Claude Cursor Skill

complexity-grill

Use when a user wants to identify the true sources of complexity qualitatively before counting metrics. Not for source or remote mutation.

LLM Mart · 0 points · 11 views 0 listing impressions 0 install-command copies
Virus-scanned Reviewed automatically before listing.

Full trust report

Download OutlineDriven-odin-claude-plugin-plugins_odin-review_skills_complexity-grill-f73ec79.zip · 1 KB
Part of outlinedriven/odin-claude-plugin — 120 skills

Install

skills CLI npx skills add https://github.com/OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin/tree/main/plugins/odin-review/skills/complexity-grill
Claude Code claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install outlinedriven-odin-claude-plugin@llmmart
Git git clone https://github.com/OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin.git

The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole outlinedriven/odin-claude-plugin collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.

Skill manifest

Complexity grill

Contract

Field Bound contract
Trigger User wants to identify the true sources of complexity qualitatively before counting metrics.
Authority Read-only. No file, VCS, credential, paid, published, deployed, or remote mutation.
Side effect Chat output only: a qualitative complexity-source report with ranked root causes.
Done True complexity sources are identified qualitatively and ranked before any metric is counted.

Inputs

The code region, module, or design surface to analyze must be supplied. Optional: a named concern to weight (coupling, hidden state, leaky abstraction, special-case proliferation, accidental concurrency, premature generality, indirection exceeding what it hides). No metric input is accepted before the qualitative ranking is settled.

Procedure

  1. Bound scope to the named region and read it. Do not mutate anything. Done when: the region is read and scope is bounded.
  2. Enumerate candidate complexity sources qualitatively. For each, state where it lives and what effort it forces: coupling that blocks independent change, hidden state that must be tracked by hand, leaky abstractions, special-case proliferation, accidental concurrency, premature generality, or indirection that exceeds the complexity it hides. Done when: every candidate source is named with its location and forced effort.
  3. Rank candidates by the real cognitive or maintenance effort they force, not by any numeric metric. Break ties by root cause: a source that produces other sources ranks above a symptom it creates. Done when: candidates are ranked by effort with root-cause tie-breaking.
  4. Only after the qualitative ranking is settled, optionally attach a metric to confirm a ranked source. Metrics confirm; they never discover, reorder, or lead the ranking. If no metric is available, the ranking stands on its qualitative evidence. Done when: a metric is attached as confirmation or the ranking stands on qualitative evidence alone.
  5. Return the ranked report. Done when: the ranked report is returned.

Failure and recovery

  • Metrics-first: if a numeric metric is introduced before the ranking is settled, discard it, return to step 2, and re-rank qualitatively.
  • Symptom-as-root: if a ranked source is itself produced by a deeper source, demote it, promote the deeper source, and re-rank.
  • Unbounded scope: if the region cannot be read in one pass, narrow to a named sub-region and state the narrowing. Never widen scope to force a result.
  • Boundary breach: if any edit or mutation is attempted, stop and report the read-only breach. No partial mutation is retained.

Output

Ranked complexity-source report: ordered root causes, each naming its location, the effort it forces, and whether a deeper source produces it. Any metric appears only as a confirmation footnote after the ranking.

Files (odin-claude-plugin)
  • agents
    • openai.yaml 173 B
      interface:
        display_name: "Complexity Grill"
        short_description: "Use when a user wants to identify the true sources of complexity qualitatively before counting metrics."
      
  • SKILL.md 3 KB
    ---
    name: complexity-grill
    description: 'Use when a user wants to identify the true sources of complexity qualitatively before counting metrics. Not for source or remote mutation.'
    disable-model-invocation: true
    ---
    
    # Complexity grill
    
    ## Contract
    
    | Field | Bound contract |
    |---|---|
    | Trigger | User wants to identify the true sources of complexity qualitatively before counting metrics. |
    | Authority | Read-only. No file, VCS, credential, paid, published, deployed, or remote mutation. |
    | Side effect | Chat output only: a qualitative complexity-source report with ranked root causes. |
    | Done | True complexity sources are identified qualitatively and ranked before any metric is counted. |
    
    ## Inputs
    
    The code region, module, or design surface to analyze must be supplied. Optional: a named concern to weight (coupling, hidden state, leaky abstraction, special-case proliferation, accidental concurrency, premature generality, indirection exceeding what it hides). No metric input is accepted before the qualitative ranking is settled.
    
    ## Procedure
    
    1. Bound scope to the named region and read it. Do not mutate anything. Done when: the region is read and scope is bounded.
    2. Enumerate candidate complexity sources qualitatively. For each, state where it lives and what effort it forces: coupling that blocks independent change, hidden state that must be tracked by hand, leaky abstractions, special-case proliferation, accidental concurrency, premature generality, or indirection that exceeds the complexity it hides. Done when: every candidate source is named with its location and forced effort.
    3. Rank candidates by the real cognitive or maintenance effort they force, not by any numeric metric. Break ties by root cause: a source that produces other sources ranks above a symptom it creates. Done when: candidates are ranked by effort with root-cause tie-breaking.
    4. Only after the qualitative ranking is settled, optionally attach a metric to confirm a ranked source. Metrics confirm; they never discover, reorder, or lead the ranking. If no metric is available, the ranking stands on its qualitative evidence. Done when: a metric is attached as confirmation or the ranking stands on qualitative evidence alone.
    5. Return the ranked report. Done when: the ranked report is returned.
    
    ## Failure and recovery
    
    - Metrics-first: if a numeric metric is introduced before the ranking is settled, discard it, return to step 2, and re-rank qualitatively.
    - Symptom-as-root: if a ranked source is itself produced by a deeper source, demote it, promote the deeper source, and re-rank.
    - Unbounded scope: if the region cannot be read in one pass, narrow to a named sub-region and state the narrowing. Never widen scope to force a result.
    - Boundary breach: if any edit or mutation is attempted, stop and report the read-only breach. No partial mutation is retained.
    
    ## Output
    
    Ranked complexity-source report: ordered root causes, each naming its location, the effort it forces, and whether a deeper source produces it. Any metric appears only as a confirmation footnote after the ranking.
    

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet.

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet.

Related