LLM Mart Basic

Use when the user is explicitly working with Quarto, .qmd files, _quarto.yml, Quarto projects, or Quarto features such as callouts, cross-references, citations, Mermaid diagrams, extensions, websites, books, presentations, and reports. Also use for explicit migration from or comp

Deploy or publish Python and R content to a Posit Connect server using rsconnect-python or the R rsconnect package. Handles interactive apps and dashboards, web APIs, rendered documents, and prepared bundles/manifests. Use whenever the user asks to deploy, publish, or redeploy co

Guide for drafting issue closure and decline responses as an open-source package maintainer. Use when helping compose a reply that says "no" to a feature request, closes an issue as won't-fix, redirects a user to a different package, explains why a design choice is intentional, o

Use when the user wants to find, evaluate, audit, or install an open-source AI agent skill or MCP server — e.g. "find an MCP server for Postgres", "is this skill safe to install", "what should I use to scrape a website". Searches a quality-scored, security-graded catalog of ~20K

Generator-evaluator separation and review methodology — loaded by review agents to enforce fresh-context review discipline and gate verdicts; findings from the code, security, and docs reviewers are formatted per the conventional-comments skill. Trigger on "review this diff", "re

Adversarially review a technical design document with fresh context. Dispatches the built-in read-only `Explore` subagent (clean context, no shared history with the design-author) against `docs/plans/<id>/design.md` and presents its verdict — APPROVE, REQUEST CHANGES, or COMMENT.

Tear down local and remote branch state after a pull request is finished, in one of two modes. Mode A (merged): verify the PR actually merged, remove the branch's worktree, resync the default branch, and delete the local branch. Mode B (closed / abandoned): close the PR(s), then

Bring a feature branch up to date with its base without changing what the branch does: capture a pre-rebase check baseline, fetch, rebase onto the latest base, resolve each conflict from both sides' intent with the rationale recorded to disk, re-run the same checks, and treat any

Watch your own pull request for review feedback: undraft it when the cue clearly says it is ready (an ambiguous cue watches the draft), take a baseline snapshot, then poll GitHub in ~31-minute cycles for up to 24 hours and triage new feedback as it arrives — inline review threads

Watch a pull request you are reviewing until your feedback is settled, re-review each settlement, then approve once: poll GitHub in ~31-minute cycles for up to 24 hours until every review thread you opened is resolved and every plain PR comment you posted has a later push behind

Land a reviewed pull request: discover the open PR for the current branch, push any unpushed commits, wait for CI to go green, then squash-merge it so the PR title (which may carry a version) lands as the commit subject. Handles a PR that has fallen behind its base (rebase + forc

Decide the approach before any code is written. The design-author drafts the ~200-line design document, resolving its own open questions autonomously as recorded assumptions, then an adversarial design review gates advancement. Trigger on "design this", "let's align on the approa

Compressed bug-fix pipeline — reproduce, write failing test, minimal fix, verify, and open a draft PR. Skips Question/Research/Design/Structure/Plan phases. Invoke ONLY on explicit pipeline intent — the user says "run the bug-fix pipeline", "team-fix this bug", or runs "/team-fix

Execute the implementation phase. Includes test-first sub-step (writing failing tests, mechanical confirmation gate) and adversarial verification (5 parallel reviewers with hard-gate retry loop). Trigger on "implement this", "execute the plan", or "/team-implement".

Produce the tactical implementation plan from the structure. The plan is an autonomous artifact for the implementer — no approval gate at this phase (the design was already gated by the adversarial design review). Trigger on "plan the implementation", "spell out the steps", or "/

Open the pull request after verification passes. Updates the changelog, optionally surfaces the tracking ticket, and closes out the topic. Trigger on "open the PR", "open a draft PR", or "/team-pr". To land/merge a reviewed PR (wait for CI, then squash-merge) use the separate /sh

Decompose a feature description, ticket, or issue link into the QRSPI Question artifacts (task.md, questions.md). Trigger on "shape this idea", "decompose this task", or "/team-question".

Research a codebase area before making changes. Dispatches parallel read-only agents (file-finder + researcher) that read questions.md only — never task.md. Trigger on "research this", "explore the codebase for", or "/team-research".

Break the reviewed design into vertical slices with verification checkpoints. Runs autonomously and advances to PLAN — no approval gate. Trigger on "slice this up", "break the design into steps", or "/team-structure".

Prepare one or more isolated git worktrees — one per repository the topic touches. Router action — no agent. Trigger on "set up the worktree", "isolate this work", or "/team-worktree".

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

SonarQube 정적분석 실행 및 결과 조회. 코드 품질·보안 핫스팟·커버리지 확인 시 사용.

GitHub 이슈 #$ARGUMENTS 를 처리한다(이슈 우선 워크플로):

이슈/기획서 기준 SDLC 한 사이클(이슈→개발→테스트→검증→PR)을 사람 개입 없이 자동 실행.

GitLab 이슈 #$ARGUMENTS 를 처리한다(이슈 우선 워크플로):

이슈/기획서 기준 SDLC 한 사이클(이슈→개발→테스트→검증→MR)을 사람 개입 없이 자동 실행.

Invoke a repeated task with `/name`. File name = command name (`fix-issue.md` → `/fix-issue`).

Handle issue #$ARGUMENTS (issue-first workflow):

Renders the connection structure of the AGENTS.md ecosystem

Automatically runs one SDLC cycle (issue → development → testing → verification → PR/MR) based on an issue or spec, without human intervention.

Run SonarQube static analysis and check the results. Use to check code quality, security hotspots, or coverage.

Handle GitHub issue #$ARGUMENTS (issue-first workflow):

Automatically runs one SDLC cycle (issue → development → testing → verification → PR) based on an issue or spec, without human intervention.

Handle GitLab issue #$ARGUMENTS (issue-first workflow):

Automatically runs one SDLC cycle (issue → development → testing → verification → MR) based on an issue or spec, without human intervention.

Show Hermes planning-with-files status for the current project.

Start Hermes planning-with-files workflow in the current project.

بدء تخطيط الملفات بنمط Manus. إنشاء task_plan.md و findings.md و progress.md للمهام المعقدة.

Lock the current task_plan.md content with a SHA-256 attestation. Hooks then refuse to inject plan content if the file diverges from the attested hash, blocking silent tampering. Use --show to print the stored hash, --clear to remove the attestation. Available since v2.37.0.

Starte Manus-artige Dateiplanung. Erstelle task_plan.md, findings.md, progress.md für komplexe Aufgaben.

Self-check for the planning-with-files mechanisms that fail silently: plan resolution, hook injection, canonicalizer path shape, attestation state, install surfaces, and per-fire hook latency. Run it whenever hooks seem quiet or after installing on a new machine. Available since v3.6.0.

Ultra-lightweight, open-source, self-hosted personal AI agent framework in Python with WebUI, tools, memory, MCP, multi-agent workflows, automation, and chat ap…

Governance framework for AI coding agents. It runs them through a five-step workflow (plan, build, review, test, ship) where no step counts as done without evid…

Ultimate Multi-Agent OS for Autonomous AI NPCs 2026

Personal AI Agent Hub 2026 — Build Your 24/7 Autonomous Assistant

Proven 2026 Multi-Agent AI Review System – Verdict-Driven Quality Control

Slash API Batch: Cut AI Costs by 50% in 2026

Web dashboard for Hermes Agent — multi-platform AI chat, session management, scheduled jobs, usage analytics

Agent Skills for Solopreneurs

AirLLM dramatically reduces inference memory usage, letting 70B large language models run on a single 4GB GPU card

Zero, your trustworthy AI teammate for real work.

一套 DSH runtime，Desktop、Web 与 TUI 三种开发体验。

Open-source operational advisor for ClickHouse — real-time monitoring plus AI-driven index/partition/materialized-view recommendations.

⚙️ TypeScript Style Guide and Agent Skill. A concise set of conventions and best practices for consistent, maintainable code.

Framework for AI agents to build and maintain a digital brain through Obsidian wiki

Apache Maka (Incubating) is a local-first AI agent workspace. Model messages, tool calls, tool results, permission decisions, and termination events are recorde…

Neo.mjs is a self-evolving software organism: a professional end-to-end AI engineering team whose cross-model swarm inhabits live apps via Neural Link, Active H…

Agentic development harness for Claude Code — SPEC-driven plan/run/sync, TRUST 5 quality gates, model+effort routing, and Claude×GLM multi-LLM cost control. Sin…

NocoBase is an open-source AI + no-code platform for building business systems fast. Instead of generating everything from scratch, AI works on top of productio…

An open-source AI coding agent that lives in your terminal.

PawWork — free, open-source desktop AI agent for macOS and Windows. Alternative to Codex App and Claude Cowork. BYOK with 75+ providers, ChatGPT OAuth, local mo…