effort routing, and Claude×GLM multi-LLM cost control. Sin…

NocoBase is an open-source AI + no-code platform for building business systems fast. Instead of generating everything from scratch, AI works on top of productio…

An open-source AI coding agent that lives in your terminal.

PawWork — free, open-source desktop AI agent for macOS and Windows. Alternative to Codex App and Claude Cowork. BYOK with 75+ providers, ChatGPT OAuth, local mo…