LLM Mart Basic

Produce a research report from the vault: scope the question against existing pages, name the gaps, and write findings with citations, disagreements and limits. Use this skill when the user asks for a research report, a deep write-up on a topic, or wants to understand a subject t

Produce a periodic review of a second-brain vault: what was added, which topics are growing, what contradicts what, which questions are still open, and what is worth reading next. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a weekly or monthly review, asks what changed in their vau

Clean a raw transcript before ingestion: punctuate, paragraph, label speakers, fix mistranscribed technical terms, and split long recordings by topic. Use this skill when the user drops an auto-generated transcript, subtitle file, podcast or lecture transcript, meeting recording

Draft from the vault: outline from concept pages, keep citations to the user's own sources, and surface where their material disagrees. Use this skill when the user wants to write an article, post, essay or newsletter based on what they have collected, or asks what they could wri

Use this skill when selecting and reporting verification for Skill changes; triggers include Skill change verification, quality gates, and evidence levels.

Use this skill when designing, running, interpreting, or reporting Agent Skill evaluations, selecting cases or judges, and analyzing trigger, benchmark, or regression evidence; triggers include Skill evaluation and evaluation design.

Use this skill when reviewing the contract completeness of Skills, Prompts, metadata, or QA documentation; triggers include Skill prose review, Prompt review, and contract audit.

Use this skill when auditing or trimming process residue from Skills, Prompts, comments, or docs; triggers include process prose cleanup, review residue, and current-state rewriting.

Use this skill when reviewing a complete Skill package for architecture, scope, triggers, independent installation, bilingual consistency, Eval readiness, and evidence boundaries; triggers include Skill quality review and package review.

Use this skill when you need to review acceptance criteria for ambiguity, missing rules, and verifiability; triggers include acceptance criteria review.

Use this skill when you need to design accessibility testing against WCAG, keyboard navigation, and assistive technology scenarios; triggers include accessibility testing and a11y testing.

Use this skill when you need evidence-bounded failure classification, retry/fallback/escalation, state consistency, user notice, and recovery evidence; triggers include Agent 故障恢复 and Agent failure recovery.

Use this skill when you need evidence-bounded checkpoints, heartbeats, resume, cancellation, duplicate submission, timeouts, and resource lifecycle; triggers include 长运行 Agent and long-running Agent.

Use this skill when you need evidence-bounded loop state, plan/action/observation cycles, stop conditions, budgets, repetition, and trace evidence; triggers include Agent 循环 and Agent loop.

Use this skill when you need evidence-bounded memory write/read/update/delete, retention, contamination, isolation, provenance, and forgetting behavior; triggers include Agent 记忆 and Agent memory.

Use this skill when you need evidence-bounded Agent identity, tool/resource scope, approval, denial, escalation, and side-effect boundaries; triggers include Agent 权限 and Agent permission.

Use this skill when you need to test AI agent tool-call contracts, authorization, failures, and side-effect boundaries; triggers include agent tool testing.

Use this skill when you need to test AI agent goals, state, planning, recovery, and safety boundaries; triggers include ai agent testing.

Use this skill when you need AI-assisted testing workflows such as test data generation, root-cause analysis, and prioritization; triggers include AI-assisted testing and AI for QA.

Use this skill when you need to test an AI-enabled product feature for behavior, safety, and user-impact boundaries; triggers include AI feature testing.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Setup automated synchronization workflows

Resolve synchronization conflicts automatically

Sync GitHub issues to Linear workspace

Sync Linear tasks to GitHub issues

Link pull requests to Linear tasks

Monitor GitHub-Linear sync health status

Synchronize task status with git commits, ensuring consistency between version control and task tracking.

Simulate system performance under various loads with capacity planning, bottleneck identification, and optimization strategies.

Create Linear tasks from pull requests

Test-driven development workflow with Red-Green-Refactor process and branch management

Balance team workload distribution

Automate changelog testing workflow

Analyze and report test coverage

I need you to create an integration testing plan for $ARGUMENTS

Accelerate scenario testing with rapid iteration cycles, confidence intervals, and compressed decision timelines.

Manage project todos in a todos.md file with add, complete, remove, and list operations

Generate troubleshooting documentation

Deep analysis and problem solving mode

Sets up a professional Unity project with industry-standard structure and configurations

Update current git branch name based on analysis of changes made

PiG (Pi in Go) is a faithful Go port of upstream Pi, the TypeScript codebase behind the Pi coding agent. It is a parity-bound translation, not a rewrite: upstre…

An AI Agent that lives in your pocket. Local-first and privacy focused.

Unofficial skill that teaches coding agents to build with TypeSafe AI's Jev: typed decisions, calibrated confidence, and prior art from 150+ community projects.

Adaptive Test-time Learning and Autonomous Specialization

Prediction-market trading engine — Wang Transform pricing on 291K+ contracts; paper-traded across Kalshi · Polymarket · Solana DFlow (Jito bundles) · 633 tests

Knowledge Management for Humans and Agents

Open-source Claude Cowork / Codex / WorkBuddy alternative — a local-first AI office agent that turns one request into real PPTX, DOCX, XLSX and HTML files. Runs…

DeepAgent Code: AI coding agent with persistent memory and control plane

Awesome Jev — evidence-graded index of TypeSafe System One: SDKs, MCP tools, agents, apps and open models. 20 languages, rebuilt every 2 hours.

CLI for Telegram — agent-friendly, daemon-based, with webhook event push.

AI deep-research agent that turns any question into a cited report: plans searches, reads real sources, verifies evidence. Self-hosted, multi-provider, Docker-r…

Event-stream AI Agent framework for building your persona bot 🍊

Give the agent a machine. Just not yours. Each AI coding agent gets its own isolated machine with root, Docker, and systemd - active defense detects and stops t…

Local Emperor-style AI agent with Vue WebUI, multi-provider LLMs, streaming chat, tools, skills, memory, and token telemetry.

Open-source AI reverse-engineering agent platform and MCP server for Ghidra, Frida, x64dbg and Rizin — automated PE/APK/binary analysis, CTF and malware researc…

"Never send a human to do a machine's job" - Open Source AI hacking agent

Prismer Cloud

My Personal Blog (Robotics)

Tau Coding Agent - like Pi, but twice as much

Open-source alternative to OpenAI Dots: self-hosted AI chat, tools, approvals, connectors, and computer tasks.