LLM Mart Basic

Detects conflicts across multiple Design Docs and provides structured reports. Use when multiple Design Docs exist, or when "consistency/conflict/sync/between documents" is mentioned. Focuses on detection and reporting only, no modifications.

Reviews one document or one ADR batch against governing requirements, repository evidence, and the needs of its next consumer. Use before user approval or when document consistency and completeness need verification.

Verifies changed integration and E2E tests against skeletons, proof obligations, or explicit prompt claims. Use PROACTIVELY after test implementation completes, or when "test review/skeleton verification" is mentioned. Returns quality reports with failing items and fix instructio

Comprehensively collects problem-related information and creates evidence matrix. Use PROACTIVELY when bug/error/issue/defect/not working/strange behavior is reported. Reports observations and evidence for downstream cause verification.

Creates PRD and structures business requirements. Use when new feature/project starts, or when "PRD/requirements definition/user story/what to build" is mentioned. Defines user value and success metrics.

Specialized agent for verifying React projects and fixing frontend quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, type, or fix requests.

Specialized agent for verifying software projects and fixing quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, correctness, or fix requests.

Collects compact scope and cost evidence for requirement confirmation while the user and orchestrator retain requirements, Structural Scale, and document-routing decisions. Use when new requirements, scope, or implementation extent must be confirmed.

Discovers functional scope from existing codebase for reverse documentation. Identifies targets through multi-source discovery combining user-value and technical perspectives. Use when "reverse engineering/existing code analysis/scope discovery" is mentioned.

Reviews implementation for security compliance against an authoritative Design Doc or Work Plan. Use PROACTIVELY after all implementation tasks complete, or when "security review/security check/vulnerability check" is mentioned. Returns structured findings with risk classificatio

Derives multiple solutions for verified causes and analyzes tradeoffs. Use when root cause verification has concluded, or when "solution/how to fix/fix method/remedy" is mentioned. Focuses on solutions from given conclusions without investigation.

Converts an approved Work Plan into the fewest executable implementation task files. Use when work plans are approved and task materialization is needed.

Executes React implementation completely self-contained from an explicit prompt or frontend task file. Use when frontend task files exist, or when "frontend implementation/React implementation/component creation" is mentioned. Asks no questions, executes consistently from investi

Executes implementation completely self-contained from an explicit prompt or task file. Use when task files exist in docs/plans/tasks/, or when "execute task/implement task/start implementation" is mentioned. Asks no questions, executes consistently from investigation to implemen

Creates a scoped frontend ADR batch or one Design Doc from confirmed UI requirements and decision-relevant repository evidence. Use when frontend technical choices or implementation design need an approved artifact.

Creates a scoped ADR batch or one backend/general Design Doc from confirmed requirements and decision-relevant repository evidence. Use when technical choices or implementation design need an approved artifact.

Gathers decision-relevant UI facts from recorded external resources and the existing codebase. Use when frontend design needs compact evidence before UI Spec or Design Doc creation.

Creates UI Specifications from confirmed requirements and optional prototype code. Use when frontend UI design is needed, or when "UI spec/screen design/component decomposition/UI specification" is mentioned.

Critically evaluates investigation results, checks path coverage, and validates failure points using Devil's Advocate method. Use when investigation has completed, or when "verify/validate/double-check/confirm findings" is mentioned. Focuses on verification and conclusion derivat

Creates implementation-focused work plans from approved Design Docs. Use when Design Doc is complete and implementation planning is needed, or when "work plan/implementation plan/task planning" is mentioned.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Discover testnet↔mainnet subnet lineage from repo configs and open a PR for review (pass --dry-run to report only)

Triage raw inbox notes into reviewed repository destinations without deleting their sources.

Audit and rewrite content to remove AI writing patterns

Log a completed piece of content to content/log.md after the user confirms it was published.

Validate a dream artifact, review each proposal, and apply only individually accepted changes.

Run a curator pass against the validated memory directory and produce a proposal artifact.

End a session — log what happened, update state and the decision log, propose memory updates, and check for uncommitted or unpushed work

Find relevant context files by topic. Use when you need to load files for a topic without a slash command, or when a task spans multiple domains.

Inventory and migrate selected Gemini CLI workflows with dry-run review and parity checks.

Find repeated workflows in selected Gemini CLI sessions and draft portable skills after review.

Scan multi-session drift and offer individually reviewed fixes only after explicit approval.

Scan orphaned worktrees and stale branches, then offer explicit approval-gated cleanup.

Guided onboarding or import for durable workspace context

Start a session — load state files, flag staleness, and give a briefing on current priorities, deadlines, and blockers

Create a morning heartbeat from repository state and update the local heartbeat log.

Mid-session checkpoint — append progress to today's session log and update state files if a priority shifted, without ending the session

Maintainer-only. Find every file that would newly ship to adopters, classify each one against the written distribution-boundary categories, default to withhold on no clean match, and ask the maintainer only where the taxonomy does not settle it. Drives the release CLI, which refuses to produce a manifest until every shipping file has an answer.

Audit memory, wiki, and auto-loaded files for duplication, conflicting instructions, and stale content. The default path researches, then asks you a single Apply / Discuss / Decline question; on Apply it applies the report, files any out-of-scope problem as a tech-debt issue, then commits, opens a PR, and merges it on a main-branch run like /update-deps. Pass --apply to re-run the apply-and-publish stage against the most recent report.

Fix the tech-debt backlog, a single issue or a recommended related batch, highest severity then oldest first, on a fresh isolated branch through the audit gate, closing the issue(s) on merge. Pass `list` to see the ordered backlog, `why <issue-number>` to explain the recommendation, or a bare `<issue-number>` to fix that issue directly.

Health-check and auto-heal this project's Claude integration, triage, heal, verify, and report an F-to-A+ grade.

面向中文开发者的 Claude Code Skills / Agents / Plugins 精选与原创技能库｜按场景分类｜复制即装｜持续更新

原生 macOS Git 客户端，以 Agent 驱动仓库管理、审阅与协作。

A 股短线复盘看板：涨停池·连板梯队·龙虎榜·板块资金一屏看完，赚钱效应/晋级率/梯队断层/情绪周期等派生指标纯计算直出（不经过 AI），AI 只把数据串成能读的盘面研判。全本地运行，可用 Claude/Codex 订阅免 API key。| A-share short-term daily-review dashbo…

禁漫天堂 Agent Skills / AI 原生 JMComic 助手：通过 MCP 与 Skills 将 JMComic 注入你的 AI Agent. / AI-powered JMComic assistant for seamless integration with AI Agents via MCP & S…

Pairlet (formerly CC Pocket / cc-pocket) — Continue your local AI coding tasks from phone, tablet, or desktop.

Self-hosted Personal AI + agent runtime in .NET (NativeAOT-friendly)

A self-hosted knowledge platform for humans and AI agents — publish wikis, blogs, and portable Agent Skills.

Notion CLI with AI agent support. Smart queries, Obsidian sync, batch ops, backups, validation and more.

AI Coding Agent Multiplexer

Independent executor–verifier orchestration for software changes.

AI-native, local-first video editor by Ribbi — runs entirely in the browser. Rust/WASM engine, WebGPU compositing, WebCodecs export; humans and LLM agents edit…

Distill your knowledge, memories, and decisions into an open-source, inspectable AI Agent Twin.

🔬 Harness Vibe Research with Self-evolving AI Scientists

Personal AI desktop agent for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android & iOS. Set a goal, it works on its own. Teams (pair two desktops, agents + humans), Agent2Agent, Wo…

Run agents like a company. AgentOS is the native control plane for OpenClaw — manage agents, tasks, models, context, approvals, and runtime visibility from one…

Create Agentic admin panels faster on TypeScript and Vue.js with AdminForth Framework. Setup main CRUD pages within minutes, extend as you need

OpenJudge: A Unified Framework for Holistic Evaluation and Quality Rewards

An ebook reader with a self-evolving agent: it remembers your reading across books, and plugins extend the reader and the agent alike.

A curated list of awesome resources for vibe coding

Agentic Voice Notes for iPhone and macOS - Rust, Dioxus, LanceDB + RIG + SQLite