LLM Mart Basic

Detects conflicts across multiple Design Docs and provides structured reports. Use when multiple Design Docs exist, or when "consistency/conflict/sync/between documents" is mentioned. Focuses on detection and reporting only, no modifications.

Reviews one document or one ADR batch against governing requirements, repository evidence, and the needs of its next consumer. Use before user approval or when document consistency and completeness need verification.

Verifies changed integration and E2E tests against skeletons, proof obligations, or explicit prompt claims. Use PROACTIVELY after test implementation completes, or when "test review/skeleton verification" is mentioned. Returns quality reports with failing items and fix instructio

Comprehensively collects problem-related information and creates evidence matrix. Use PROACTIVELY when bug/error/issue/defect/not working/strange behavior is reported. Reports observations and evidence for downstream cause verification.

Creates PRD and structures business requirements. Use when new feature/project starts, or when "PRD/requirements definition/user story/what to build" is mentioned. Defines user value and success metrics.

Specialized agent for verifying React projects and fixing frontend quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, type, or fix requests.

Specialized agent for verifying software projects and fixing quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, correctness, or fix requests.

Collects compact scope and cost evidence for requirement confirmation while the user and orchestrator retain requirements, Structural Scale, and document-routing decisions. Use when new requirements, scope, or implementation extent must be confirmed.

Discovers functional scope from existing codebase for reverse documentation. Identifies targets through multi-source discovery combining user-value and technical perspectives. Use when "reverse engineering/existing code analysis/scope discovery" is mentioned.

Reviews implementation for security compliance against an authoritative Design Doc or Work Plan. Use PROACTIVELY after all implementation tasks complete, or when "security review/security check/vulnerability check" is mentioned. Returns structured findings with risk classificatio

Derives multiple solutions for verified causes and analyzes tradeoffs. Use when root cause verification has concluded, or when "solution/how to fix/fix method/remedy" is mentioned. Focuses on solutions from given conclusions without investigation.

Converts an approved Work Plan into the fewest executable implementation task files. Use when work plans are approved and task materialization is needed.

Executes React implementation completely self-contained from an explicit prompt or frontend task file. Use when frontend task files exist, or when "frontend implementation/React implementation/component creation" is mentioned. Asks no questions, executes consistently from investi

Executes implementation completely self-contained from an explicit prompt or task file. Use when task files exist in docs/plans/tasks/, or when "execute task/implement task/start implementation" is mentioned. Asks no questions, executes consistently from investigation to implemen

Creates a scoped frontend ADR batch or one Design Doc from confirmed UI requirements and decision-relevant repository evidence. Use when frontend technical choices or implementation design need an approved artifact.

Creates a scoped ADR batch or one backend/general Design Doc from confirmed requirements and decision-relevant repository evidence. Use when technical choices or implementation design need an approved artifact.

Gathers decision-relevant UI facts from recorded external resources and the existing codebase. Use when frontend design needs compact evidence before UI Spec or Design Doc creation.

Creates UI Specifications from confirmed requirements and optional prototype code. Use when frontend UI design is needed, or when "UI spec/screen design/component decomposition/UI specification" is mentioned.

Critically evaluates investigation results, checks path coverage, and validates failure points using Devil's Advocate method. Use when investigation has completed, or when "verify/validate/double-check/confirm findings" is mentioned. Focuses on verification and conclusion derivat

Creates implementation-focused work plans from approved Design Docs. Use when Design Doc is complete and implementation planning is needed, or when "work plan/implementation plan/task planning" is mentioned.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Secular technology trends analysis — technology adoption cycles, disruption risk, strategic positioning

Turnaround vs stagnation analysis — performance inflection detection, operational metrics, leadership impact

Valuation methods analysis — multiples, DCF inputs, PEG integration, valuation assumption extraction

Porter-style competitive positioning analysis — strategic group mapping, differentiation analysis

Peer benchmarking — multi-ticker financial comparison, growth/value matrix, z-score ranking

Sector overview — TAM estimation, competitive concentration (HHI), regulatory landscape

Supply-chain map — supplier/customer dependency, geographic concentration, bottleneck identification

Currency Analysis — macro strategy analysis

Macro Regime — macro strategy analysis

Rate Cycle — macro strategy analysis

3-statement integrated financial model — IS/BS/CFS triangulation, 5 historical + 5 forecast years

Audit an Excel workbook — formula errors, hardcoded cells, calculation arc cross-validation

Trading comps analysis — peer-group selection, trading-multiple triangulation, implied-valuation range

DCF valuation model — 5-10 year projection, WACC construction, sensitivity tables

Earnings preview presentation — 4-6 slide deck with consensus estimates, historical surprises, forward catalysts

LBO model — sources & uses, debt schedule, exit-multiple analysis, sponsor IRR sensitivity

Investment thesis pitch deck — 12-16 slide presentation with sourced footers

Sum-of-the-parts valuation — segment-level multiples, conglomerate discount analysis

XBRL-to-Excel — proper number formatting, frozen headers, named ranges, calculation arc cross-validation

Income Strategies — options and derivatives analysis

Persistent session memory for AI coding agents — local-first, with on-device inference, associative recall, and drift detection. Works with Claude Code, Cursor,…

Run Hermes Agent and OpenClaw on the same WeChat account

An AI co-scientist running on your desktop. Claude Science but better.

Emotion Ball 是一套面向 AI 助手的表情引擎:32 种状态表情全部由纯 SVG 与原生 JavaScript 实时驱动,零框架、零图片资源。AI 侧只需输出一个 emotionId,小球即可切换到对应表情,可直接用作聊天机器人、桌面宠物、悬浮助手的情绪表达层。

Agent communication SDK. The open-source agent communication layer for AI agents — email, WhatsApp, Slack, Discord, Telegram, SMS. Python & TypeScript.

The micro-VM for AI agents — light enough to embed on your laptop, elastic enough to power an agentic cloud.

Give each AI agent its own isolated machine with root, Docker, and systemd. Active defense detects and stops threats automatically.

Webhook integration skills for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot). Step-by-step guidance for setting up webhook receivers, signature verification,…

Token burn reducer and focus keeper for Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, Gemini CLI, and more: surgical read hints, PDF/Office/CSV/markdown file interception, 160+…

RuvNet Brain — a downloadable, source-grounded brain for Claude Code over Reuven Cohen's (rUv's) RuvNet stack: RuVector/RVF, Ruflo, AgentDB, RuLake, SPARC + 21…

💼 One MCP server to search job boards and company career sites

C++ MCP SDK - build Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers and clients in C++ / CPP. Enterprise-grade security, observability, connectivity. Stdio, HTTP+SSE, Stre…

Open-Source AI Presentation Generator and API (Gamma, Canva, Beautiful AI, Decktopus, Presentations AI Alternative)

Secure, Fast, and Extensible Sandbox runtime for AI agents.

Give your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Read & search Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, GitHub, Bilibili, XiaoHongShu — one CLI, zero API fees.

Browser Harness | Self-healing harness that enables LLMs to complete any task.

The World's First Agentic IDE. Visual dashboard: live sessions, task management, code editor, terminal. Epic Swarm parallel workflows. Auto-proceed rules. Autom…

Agenta is a workspace where you and your team build agents and automations.

Terminal Director. One lightweight app, eight features, your whole dev workflow in a single window.

AI turns documents or topics into real, native PowerPoint decks—with native shapes, transitions and animations, data-backed charts and tables on demand, audio n…