LLM Mart Basic

Merge multiple partial requirements YAML files from different readers into one consolidated req.yaml. Detects field conflicts between sources, identifies critical gaps, and produces a gap report. Run after all readers, before the gap-filling interview in arch-requirements.

Architecture committee review. Evaluates a diagram or design document against enterprise standards with structured scoring per dimension. Produces a gate decision: APPROVED / APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS / REJECTED. Use when: preparing for architecture review board, requesting commit

Deep-dive security audit of a technical architecture diagram. Focused exclusively on authentication, authorization, credential protection, network boundaries, and data classification. Does NOT score overall quality — produces a prioritized security finding list. Use after arch-va

Validate a technical architecture diagram image against enterprise architecture standards. Scores six dimensions (10 pts total), outputs structured JSON + text report. Use when: reviewing a draw.io export, checking a new design before committee review, or running CI validation on

Pipeline gatekeeper that enforces the mandatory ArchHarness stage order (requirements -> design -> draw -> validate -> enforce -> security/review -> optimize -> report). Uses the executable `archharness workflow` state machine — checks recorded manifests and gate decisions before

Use when establishing branching strategies, implementing Conventional Commits, creating or reviewing PRs, resolving PR review comments, merging PRs (including CI verification, auto-merge queues, and post-merge cleanup), managing PR review threads, merging PRs with signed commits,

Set up, evolve, or operate a hraness/wordcell local-first Markdown knowledge base for coding-agent memory. Use when a user asks to design Wordcell conventions or a recurring Wordcell ritual; search or query a Wordcell or Obsidian vault; load or recover repository context, plans,

End-to-end reviewer for a completed multi-phase feature at the end of a phase-orchestrator run. Use after all requested phases are finalized: inspects the whole feature against the plan and PRD/spec, hunting integration bugs across phase boundaries, missing acceptance criteria, s

Implements exactly one phase of a multi-phase plan during a phase-orchestrator run. Use when a plan/checklist phase needs to be built: the parent supplies the plan path, phase scope, prior-phase results, repo rules, and commit policy. Edits files directly; never commits unless co

Orchestrates phase-based implementation plans using the host's todo tracker and subagents for implementation, review, validation, default phase commits, plan finalization, and a final end-to-end review. Delegates work through the companion phase-implementer, phase-reviewer, and p

Reviews and fixes a just-implemented phase of a multi-phase plan during a phase-orchestrator run. Use after a phase's implementation and initial validation: checks the phase against the plan, PRD/spec, repo conventions, security, tenancy/data ownership, migrations, and test cover

Writes or restructures an implementation plan in the format the phase-orchestrator skill consumes: dependency-ordered phases with explicit scope, acceptance criteria, validation commands, and status/log conventions. Use when the user asks to write a plan for phase orchestration,

Build a complete account sheet before a meeting - company, people, news, tech, pains, and talking angles. Use before any important prospect or client interaction.

Produce complete ad creative sets - concepts, hooks, copy, AI-generated images and videos declined per platform and format. Use for Meta, Google, LinkedIn, TikTok campaigns and product launches.

Choose the right depth of reasoning for the task - shallow for routine edits, deep for architecture, security, or ambiguous bugs. Use when work quality depends on thinking harder (or intentionally less).

Read OpenAPI specs, call APIs, validate responses, and draft connectors. Use for integration work, contract testing, and client generation.

Audit the web/API attack surface - authn/authz on endpoints, CORS, CSRF, SSRF, security headers, rate limiting, mass assignment, and OWASP API Top 10. Use for /perimeter, API reviews, or exposed-surface hardening.

Track job applications - statuses, follow-ups, interviews, and reminders - in a structured pipeline. Use to keep a job search organized.

Default Navin skill for architecture and technical diagrams. Create polished, validated architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, and lifecycle diagrams as explorable HTML with inline SVG (PNG/SVG/WebM export). Use for system architecture, infrastructure topology, PPT/deck dia

Score CV-to-job-offer match, identify missing keywords, and check ATS parseability. Use before submitting any application.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Use the bundled `skillopt-sleep` skill to run or manage SkillOpt-Sleep for the

Git + worktree orchestrator entry point. /git-ops --landall surveys every branch/worktree and batch-lands the ones that are done; bare /git-ops runs a status survey. Thin router over the git-ops skill.

Save session state - persist tasks (via TaskList), plan content, and git context. Complementary to /sync.

Session bootstrap - read project context, restore saved state, show status. Quick orientation with optional deep dive.

Query AI Gateway models (list, filter by provider/tag, get details)

Search for icons by name, or identify a PUA character

Install a pinned skill extension on demand (/add-skill <id>), or list core packs and extensions

Implement an approved plan or issue in its own worktree, run the gate, open the pull request.

Close a finished session: sweep for unfinished work, ask once, land, file the follow-ups, hand off, tell the sessions that depend on this one, then archive.

Write the repository handoff file for the next session, and record any durable learning.

Merge an approved pull request, clean up its worktree and branch, then check whether a release is due.

Turn a topic or issue into a plan the reviewer approves in the native plan pane.

Answer a research question with parallel read-only gatherers and one synthesized digest.

Review the branch's diff in two fresh contexts — scope against the spec, then quality — and report findings only.

Run ad-hoc PostgreSQL analytics queries against dev/test database

Find and report technical debt in the codebase

Refreshes local project state from a linked Supabase project or branch in one step, instead of running `config pull`, `db pull`, `migration fetch`, and `functions download` individually. It runs four steps, always in this order: pull config into `supabase/config.toml`, optionally

Send one of the user's own Minutes meetings to their X1 household for review. Use when the user wants a meeting's summary, decisions, action items, and open questions to reach X1 so they can confirm what belongs in their household record. X1 asks the user to approve the send, and nothing reaches the household record until they confirm each item. Never use it for a restricted meeting, a transcript, or someone else's meeting.

Send one of the user's own Minutes meetings to their X1 household for review. Use when the user wants a meeting's summary, decisions, action items, and open questions to reach X1 so they can confirm what belongs in their household record. X1 asks the user to approve the send, and nothing reaches the household record until they confirm each item. Never use it for a restricted meeting, a transcript, or someone else's meeting.

Ultra-lightweight, open-source, self-hosted personal AI agent framework in Python with WebUI, tools, memory, MCP, multi-agent workflows, automation, and chat ap…

Governance framework for AI coding agents. It runs them through a five-step workflow (plan, build, review, test, ship) where no step counts as done without evid…

Ultimate Multi-Agent OS for Autonomous AI NPCs 2026

Personal AI Agent Hub 2026 — Build Your 24/7 Autonomous Assistant

Proven 2026 Multi-Agent AI Review System – Verdict-Driven Quality Control

Slash API Batch: Cut AI Costs by 50% in 2026

Web dashboard for Hermes Agent — multi-platform AI chat, session management, scheduled jobs, usage analytics

Agent Skills for Solopreneurs

AirLLM dramatically reduces inference memory usage, letting 70B large language models run on a single 4GB GPU card

Zero, your trustworthy AI teammate for real work.

一套 DSH runtime，Desktop、Web 与 TUI 三种开发体验。

Open-source operational advisor for ClickHouse — real-time monitoring plus AI-driven index/partition/materialized-view recommendations.

⚙️ TypeScript Style Guide and Agent Skill. A concise set of conventions and best practices for consistent, maintainable code.

Framework for AI agents to build and maintain a digital brain through Obsidian wiki

Apache Maka (Incubating) is a local-first AI agent workspace. Model messages, tool calls, tool results, permission decisions, and termination events are recorde…

Neo.mjs is a self-evolving software organism: a professional end-to-end AI engineering team whose cross-model swarm inhabits live apps via Neural Link, Active H…

Agentic development harness for Claude Code — SPEC-driven plan/run/sync, TRUST 5 quality gates, model+effort routing, and Claude×GLM multi-LLM cost control. Sin…

NocoBase is an open-source AI + no-code platform for building business systems fast. Instead of generating everything from scratch, AI works on top of productio…

An open-source AI coding agent that lives in your terminal.

PawWork — free, open-source desktop AI agent for macOS and Windows. Alternative to Codex App and Claude Cowork. BYOK with 75+ providers, ChatGPT OAuth, local mo…