LLM Mart Basic

Use this skill when error taxonomy, retries, timeouts, fallback, or recovery design needs an evidence-bounded review before implementation; triggers include error handling design review, failure-path review, and recovery readiness review.

Use this skill when you need evidence-bounded failover-testing analysis and validation preparation; triggers include 故障切换测试 and failover-testing.

Use this skill when you need to investigate intermittent test failures from run history and evidence; triggers include flaky test analysis.

Use this skill when you need to design functional test plans or cases for business flows, UI, data, and integrations; triggers include functional testing and functional test cases.

Use this skill when you need evidence-bounded repeat inputs, version/model/prompt factors, invariants, variance evidence, and comparison boundaries; triggers include LLM 一致性 and LLM consistency.

Use this skill when you need to design LLM evaluation datasets, judges, metrics, and human-review boundaries; triggers include llm evaluation design.

Use this skill when you need evidence-bounded claim-to-source relations, unsupported assertions, abstention, uncertainty, and evidence review; triggers include LLM 幻觉 and LLM hallucination.

Use this skill when you need to test LLM behavior, failure modes, and evidence-based quality boundaries; triggers include llm testing.

Use this skill when you need to analyze logs into evidence, timelines, anomalies, and follow-up hypotheses; triggers include log analysis.

Use this skill when you need to plan manual or exploratory testing with charters, heuristics, and session records; triggers include manual testing and exploratory testing.

Use this skill when you need to derive test candidates from input transformations and expected relations when a direct oracle is limited; triggers include 变形测试 and metamorphic test design.

Use this skill when you need to identify, contextualize, and investigate metric anomalies from observability evidence; triggers include metrics anomaly analysis.

Use this skill when you need to design mobile test plans for iOS or Android covering functionality, compatibility, performance, network, and security; triggers include mobile testing and app testing.

Use this skill when you need to review mock fidelity, contract alignment, over-mocking, and drift evidence; triggers include Mock 质量评审 and mock quality review.

Use this skill when you need to derive test-path candidates from sourced behavior, state, or process models; triggers include 基于模型的测试 and model-based test design.

Use this skill when you need evidence-bounded delegation, coordination, shared state, conflicts, ownership, termination, and traceability; triggers include 多 Agent 协作 and multi-agent coordination.

Use this skill when you need to interpret mutation operators, killed and survived mutants, and evidence limits; triggers include 变异测试分析 and mutation testing analysis.

Use this skill when you need to discover invalid, denied, failed, degraded, or unsafe-recovery scenarios from product evidence; triggers include negative scenario discovery.

Use this skill when logging, metrics, tracing, alerting, or SLO design needs an evidence-bounded review before implementation; triggers include observability design review, telemetry readiness review, and alert actionability audit.

Use this skill when you need to identify interactions that need at least pairwise coverage after factors, values, and constraints are explicit; triggers include 成对测试 and pairwise test design.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Implement issues (GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket) using progressive analyze-specify-plan-implement workflow

Address PR/MR review feedback by reading comments, implementing fixes, and resolving threads. GitHub and GitLab support.

Retrospective analysis and improvement of workflow components with self-evolving patterns

Fix broken functionality from pasted error output, stack traces, or

Summarize recent git history since a baseline with structured analysis of what changed, why, and what to watch for.

Consolidate ephemeral LLM-generated markdown into permanent documentation.

Review pull requests with scope validation, code analysis, and line comments. Supports GitHub PRs and GitLab MRs.

Prepare a PR end-to-end by updating documentation, running tests, dogfooding checks, and validating with code review.

Batch-resolve unresolved PR/MR review threads via GraphQL API (GitHub/GitLab)

Detect and fix drift between plugin.json registrations and capabilities reference documentation

Update pre-commit hooks and CI/CD workflows based on recent project changes

Scan and update dependencies across all ecosystems with conflict detection

Update project documentation with consolidation, debloating, AI slop detection, capabilities sync, and accuracy verification.

Audit and sync plugin.json registrations with actual disk contents. Detects missing or stale skills, commands, agents, hooks.

Review and update test coverage using TDD/BDD methodology with quality validation. Generates tests for changed code.

Generate or update tutorials with VHS and Playwright recordings

Bump project versions using git-workspace-review and version-updates skills.

Generate and self-execute a diff-derived test plan for a PR. Reads

Generate new documentation with human-quality writing.

Clean up AI-generated content and improve documentation quality.

Ultra-lightweight, open-source, self-hosted personal AI agent framework in Python with WebUI, tools, memory, MCP, multi-agent workflows, automation, and chat ap…

Governance framework for AI coding agents. It runs them through a five-step workflow (plan, build, review, test, ship) where no step counts as done without evid…

Ultimate Multi-Agent OS for Autonomous AI NPCs 2026

Personal AI Agent Hub 2026 — Build Your 24/7 Autonomous Assistant

Proven 2026 Multi-Agent AI Review System – Verdict-Driven Quality Control

Slash API Batch: Cut AI Costs by 50% in 2026

Web dashboard for Hermes Agent — multi-platform AI chat, session management, scheduled jobs, usage analytics

Agent Skills for Solopreneurs

AirLLM dramatically reduces inference memory usage, letting 70B large language models run on a single 4GB GPU card

Zero, your trustworthy AI teammate for real work.

一套 DSH runtime，Desktop、Web 与 TUI 三种开发体验。

Open-source operational advisor for ClickHouse — real-time monitoring plus AI-driven index/partition/materialized-view recommendations.

⚙️ TypeScript Style Guide and Agent Skill. A concise set of conventions and best practices for consistent, maintainable code.

Framework for AI agents to build and maintain a digital brain through Obsidian wiki

Apache Maka (Incubating) is a local-first AI agent workspace. Model messages, tool calls, tool results, permission decisions, and termination events are recorde…

Neo.mjs is a self-evolving software organism: a professional end-to-end AI engineering team whose cross-model swarm inhabits live apps via Neural Link, Active H…

Agentic development harness for Claude Code — SPEC-driven plan/run/sync, TRUST 5 quality gates, model+effort routing, and Claude×GLM multi-LLM cost control. Sin…

NocoBase is an open-source AI + no-code platform for building business systems fast. Instead of generating everything from scratch, AI works on top of productio…

An open-source AI coding agent that lives in your terminal.

PawWork — free, open-source desktop AI agent for macOS and Windows. Alternative to Codex App and Claude Cowork. BYOK with 75+ providers, ChatGPT OAuth, local mo…