LLM Mart Basic

Use when any bounded workflow starts or reaches an action, path, proposal, or merge boundary. Refuses rather than default-allow on an unreadable constraint set.

Use when work is about to grow past the ask, the task may already be done, or the user requests only the minimum. Not for executing the work: use tdd to build or strike-the-root to fix.

Use when an artifact or skill has just changed and is about to be called done, committed, or handed off. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when the user suspects no installed skill covers a task and wants proof. Names the owning skill or writes a missing-skill brief. Never routes or invokes the matched skill.

Use when a task, feature, or fix is called done, complete, finished, or fixed, or before a commit, PR, or next task. Not for fact-checking: use verify-both-ways. Not for measuring: use verify-this.

Use when the user wants to classify abstractions as useful, bad, or busy and keep one shallow level. Not for tasks requiring source or remote-system changes.

Use when a task is ambiguous or intent needs eliciting: exhaustive/collaborative/adversarial askme, batch questions, interview, ambiguity scan, or intent proposal. Not for one fork: use decide.

Use when the user runs /autoplan on a plan or idea. Reviews, amends, and derives task IDs with a final human approval gate. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when asked to park an undecided idea without representing it as decided or active work. Not for decided or active work: use the project task system.

Use when the user wants to collapse an open decision field to one decision and record its rationale locally. Not for multi-lens pressure testing. No remote or irreversible changes.

Use when the user has a fork and wants it resolved and applied, not explored: "decide this", "choose the path", or "decide and fix it".

Use when the user wants the finished-system contract for a piece of work: behavior, protocols, allowed, forbidden, and impossible states with a state-space proof. Not for runtime verification.

Use when the user wants to expand a decision field with additional options and dimensions. Not for selecting or applying an option: use decide. No source or remote-system changes.

Use when the user explicitly requests a Tarot draw or casually delegates an ambiguous choice among multiple valid approaches.

Use when a user wants to define failure states, recovery actions, bypasses, and degraded modes for a component during design. Not for runtime recovery.

Use when a user wants to rebuild a design, organization, or API from primitives. Not for a perspective take: use from-*-perspective seats.

Use when asked to derive the general rule a request carries as examples instead of a stated rule, then bound it. Not for ambiguity in a stated request: use askme. Read-only.

Use when a durable effort needs an approved, checkable success predicate before work starts. Not for requirement-to-evidence ledgers. Never remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible.

Use when defining, revising, or gate-replanning the project structural backbone in project-root graph.yaml. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when the user asks to park ideas or inspiration for later. Not for code, backlog, or divergence-class cards, or remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

credo - Set up Claude Code with recommended workflows and plugins

dogma - Find and fix AI-typical patterns in code (reactive cleanup)

dogma - Sync documentation across README files and wiki articles

dogma - Interactively collect and apply CLAUDE rules to the project

dogma - Add ignore patterns to multiple locations at once

dogma - Run project-specific linting and formatting on staged files (non-interactive)

dogma - Create or update DOGMA-PERMISSIONS.md interactively (Git, File, and Workflow permissions)

dogma - Sanitize git history from Claude/AI traces and fix tracking issues

dogma - Intelligently sync Claude instructions from a source to the current project with interactive review

dogma - Check and fix version mismatches across all version files

Install GSD resources into the active Claude config dir (${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.claude}/get-shit-done/) (required before using other GSD commands)

Remove GSD resources from the active Claude config dir (${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.claude})

hydra - Remove already merged worktrees and their branches

hydra - Create a new Git worktree for isolated work

hydra - Safely remove a Git worktree

hydra - Show available commands and explain the concept

hydra - List all Git worktrees of the repository

hydra - Merge a worktree branch back into current branch

hydra - Start multiple agents in parallel across worktrees

hydra - Start an agent in an existing worktree

PiG (Pi in Go) is a faithful Go port of upstream Pi, the TypeScript codebase behind the Pi coding agent. It is a parity-bound translation, not a rewrite: upstre…

An AI Agent that lives in your pocket. Local-first and privacy focused.

Unofficial skill that teaches coding agents to build with TypeSafe AI's Jev: typed decisions, calibrated confidence, and prior art from 150+ community projects.

Adaptive Test-time Learning and Autonomous Specialization

Prediction-market trading engine — Wang Transform pricing on 291K+ contracts; paper-traded across Kalshi · Polymarket · Solana DFlow (Jito bundles) · 633 tests

Knowledge Management for Humans and Agents

Open-source Claude Cowork / Codex / WorkBuddy alternative — a local-first AI office agent that turns one request into real PPTX, DOCX, XLSX and HTML files. Runs…

DeepAgent Code: AI coding agent with persistent memory and control plane

Awesome Jev — evidence-graded index of TypeSafe System One: SDKs, MCP tools, agents, apps and open models. 20 languages, rebuilt every 2 hours.

CLI for Telegram — agent-friendly, daemon-based, with webhook event push.

AI deep-research agent that turns any question into a cited report: plans searches, reads real sources, verifies evidence. Self-hosted, multi-provider, Docker-r…

Event-stream AI Agent framework for building your persona bot 🍊

Give the agent a machine. Just not yours. Each AI coding agent gets its own isolated machine with root, Docker, and systemd - active defense detects and stops t…

Local Emperor-style AI agent with Vue WebUI, multi-provider LLMs, streaming chat, tools, skills, memory, and token telemetry.

Open-source AI reverse-engineering agent platform and MCP server for Ghidra, Frida, x64dbg and Rizin — automated PE/APK/binary analysis, CTF and malware researc…

"Never send a human to do a machine's job" - Open Source AI hacking agent

Prismer Cloud

My Personal Blog (Robotics)

Tau Coding Agent - like Pi, but twice as much

Open-source alternative to OpenAI Dots: self-hosted AI chat, tools, approvals, connectors, and computer tasks.