LLM Mart Basic

Detects conflicts across multiple Design Docs and provides structured reports. Use when multiple Design Docs exist, or when "consistency/conflict/sync/between documents" is mentioned. Focuses on detection and reporting only, no modifications.

Reviews one document or one ADR batch against governing requirements, repository evidence, and the needs of its next consumer. Use before user approval or when document consistency and completeness need verification.

Verifies changed integration and E2E tests against skeletons, proof obligations, or explicit prompt claims. Use PROACTIVELY after test implementation completes, or when "test review/skeleton verification" is mentioned. Returns quality reports with failing items and fix instructio

Comprehensively collects problem-related information and creates evidence matrix. Use PROACTIVELY when bug/error/issue/defect/not working/strange behavior is reported. Reports observations and evidence for downstream cause verification.

Creates PRD and structures business requirements. Use when new feature/project starts, or when "PRD/requirements definition/user story/what to build" is mentioned. Defines user value and success metrics.

Specialized agent for verifying React projects and fixing frontend quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, type, or fix requests.

Specialized agent for verifying software projects and fixing quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, correctness, or fix requests.

Collects compact scope and cost evidence for requirement confirmation while the user and orchestrator retain requirements, Structural Scale, and document-routing decisions. Use when new requirements, scope, or implementation extent must be confirmed.

Discovers functional scope from existing codebase for reverse documentation. Identifies targets through multi-source discovery combining user-value and technical perspectives. Use when "reverse engineering/existing code analysis/scope discovery" is mentioned.

Reviews implementation for security compliance against an authoritative Design Doc or Work Plan. Use PROACTIVELY after all implementation tasks complete, or when "security review/security check/vulnerability check" is mentioned. Returns structured findings with risk classificatio

Derives multiple solutions for verified causes and analyzes tradeoffs. Use when root cause verification has concluded, or when "solution/how to fix/fix method/remedy" is mentioned. Focuses on solutions from given conclusions without investigation.

Converts an approved Work Plan into the fewest executable implementation task files. Use when work plans are approved and task materialization is needed.

Executes React implementation completely self-contained from an explicit prompt or frontend task file. Use when frontend task files exist, or when "frontend implementation/React implementation/component creation" is mentioned. Asks no questions, executes consistently from investi

Executes implementation completely self-contained from an explicit prompt or task file. Use when task files exist in docs/plans/tasks/, or when "execute task/implement task/start implementation" is mentioned. Asks no questions, executes consistently from investigation to implemen

Creates a scoped frontend ADR batch or one Design Doc from confirmed UI requirements and decision-relevant repository evidence. Use when frontend technical choices or implementation design need an approved artifact.

Creates a scoped ADR batch or one backend/general Design Doc from confirmed requirements and decision-relevant repository evidence. Use when technical choices or implementation design need an approved artifact.

Gathers decision-relevant UI facts from recorded external resources and the existing codebase. Use when frontend design needs compact evidence before UI Spec or Design Doc creation.

Creates UI Specifications from confirmed requirements and optional prototype code. Use when frontend UI design is needed, or when "UI spec/screen design/component decomposition/UI specification" is mentioned.

Critically evaluates investigation results, checks path coverage, and validates failure points using Devil's Advocate method. Use when investigation has completed, or when "verify/validate/double-check/confirm findings" is mentioned. Focuses on verification and conclusion derivat

Creates implementation-focused work plans from approved Design Docs. Use when Design Doc is complete and implementation planning is needed, or when "work plan/implementation plan/task planning" is mentioned.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Setup automated synchronization workflows

Resolve synchronization conflicts automatically

Sync GitHub issues to Linear workspace

Sync Linear tasks to GitHub issues

Link pull requests to Linear tasks

Monitor GitHub-Linear sync health status

Synchronize task status with git commits, ensuring consistency between version control and task tracking.

Simulate system performance under various loads with capacity planning, bottleneck identification, and optimization strategies.

Create Linear tasks from pull requests

Test-driven development workflow with Red-Green-Refactor process and branch management

Balance team workload distribution

Automate changelog testing workflow

Analyze and report test coverage

I need you to create an integration testing plan for $ARGUMENTS

Accelerate scenario testing with rapid iteration cycles, confidence intervals, and compressed decision timelines.

Manage project todos in a todos.md file with add, complete, remove, and list operations

Generate troubleshooting documentation

Deep analysis and problem solving mode

Sets up a professional Unity project with industry-standard structure and configurations

Update current git branch name based on analysis of changes made

Implementation of Podlite markup language

Open-source AI video workbench. Bring any model or your local ComfyUI, and let Claude Code / Codex / Cursor direct it over MCP — storyboard, references, generat…

《深入理解 AI Agent：设计原理与工程实践》（李博杰 著）开源主仓库：全书正文、编译版 PDF 与按章配套代码

Distilly — Distill how they think into reusable Skills for any Agent or Bot. Formerly Colleague Skill（原同事 Skill）.

本地优先的类飞书 Markdown 编辑器,内置可审改的 AI 助手 | Local-first WYSIWYG Markdown editor with a reviewable AI agent

A lightweight all-in-one terminal with 20+ protocols — SSH, RDP, SFTP, databases, Kubernetes and more. With a built-in autonomous AI Agent that plans and runs m…

一款专注于桌宠方向的AIAgent。特点是一键安装、功能齐全、极低开销、完全暴露上下文、全功能插件化、AI自主插件开发、永久唯一会话、类游戏引擎交互策略。具有极高的扩展性和拟人程度上限，非常适合想长期培养和自定义需求高的用户。

Control Gmail, Google Calendar, Docs, Sheets, Slides, Chat, Forms, Tasks, Search & Drive with AI - Comprehensive Google Workspace MCP Server & CLI Tool

一个先接住情绪、再分析关系并给出可执行策略的 Codex 恋爱军师，内置心理、法律、社会、人文、哲学、婚姻家庭与性学知识库，支持多元关系。

AI-powered SRE platform — read-only infrastructure diagnostics with deep investigation, security governance, and team collaboration

An open-source AI desktop companion inspired by Cyrene, combining immersive Chat, personalized long-term memory, and an agentic Work mode.

A local-first AI agent with persistent memory, emotional intelligence, and a peer-to-peer skills economy.

The open-source, multi-agent alternative to Claude Tag. @ any agent, wherever work happens, your agents work alongside your team and each other, learning as the…

Simple LLM service identification - translate IP:Port to Ollama, vLLM, LiteLLM, or 60+ other AI services in seconds

🔥 Official Firecrawl MCP Server - Adds powerful web scraping and search to Cursor, Claude and any other LLM clients.

Claude in Chrome, reverse-engineered and open-source. No domain blocklist. Any Chromium browser. Same 18 MCP tools, same performance.

Agent-native flight & hotel search and booking — MCP server, CLI, and Python/JS SDKs. Hundreds of airlines plus the major booking sites, with per-flight reliabi…

Open-source desktop AI agent for tools, files, knowledge, workflows, and real deliverables.

Open-source AI job search: scan job portals, evaluate listings into a structured A-H report with a global 1-5 score, tailor your CV, track applications — runs l…

Privacy-first Codex skill for discovering, validating, completing, and tracking job applications