LLM Mart Basic

Use when the user is explicitly working with Quarto, .qmd files, _quarto.yml, Quarto projects, or Quarto features such as callouts, cross-references, citations, Mermaid diagrams, extensions, websites, books, presentations, and reports. Also use for explicit migration from or comp

Deploy or publish Python and R content to a Posit Connect server using rsconnect-python or the R rsconnect package. Handles interactive apps and dashboards, web APIs, rendered documents, and prepared bundles/manifests. Use whenever the user asks to deploy, publish, or redeploy co

Guide for drafting issue closure and decline responses as an open-source package maintainer. Use when helping compose a reply that says "no" to a feature request, closes an issue as won't-fix, redirects a user to a different package, explains why a design choice is intentional, o

Use when the user wants to find, evaluate, audit, or install an open-source AI agent skill or MCP server — e.g. "find an MCP server for Postgres", "is this skill safe to install", "what should I use to scrape a website". Searches a quality-scored, security-graded catalog of ~20K

Generator-evaluator separation and review methodology — loaded by review agents to enforce fresh-context review discipline and gate verdicts; findings from the code, security, and docs reviewers are formatted per the conventional-comments skill. Trigger on "review this diff", "re

Adversarially review a technical design document with fresh context. Dispatches the built-in read-only `Explore` subagent (clean context, no shared history with the design-author) against `docs/plans/<id>/design.md` and presents its verdict — APPROVE, REQUEST CHANGES, or COMMENT.

Tear down local and remote branch state after a pull request is finished, in one of two modes. Mode A (merged): verify the PR actually merged, remove the branch's worktree, resync the default branch, and delete the local branch. Mode B (closed / abandoned): close the PR(s), then

Bring a feature branch up to date with its base without changing what the branch does: capture a pre-rebase check baseline, fetch, rebase onto the latest base, resolve each conflict from both sides' intent with the rationale recorded to disk, re-run the same checks, and treat any

Watch your own pull request for review feedback: undraft it when the cue clearly says it is ready (an ambiguous cue watches the draft), take a baseline snapshot, then poll GitHub in ~31-minute cycles for up to 24 hours and triage new feedback as it arrives — inline review threads

Watch a pull request you are reviewing until your feedback is settled, re-review each settlement, then approve once: poll GitHub in ~31-minute cycles for up to 24 hours until every review thread you opened is resolved and every plain PR comment you posted has a later push behind

Land a reviewed pull request: discover the open PR for the current branch, push any unpushed commits, wait for CI to go green, then squash-merge it so the PR title (which may carry a version) lands as the commit subject. Handles a PR that has fallen behind its base (rebase + forc

Decide the approach before any code is written. The design-author drafts the ~200-line design document, resolving its own open questions autonomously as recorded assumptions, then an adversarial design review gates advancement. Trigger on "design this", "let's align on the approa

Compressed bug-fix pipeline — reproduce, write failing test, minimal fix, verify, and open a draft PR. Skips Question/Research/Design/Structure/Plan phases. Invoke ONLY on explicit pipeline intent — the user says "run the bug-fix pipeline", "team-fix this bug", or runs "/team-fix

Execute the implementation phase. Includes test-first sub-step (writing failing tests, mechanical confirmation gate) and adversarial verification (5 parallel reviewers with hard-gate retry loop). Trigger on "implement this", "execute the plan", or "/team-implement".

Produce the tactical implementation plan from the structure. The plan is an autonomous artifact for the implementer — no approval gate at this phase (the design was already gated by the adversarial design review). Trigger on "plan the implementation", "spell out the steps", or "/

Open the pull request after verification passes. Updates the changelog, optionally surfaces the tracking ticket, and closes out the topic. Trigger on "open the PR", "open a draft PR", or "/team-pr". To land/merge a reviewed PR (wait for CI, then squash-merge) use the separate /sh

Decompose a feature description, ticket, or issue link into the QRSPI Question artifacts (task.md, questions.md). Trigger on "shape this idea", "decompose this task", or "/team-question".

Research a codebase area before making changes. Dispatches parallel read-only agents (file-finder + researcher) that read questions.md only — never task.md. Trigger on "research this", "explore the codebase for", or "/team-research".

Break the reviewed design into vertical slices with verification checkpoints. Runs autonomously and advances to PLAN — no approval gate. Trigger on "slice this up", "break the design into steps", or "/team-structure".

Prepare one or more isolated git worktrees — one per repository the topic touches. Router action — no agent. Trigger on "set up the worktree", "isolate this work", or "/team-worktree".

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Assemble the governance record for a range — commits, overrides, ADRs, sprint auto-decisions, open questions, checkpoint findings — into one dated audit packet. Read-only.

Lightweight Q&A about the project — answer from context and return, no routing, no state change.

Periodic multi-reviewer sweep of the whole codebase — surfaces a triaged checkpoint report.

Sanctioned lane for non-behavioral work — docs-only edits, dependency bumps, reverts. Type-scaled gates; no TDD demanded of prose.

Clean up an already-merged local branch after proving containment. Confirm each discard and preserve unique work.

Show the codeArbiter command catalog — the public command list and what each routes to.

Create a verified local Git commit when committing changes is requested. Not for explaining commit history, drafting a message only, or postponing a commit. Applies every commit gate and never implies a push or PR.

Stop everything and surface a rule conflict — persona vs. docs vs. code. Present both sides and the conflict-hierarchy level; the user resolves. No silent reconciliation.

Audit stale provenance-tracked docs on request. Report first; re-scout or re-baseline only for selected docs.

Build project context from an existing codebase through isolated scouts, resolve gaps, and preserve initialization gates.

Investigate an unexplained defect or unexpected behavior without changing application code. Use for root-cause diagnosis and an evidence-backed handoff. A no-action close records a board note. Not for implementing a known fix, new features, or explanation-only questions.

Develop greenfield project context through a layered interview, preserve decisions, and initialize only after the required gates.

Verify the active host install, package, command ownership, enforcement, and harmless live-fire probe. Read-only.

Start a feature: brainstorm a spec, get it approved, then drive it test-first through the pipeline. The one entry to implementation.

Fix a confirmed bug: a failing regression test first, then a minimal fix, then the rest of the tdd gates.

Opt this repo into codeArbiter — scaffold the root-level .codearbiter/ state store.

Read-only 3-metric governance glance — override rate, small-lane rate, sprint low-confidence ratio — each with a trend arrow vs. the prior 20-commit window.

Sanctioned, logged bypass of a gate or hard rule — one audit line, then proceed.

Open a PR or finish branch disposition; route CI watching and post-merge cleanup to their owners. Merge and discard need explicit authority.

Zero-onboarding, read-only dry-run of the reviewer fleet against the current uncommitted diff. Predicts reviewers, runs the state-free secret scan, writes nothing.

PiG (Pi in Go) is a faithful Go port of upstream Pi, the TypeScript codebase behind the Pi coding agent. It is a parity-bound translation, not a rewrite: upstre…

An AI Agent that lives in your pocket. Local-first and privacy focused.

Unofficial skill that teaches coding agents to build with TypeSafe AI's Jev: typed decisions, calibrated confidence, and prior art from 150+ community projects.

Adaptive Test-time Learning and Autonomous Specialization

Prediction-market trading engine — Wang Transform pricing on 291K+ contracts; paper-traded across Kalshi · Polymarket · Solana DFlow (Jito bundles) · 633 tests

Knowledge Management for Humans and Agents

Open-source Claude Cowork / Codex / WorkBuddy alternative — a local-first AI office agent that turns one request into real PPTX, DOCX, XLSX and HTML files. Runs…

DeepAgent Code: AI coding agent with persistent memory and control plane

Awesome Jev — evidence-graded index of TypeSafe System One: SDKs, MCP tools, agents, apps and open models. 20 languages, rebuilt every 2 hours.

CLI for Telegram — agent-friendly, daemon-based, with webhook event push.

AI deep-research agent that turns any question into a cited report: plans searches, reads real sources, verifies evidence. Self-hosted, multi-provider, Docker-r…

Event-stream AI Agent framework for building your persona bot 🍊

Give the agent a machine. Just not yours. Each AI coding agent gets its own isolated machine with root, Docker, and systemd - active defense detects and stops t…

Local Emperor-style AI agent with Vue WebUI, multi-provider LLMs, streaming chat, tools, skills, memory, and token telemetry.

Open-source AI reverse-engineering agent platform and MCP server for Ghidra, Frida, x64dbg and Rizin — automated PE/APK/binary analysis, CTF and malware researc…

"Never send a human to do a machine's job" - Open Source AI hacking agent

Prismer Cloud

My Personal Blog (Robotics)

Tau Coding Agent - like Pi, but twice as much

Open-source alternative to OpenAI Dots: self-hosted AI chat, tools, approvals, connectors, and computer tasks.