LLM Mart Basic

Use when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and n

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when looking for meaningfully duplicated logic in a codebase, especially duplicate behavior hidden behind different names, different syntax, different control flow, or independently evolved implementations. Not for style issues, not for syntactic clone detection

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when code needs a security review against the OWASP Top 10:2025 — access control, misconfiguration, supply chain, cryptography, injection, insecure design, authentication, integrity, logging and alerting, and mishandled exceptional conditions. Not for penetratio

Use when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review. Not for codebase structure, not for code style, and not for fixing what it finds.

Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking cod

Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a .reviews/architecture/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that repo

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when a session is running out of context and the work needs to continue in a fresh one, or when starting a session meant to pick up where an earlier one stopped. Not for compacting in place — that is /compact — and not for specifying work that has not started, w

Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cros

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for gene

EXPERIMENTAL. Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test su

Use when making a small, quick change — a bug fix, typo, minor feature, tweak, or anything the user calls "vibe coding" — that looks like 1-3 files in the same module

Use when auditing a user-facing app — web, mobile (iOS/Android/React Native/Flutter), desktop, CLI, or games — for accessibility barriers or WCAG 2.2 conformance, before shipping UI changes, or in response to concerns about screen-reader, keyboard, low-vision, motor, cognitive, o

Use when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and n

Use when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review. Not for codebase structure, not for code style, and not for fixing what it finds.

Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking cod

Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a .reviews/architecture/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that repo

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when a session is running out of context and the work needs to continue in a fresh one, or when starting a session meant to pick up where an earlier one stopped. Not for compacting in place — that is /compact — and not for specifying work that has not started, w

Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cros

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for gene

EXPERIMENTAL. Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test su

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Smart router: classify requests and route to the correct agent + skill

Generate project-specific CLAUDE.md from repo analysis.

Triage GitHub notifications: fetch, classify, report actions needed.

`github-profile-rules` — extract programming rules and coding conventions from a GitHub user's public profile via API.

Run the complete 34-stage implementation workflow for a large, multi-system, multi-wave, or CPU-delegated 5 Star Booker GM program.

Plan, then apply, the VexJoy Agent install with the vexinstall engine

Comprehensive PR review using specialized agents, with automatic retro knowledge capture

Reddit moderation: fetch modqueue, classify content, take mod actions

Learning system interface: stats, search, graduate learnings. Backed by learning.db (SQLite + FTS5).

Systematic upgrade pipeline for adapting agents, skills, and hooks when Claude Code ships updates, user goals change, or retro learnings accumulate.

agentii.full-equity-research — the spec 046 kit command. Use the Skill tool to run agentii:full-equity-research on this workspace.

agentii.synthesize — the spec 046 kit command. Use the Skill tool to run agentii:synthesize on this workspace.

Run the Agent Diversity Review gate and emit the result table

Scaffold a new spawnable specialist agent def and register it in the agent taxonomy

Audit whether user-visible changes in the current session have matching CHANGELOG.md entries; report MISSING with suggested lines; --fix auto-appends

Repeatable pass upgrading an Angular admin dashboard into a compact black-and-cyan developer-cockpit PWA

Run the drift-detection checklist (incl. agent-drift signals); report + fix in-turn

Orchestrate the final review fan-out (integration + diversity + risk + release readiness)

Run the AI-augmented lint self-improvement loop on the current project. Scans `.lint-history/` for recurring violation patterns (≥3 hits in 30d window), drafts a Claude-ready prompt to author a new semgrep rule for the top candidate, and surfaces the proposal under `.lint-history/proposals/<ts>.md`. Non-blocking analysis. See rules/lint-doctrine.md § Self-improving.

Bootstrap industry-leading lint+autofix+commit-hygiene stack on the current project. Drops in lefthook, oxlint, ESLint, Prettier, Stylelint, markdownlint, ruff, shellcheck, shfmt, yamllint, hadolint, actionlint, jscpd, knip, semgrep, gitleaks, commitizen + git-cz-emoji (emoji-mandatory commits), and semantic-release. Idempotent — re-runs upgrade safely. See rules/lint-doctrine.md.

Claude Code skills for Chinese-narration recaps from supported video files, with optional editable JianYing/CapCut draft export. | 用 Claude Code skills 为支持的视频文件…

Drive the Unity Editor from an AI agent or the terminal. The Editor serves MCP itself over HTTP, so there is no second process to run, and the isuzu-unity-cli c…

面向企业的数字员工构建与运行平台：把专业员工的经验、流程与判断标准，固化为可随时上岗、可配置、可审批、可观测的 AI 数字员工。

A local-first, Pi-powered AI agent workspace for Desktop, WebUI, and CLI

660+ muapi-hosted generative-media models plus community-submitted third-party API tools (SEO, enrichment, social, scraping) — one YAML file per entry, browsabl…

A compounding agent OS for recursive agents. Also an open source alternative to Grok Bot and Meta's Muse.

Independent desktop client for OpenCode 2. Manage projects, sessions, parallel agents, requests, and changes on Linux and macOS.

Production agent skills for Claude Code, Cursor, and any SKILL.md harness — Codex fleets, video pipeline, monorepo review bundles, multi-chain explorer.

See and manage what your coding assistants load — skills, commands, subagents, plugins and MCP servers, with real usage.

An Enterprise-Grade Full-Stack RBAC Permission Management System Built with Go + React

Create AI Agents in a No-Code Visual Builder or TypeScript SDK with full 2-way sync. For shipping AI assistants and multi-agent AI workflows.

基于 DeepSeek Harness（DSH）的稳定桌面端，集成Git、内置浏览器与记忆功能 | DeepSeek Harness desktop GUI with local workspaces, Git, browser and memory.

⚡ Control Apache Airflow with natural language via MCP. Chat with your workflows using Claude, GPT, or any LLM — no REST API calls needed. Supports Airflow 2.x…

Open-source CLI, schemas, resolver, and DSH agent tools for DSH Plugin Hub

Pi Coding Agent 中文学习蓝皮书：从安装与第一个可验收任务开始，逐步掌握 Session、Context、Skill、Extension、Subagent 与长期 Agent 工作流。

Self-hosted framework for orchestrating fleets of specialist AI agents — ensemble reasoning and a full agentic coding pipeline, model-agnostic and local-friendl…

Self-hosted, vendor-neutral control plane for your local coding agents (Claude Code & Codex). Run your agents, on any plane.

A practical AI agents handbook covering agent systems, agentic workflows, LangGraph, MCP/A2A, context engineering, agent memory, evaluation, observability, and…

Vibe Coding 从入门到精通教程｜AI 结对编程工作流｜Prompt、Skill、Workflow、上下文管理、codex实战指南

Static security scanner for LLM agents — prompt injection, MCP config auditing, taint analysis. 51 rules mapped to OWASP Agentic Top 10 (2026). Works with LangC…