LLM Mart Basic

Use when the user wants adversarial stress-testing of a proposed architecture, structure, or shape. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

Use when the user asks for a council, second opinions, or parallel investigation. Not for cross-examination of existing proposals: use cross-critique.

Use when independent proposals on a contested decision need cross-critique before choosing, reusing the original authors. Not for parallel multi-stance investigation: use council.

Use when one reviewer is not enough because failure modes are heterogeneous, or a claim needs cross-lens pressure before it ships. Not for collapsing a decision field: use converge.

Use when a current decision needs pressure-testing until the rationale is clear to a skeptic. Not for tasks requiring source or remote-system changes.

Use when a non-trivial decision sits under uncertainty and correctness matters more than speed. Not for patch review: use review. Not for plan attacks: use load-bearing-assumption-test.

Use when the user asks why a plan is wrong or says "poke holes in this". Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

Use when one reviewer angle is insufficient or the user suspects a direction is tunnel-visioned or inherited its framing. Modes: artifact, direction. Not for source or remote-system changes.

Use when a workflow, plan, diff, or completed work cycle must be checked for practices that punish the project later. Not for source, remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when asking "overkill?", "elegant?", "audit", or "taste-test this", or setting a taste register. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

Use when product copy needs buyer-objection evidence collected through approved, consented outreach. Not for unsolicited outreach or survey design.

Use when the user wants the current jargon weather of a domain described without advocacy. Not for choosing a positioning move: use buzzword-hijack.

Use when a user wants to choose and execute a bounded positioning move that rides a jargon wave. Not for describing the jargon weather of a domain: use buzzword-analysis.

Use when asked to research a feature across competitor products or to analyze competitor release changelogs (mode: changelog), and publish a cited report.

Use when customer feedback, NPS, churn, email feedback, call transcripts, or voice-of-the-customer analysis needs a report over a time window.

Use when dogfooding a developer-facing product or workflow to produce an evidence-backed DX scorecard. Not for visual UI audit: use web-design-review.

Use when projecting cost, estimating BYO cost or spend, or sizing a deal. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when invoking /product-signal-pulse with an optional lookback window to query configured product signals. Not for credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when asked to analyze a screen recording, voice capture, or meeting notes artifact for product feedback. Not for credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when asked to draft launch or promotion copy for a shipped feature across channels via /release-promotion. Not for posting, publishing, scheduling, or committing, drafts only.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Run an organic-social (ECHO) workflow: channel portfolio and voice dossiers, platform-native content and calendars, the social-quality gate with a pre-publish go/no-go, community/inbox/crisis operations, and the listening/SOV/dark-social measurement loop. Not sure? Use /aaron-marketing:auto.

Route meeting-recall questions to the right Minutes MCP tool.

Prepare a sourced Minutes meeting outcome for human-governed closeout of existing X1 work. Use when the user wants a meeting decision or commitment to close, defer, escalate, or retire a specific X1 coordination thread. Never use it to infer settlement, move money, contact anyone, or close X1 work automatically.

Route meeting-recall questions to the right Minutes MCP tool.

Prepare a sourced Minutes meeting outcome for human-governed closeout of existing X1 work. Use when the user wants a meeting decision or commitment to close, defer, escalate, or retire a specific X1 coordination thread. Never use it to infer settlement, move money, contact anyone, or close X1 work automatically.

`crabbox capacity [--json]` reports the authenticated owner's current admission

Code review the current proposed code change

Resolve a merge conflict

Code review for pull request $1

Six Thinking Hats Analysis

Slash commands shipped by the plugin. Portable framework commands work in any Claude Code session; the workflow commands embed one author's personal setup and are opt-in - see [Adapting for your workflow](../README.md#adapting-for-your-workflow) before relying on them. Back to th

Autonomous fix loop for failing CI on the repo's default branch

Autonomous PR fixing loop - iterates on CI failures and review comments until green

GitHub-issue marathon - triage open issues, then run agent-ready ones to merge with Agent Teams

Example Marathon Configuration for CLAUDE.md - copy the section below into your project's CLAUDE.md

Task Master - plan, start, review, and close

Deep understanding mode (nemawashi) - exhaustive context-gathering before action

Searches Burp Suite project files for security analysis

Detects timing side-channels in cryptographic code

Performs security-focused differential review of code changes

PiG (Pi in Go) is a faithful Go port of upstream Pi, the TypeScript codebase behind the Pi coding agent. It is a parity-bound translation, not a rewrite: upstre…

An AI Agent that lives in your pocket. Local-first and privacy focused.

Unofficial skill that teaches coding agents to build with TypeSafe AI's Jev: typed decisions, calibrated confidence, and prior art from 150+ community projects.

Adaptive Test-time Learning and Autonomous Specialization

Prediction-market trading engine — Wang Transform pricing on 291K+ contracts; paper-traded across Kalshi · Polymarket · Solana DFlow (Jito bundles) · 633 tests

Knowledge Management for Humans and Agents

Open-source Claude Cowork / Codex / WorkBuddy alternative — a local-first AI office agent that turns one request into real PPTX, DOCX, XLSX and HTML files. Runs…

DeepAgent Code: AI coding agent with persistent memory and control plane

Awesome Jev — evidence-graded index of TypeSafe System One: SDKs, MCP tools, agents, apps and open models. 20 languages, rebuilt every 2 hours.

CLI for Telegram — agent-friendly, daemon-based, with webhook event push.

AI deep-research agent that turns any question into a cited report: plans searches, reads real sources, verifies evidence. Self-hosted, multi-provider, Docker-r…

Event-stream AI Agent framework for building your persona bot 🍊

Give the agent a machine. Just not yours. Each AI coding agent gets its own isolated machine with root, Docker, and systemd - active defense detects and stops t…

Local Emperor-style AI agent with Vue WebUI, multi-provider LLMs, streaming chat, tools, skills, memory, and token telemetry.

Open-source AI reverse-engineering agent platform and MCP server for Ghidra, Frida, x64dbg and Rizin — automated PE/APK/binary analysis, CTF and malware researc…

"Never send a human to do a machine's job" - Open Source AI hacking agent

Prismer Cloud

My Personal Blog (Robotics)

Tau Coding Agent - like Pi, but twice as much

Open-source alternative to OpenAI Dots: self-hosted AI chat, tools, approvals, connectors, and computer tasks.