A rules file asks your agent to behave. Agentic OS checks that it did — leaked secrets and a green check over zero tests fail your git hooks and CI; a skipped review or phase shows up when the validator reads the work trail. Backstops you control, not the agent's own word.
A governance-first layer for AI coding agents — guardrails and a gated workflow for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Copilot, Antigravity, or any Markdown-reading agent.
·
繁體中文 ·
Contributing ·
Changelog
It checks the evidence behind what your AI coding agent claims — secrets, tests, reviews — through your git hooks and CI. Here's a gate firing:
The /bootstrap, /review, and /ship above are plain text prompts — your agent maps them to the workflow files in the repo, so they run the same in Cursor or Codex as in Claude Code.
Or run a gate yourself, no install — the credential scan that catches a leaked key before it reaches git history:
bash demo/run.sh # Windows (PowerShell): pwsh demo/run.ps1
Full terminal output
An AI agent wrote this file and reported: "Done — config added."
----------------------------------------------------------------
DB_HOST=prod.internal
aws_access_key_id = AKIA****************
----------------------------------------------------------------
Without a gate, that commit lands and the key is in git history forever.
Agentic OS runs this before the commit is allowed:
$ scan_credentials.py config.env
CREDENTIAL PATTERN(S) DETECTED (values redacted):
config.env:2: aws-access-key-id
Rotate the exposed secret, remove it from the change, then retry.
Commit BLOCKED. The agent said "done"; the machine said no — and it
redacted the value instead of echoing your secret back at you.
No comments yet.