LLM Mart Basic

Use when encountering a bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

Use when the user explicitly requests strict or test-first TDD, or when the current conversation already contains an explicit `TDD Route: strict` decision from another Aegis workflow.

Use when the user says `aegis:update`, asks to update or upgrade an installed Aegis method-pack, wants the latest Aegis version, or asks whether Aegis is current on this host.

Use when a coding task needs a concurrent checkout, unrelated dirty state blocks safe branch switching, or the user or repository explicitly requires a worktree.

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, passing, verified, release-ready, or ready to commit, merge, publish, or hand off.

Use when you have an approved spec or written requirements for a multi-step task that needs a durable plan document before touching code. Small, single-owner, or fast-path tasks do not need this skill.

Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment

Enhanced web search and real-time content retrieval via Grok API with forced tool routing. Use when: (1) Web search / information retrieval / fact-checking, (2) Webpage content extraction / URL parsing, (3) Breaking knowledge cutoff limits for current information, (4) Real-time n

Multi-step reasoning engine for complex analysis and systematic problem solving. Use when: (1) Complex debugging scenarios with multiple layers, (2) Architectural analysis and system design, (3) Problems requiring hypothesis testing and validation, (4) Multi-component failure inv

Time and timezone utilities for getting current time and converting between timezones. Use when: (1) Getting current time in any timezone, (2) Converting time between different timezones, (3) Working with IANA timezone names, (4) Scheduling across timezones, (5) Time-sensitive op

Semantic code understanding with IDE-like symbol operations. Use when: (1) Large codebase analysis (>50 files), (2) Symbol-level operations (find, rename, refactor), (3) Cross-file reference tracking, (4) Project memory and session persistence, (5) Multi-language semantic navigat

Deterministic Software Graph analysis via Ontoly CLI and MCP. Use when: (1) Codebase architecture, dependency, route, service, module, configuration, or impact questions need graph evidence, (2) A repository should be analyzed before source search, (3) You need a persistent Softw

Semantic codebase search, code indexing, and prompt enhancement via standalone CLI. Use when: (1) Semantic code search with natural language queries, (2) Code indexing for remote codebase retrieval, (3) Prompt enhancement with codebase context, (4) Before grep/find/glob operation

Incremental LLM-friendly wiki generator for Obsidian note vaults. Use when: (1) Building wiki from notes, (2) Ingesting notes to wiki, (3) Obsidian LLM wiki, (4) Incremental knowledge base management. Triggers: 'build wiki from notes', 'ingest notes to wiki', 'Obsidian LLM wiki',

Self-evolution workflow for the agent. Before substantive work, recall past outcomes from evolution memory; while editing, detect improvement signals; at task end, record the outcome; when reusable, distill or search the EvoMap network for proven genes/capsules. Use when the user

Delegates coding/research tasks to the Google Antigravity CLI (`agy`) for external-model execution (Gemini 3.x, Claude Sonnet/Opus 4.6, GPT-OSS). Replaces the broken `collaborating-with-gemini` skill. Use when: (1) External-model delegation via Antigravity, (2) Multi-model protot

Crawl GitHub trending repositories, analyze with LLM for Chinese insights, categorize by themes, compute diffs against history, and generate Markdown reports. Default brief mode stops at trend analysis; optional detailed mode appends per-project analysis. Supports incremental gap

Fetch up-to-date library/framework/API documentation from Context7, bypassing training-cutoff limits. Use when: (1) User asks how to use/configure/install a library, framework, or SDK, (2) Code examples or API reference needed for a specific package, (3) Version-specific behavior

Delegates coding tasks to Codex CLI for prototyping, debugging, and code review. Use when: (1) Backend/logic implementation, (2) Algorithm design and optimization, (3) Bug analysis and debugging, (4) API/database code generation, (5) Code quality review and refactoring. Triggers:

Delegates coding tasks from Codex to local Claude Code in print mode while preserving Claude's normal runtime customizations by default. Use when: (1) You want Codex to call Claude Code locally, (2) You need Claude-side skills, plugins, MCP servers, custom commands, CLAUDE.md rul

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Trim transcript clutter to extend session lifetime — analyze, prune a copy, or toggle the after-each-turn service. Dry-run by default; gains land at resume/compaction, not the current turn.

Inspect architectural variances with SMARTS; record only explicit user choices. Report-only requests make no changes.

Restructure code without changing observable behavior: rename, extract, inline, move, deduplicate, or replace an internal implementation with an equivalent one. Prove parity through unchanged pre-existing tests. Not for new behavior, bug fixes, explanation-only questions, or committing finished work.

Prepare a declared release target, or preview it with --dry-run. Derive its version and require authorization before publication.

Review a diff with the reviewer fleet, funneled to one triaged verdict. Targets the current working diff, a path, or an inbound GitHub PR.

Exploratory spike on a throwaway branch — answer a named question with disposable code. Never merges; exits to a findings note or /ca:feature.

Autonomous sprint — one interactive spec gate, then plan-to-PR execution with every auto-decision SMARTS-scored and logged. Hard gates remain true stops.

Daily repo hygiene — review the day's repo state, then perform the cleanups under per-action confirmation. Fast-forward only, never destructive without a yes.

Show the project's current state at a glance — stage, open tasks, open questions, overrides since the last checkpoint, current branch. Read-only.

Wire codeArbiter's statusline into ~/.claude/settings.json, or remove it.

The sanctioned task-board mutator — add a queued task, start one (flips to in-progress and stamps the date, minting a dotted ID on pick-up), or mark an in-progress task done. The only blessed write to open-tasks.md.

Threat-model a sensitive design with STRIDE on request. Read-only analysis of threats, controls, and implementation constraints.

Run an opt-in deep codebase audit with persisted findings. Confirm cost before dispatch; filing and telemetry need separate approval.

Watch a PR's CI to completion — diagnose on red, notify and offer the merge on green. Never auto-merges.

Reviews a new or changed third-party dependency before adoption. The read-only

A read-only health scan of every recorded ADR under `.codearbiter/decisions/`. For each one it

Records an architectural decision as a numbered, dated ADR under `.codearbiter/decisions/`.

Assembles everything codeArbiter logs — `overrides.log`, `triage.log`, `decisions/`,

The one exception to codeArbiter's slash-command pipeline: a lightweight question-and-answer

A periodic whole-repository review. The caller supplies the reviewer unit list to

Ultra-lightweight, open-source, self-hosted personal AI agent framework in Python with WebUI, tools, memory, MCP, multi-agent workflows, automation, and chat ap…

Governance framework for AI coding agents. It runs them through a five-step workflow (plan, build, review, test, ship) where no step counts as done without evid…

Ultimate Multi-Agent OS for Autonomous AI NPCs 2026

Personal AI Agent Hub 2026 — Build Your 24/7 Autonomous Assistant

Proven 2026 Multi-Agent AI Review System – Verdict-Driven Quality Control

Slash API Batch: Cut AI Costs by 50% in 2026

Web dashboard for Hermes Agent — multi-platform AI chat, session management, scheduled jobs, usage analytics

Agent Skills for Solopreneurs

AirLLM dramatically reduces inference memory usage, letting 70B large language models run on a single 4GB GPU card

Zero, your trustworthy AI teammate for real work.

一套 DSH runtime，Desktop、Web 与 TUI 三种开发体验。

Open-source operational advisor for ClickHouse — real-time monitoring plus AI-driven index/partition/materialized-view recommendations.

⚙️ TypeScript Style Guide and Agent Skill. A concise set of conventions and best practices for consistent, maintainable code.

Framework for AI agents to build and maintain a digital brain through Obsidian wiki

Apache Maka (Incubating) is a local-first AI agent workspace. Model messages, tool calls, tool results, permission decisions, and termination events are recorde…

Neo.mjs is a self-evolving software organism: a professional end-to-end AI engineering team whose cross-model swarm inhabits live apps via Neural Link, Active H…

Agentic development harness for Claude Code — SPEC-driven plan/run/sync, TRUST 5 quality gates, model+effort routing, and Claude×GLM multi-LLM cost control. Sin…

NocoBase is an open-source AI + no-code platform for building business systems fast. Instead of generating everything from scratch, AI works on top of productio…

An open-source AI coding agent that lives in your terminal.

PawWork — free, open-source desktop AI agent for macOS and Windows. Alternative to Codex App and Claude Cowork. BYOK with 75+ providers, ChatGPT OAuth, local mo…