LLM Mart Basic

Use when implementing a multi-file change, building a feature from a breakdown, or writing a large amount of code. Not for a single settled ticket: use work.

Use when writing or restructuring code, before adding a helper, wrapper, config key, or dependency, or when the user asks for minimal or DRY code. Not for performance tuning: use optimize.

Use when asked to audit comments in code files and propose structural replacements or deletions with per-candidate approval. Not for deterministic commented-out-code removal: use deslop.

Use when a human says "overhaul", "rebuild this subsystem", or "rewrite it from scratch". Not for thin-slice features: use incremental-implementation. Not for root-cause repair: use strike-the-root.

Use when asked to optimize code, speed up a path, reduce allocations, repair a regression, or profile a target. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when a request names a working principle (subtract before you add, idempotent operations, never block on the human) or asks which principle applies. Not for running a repair: use strike-the-root.

Use when modernizing APIs, removing compat shims, killing feature flags, or rewriting a subsystem cleanly. Not for additive refactors that must preserve the old path.

Use when a trusted bug or performance report needs reproduction and fix. Not for untrusted reports or scope beyond the named feature.

Use when an implementation has more workarounds than structure and another patch will not pay. Not for in-place re-derivation: use breaking-driven. Not for one-artifact rewrites: use rewrite-clean-v0.

Use when the user says "simplify this diff" or asks for a compression pass over a change-set. Not for dead-code sweeps: use deslop.

Use when an exact symbol, path, entrypoint, or line range can bound a focused code question or patch proposal under a fixed source budget. Not for source changes or broad repository exploration.

Use when writing or verifying framework-specific code, boilerplate, or a documented, correct implementation. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when a feature begins or specs are checked in: author or update behavioral specs and keep them current with what ships. Not for producing the initial approved spec and plan: use spec-driven.

Use when a bug, failure, flake, regression, review finding, or ticket needs the core fixed so it cannot recur. Not for greenfield features: use tdd. Not for style-only review or typo-class one-liners.

Use when the user says greenfield this or rescue this codebase, names a field (dark, red, blue, or brown), or diagnoses a subsystem. Not for specs: use to-spec. Not for remote or irreversible changes.

Use when an abstraction leak must be sealed as a module seam, configuration option, or explicit override, or exposed as a named boundary. Not for detecting concealment patterns: use no-hide.

Use when the user says "audit my code", "find all the bugs", "review until clean", or "grill my changes". Not for remote, credential, or irreversible changes.

Use when asked to audit an agent or AI feature for agentic-experience quality (AX review, agent-native critique, trust question). Not for source or remote-system changes.

Use when asked to determine what a change could break before it ships. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when a user wants to identify the true sources of complexity qualitatively before counting metrics. Not for source or remote mutation.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

为当前项目部署或检查 ZCode 网文 Skills、Commands、Hooks 与 AGENTS.md。

短篇网文拆文，分析故事核、情绪线、结构和反转。

短篇网文扫榜，分析盐言、七猫、黑岩、点众等平台趋势。

短篇网文写作，从目标情绪、反转和小节大纲到正文。

网文工具箱路由入口。根据模糊意图分发到合适的网文 Skill。

Review the codebase across critical quality axes

Workflow-based 8-axis codebase review — per-axis sub-workflows, adversarial verify, deterministic scoring + rendering

Run a multi-model code review on uncommitted changes or a described set of files

Create a structured, phased implementation plan for a feature or change in the coder_eval codebase, executable from a fresh session by /coder-eval-implement-plan

Implement an approved coder_eval plan phase by phase with risk-scaled per-phase review, then a final code review

Generate per-task review.json (summary + tags) for a completed run

Evolve skill files by integrating validated lessons from real usage

Initialize .autocontext/ in the current project for knowledge persistence

Interactively review and curate accumulated project lessons

First-run configuration for the autocontext plugin

Show knowledge stats for the current project

Create event materials (flyers, posters, signage) with your organization's branding

Create an HTML email newsletter with your organization's branding

Create a single-page fact sheet or program overview

Launch interactive preview for document editing

The fastest way to put Volcengine Ark in your terminal and your AI agent — go from prompt to generated media, multimodal answer, or deployed endpoint in a sin…

本地私有、开源的自进化跨平台 AI 内容发现 Agent：先理解你，再主动从 B站、小红书、抖音、YouTube、X、知乎、Reddit、微博等平台与开放 Web 寻找内容。（支持 deepseek harness 插件） | Local-first open-source cross-platform AI cont…

Persistent memory for AI coding agents — one verified kb_search replaces the grep/find/ls orientation loop. Cross-repo, CPU-only, zero token spend.

AI 时代的伯克希尔：基于 Claude Code / Codex 的价值投资研究框架。巴菲特·芒格·段永平·李录四大师方法论 + 多Agent并行研究。| AI-era Berkshire: a value investing research framework built for Claude Code / Co…

The batteries-included, No-Code FinOps automation platform, with the AI you trust.

Open-source 3D AI agent framework — GLB/glTF avatars with LLM brains, memory, emotions, and autonomous payments. MCP server · x402 · Solana/EVM · Three.js. Embe…

XLSX parser for LLMs, RAG, LangChain, LangGraph, CrewAI, Claude, MCP — turns Excel (.xlsx) into citation-ready JSON with formulas, charts, dependency graphs, an…

Hermes-Relay — Your Hermes AI agent, in your pocket — chat, voice, and control.

A minimalist, terminal-native coding agent written in C.

AI-powered OSINT agent with interactive REPL, MCP server, and CLI. 19 tools. Works with Claude, GPT-4, or local models. For authorized security research only.

AI pair programming in your terminal — one static binary, sub-ms startup, any model

Where data access meets operational intelligence

Build your own security agents. Open-source framework for agents with live, read-only access to your infrastructure, with no path to widen it. Reasons across AW…

Multi-workspace terminal aggregator with Claude Code AI integration

Go implementation of AI coding agent

Harness engineering beginner tutorial, from 0 to 1

Generate images directly in DeepSeek Harness chats

A smarter, self-hosted AI assistant — multi-user, multi-agent.

Turn any research paper into a commercialization report — 6 AI agents, TRL/MRL scoring, patent landscape, market intelligence, verified citations. DeepSeek / Op…

Power BI CLI - semantic models (.NET TOM) and PBIR reports for token-efficient AI agent usage, built for Claude Code