LLM Mart Basic

Execute from codebase-scoped analysis through optional ADR decisions to complete Design Doc approval

Investigate problem, verify findings, and derive solutions

Orchestrate the complete implementation lifecycle from requirements to deployment

Create work plan from design document and obtain plan approval

Design Doc compliance and security validation with optional auto-fixes

Update existing design documents (Design Doc / PRD / ADR) with review

Separates the outcome a change must produce from the requirements proposed to reach it, records what the user excluded, and bands cost from structure. Use when a requirement enters a workflow, before design begins.

Guides subagent coordination through implementation workflows. Use when orchestrating multiple agents, managing workflow phases, or determining autonomous execution mode.

Language-agnostic testing principles including TDD, test quality, coverage standards, and test design patterns. Use when writing tests, designing test strategies, or reviewing test quality.

Applies language-agnostic and backend technical decision criteria, anti-pattern detection, debugging, and quality gates. Use when reviewing general/backend implementation choices, code smells, failures, or implementation completeness.

Language-agnostic coding principles for maintainability, readability, and quality. Use when implementing features, refactoring code, or reviewing code quality.

Determines which of PRD, ADR, UI Spec, Design Doc, and Work Plan a change requires, and where each is stored. Use when deciding documentation scope, or when creating or reviewing a technical document.

Records where resources outside the repository live (design source, design system, API schema, IaC source, secret store) and how design, implementation, and verification reach them. Use when work depends on an external resource, or when the user mentions design source, design sys

Applies React/TypeScript-specific technical decision criteria, anti-pattern detection, debugging, and frontend quality gates. Use when reviewing components, hooks, browser behavior, or frontend implementation completeness.

Implementation strategy selection framework. Use when planning implementation strategy, selecting development approach, or defining verification criteria.

Integration and E2E test design principles, ROI calculation, test skeleton specification, and review criteria. Use when designing integration tests, E2E tests, or reviewing test quality.

Clarifies inputs, outputs, success criteria, decisions, and unresolved conditions so downstream consumers can execute without guessing. Use when writing or revising LLM-facing prompts, handoffs, planning artifacts, reviews, reports, or generated instructions.

Investigate problem, verify findings, and derive solutions

Adjust an already-implemented UI in-session with verification against the design source

Execute materialized frontend task files in autonomous execution mode

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:refactor}}

{{SKILL_ENTRY:release}}

Review a diff with the reviewer fleet, funneled to one triaged verdict. Targets the current working diff, a path, or an inbound GitHub PR.

Exploratory spike on a throwaway branch — answer a named question with disposable code. Never merges; exits to a findings note or {{CMD:feature}}.

Autonomous sprint — one interactive spec gate, then plan-to-PR execution with every auto-decision SMARTS-scored and logged. Hard gates remain true stops.

Daily repo hygiene — review the day's repo state, then perform the cleanups under per-action confirmation. Fast-forward only, never destructive without a yes.

Show the project's current state at a glance — stage, open tasks, open questions, overrides since the last checkpoint, current branch. Read-only.

Wire codeArbiter's statusline into ~/.claude/settings.json, or remove it.

The sanctioned task-board mutator — add a queued task, start one (flips to in-progress and stamps the date, minting a dotted ID on pick-up), or mark an in-progress task done. The only blessed write to open-tasks.md.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:security-architecture}}

{{SKILL_ENTRY:tribunal}}

Watch a PR's CI to completion — diagnose on red, notify and offer the merge on green. Never auto-merges.

Copy a file OUT of a running sandbox box to the host — host-initiated egress only (docker cp). The reverse, a host→container bind, is impossible by construction.

Tear down a sandbox box — remove its container and named volume. --keep-volume leaves the volume; with no id, prune reclaims any leaked ca.sandbox=1-labeled object. Cached images are retained.

Run a single command inside a running sandbox box and capture a JSON result — exitCode, separate stdout/stderr, and a truncated flag past the byte cap. The scriptable exec seam.

Open an interactive shell inside a running sandbox box at /work/repo. Read-only root, non-root user, no host-FS access — explore the untrusted code interactively, then exit.

Pull an untrusted repo into an ephemeral, host-FS-isolated Docker container — clone into a named volume, build a dep-cached image, run under structural isolation. Network defaults to offline. Requires Docker and nixpacks.

Vet a new or changed third-party dependency for license, provenance, and supply-chain risk before any install runs.

Inspect ADR health read-only; optionally select one ADR with --adr N.

Record user-decided ADRs or inspect their health read-only. Preserve attribution and acceptance evidence.

Ultra-lightweight, open-source, self-hosted personal AI agent framework in Python with WebUI, tools, memory, MCP, multi-agent workflows, automation, and chat ap…

Governance framework for AI coding agents. It runs them through a five-step workflow (plan, build, review, test, ship) where no step counts as done without evid…

Ultimate Multi-Agent OS for Autonomous AI NPCs 2026

Personal AI Agent Hub 2026 — Build Your 24/7 Autonomous Assistant

Proven 2026 Multi-Agent AI Review System – Verdict-Driven Quality Control

Slash API Batch: Cut AI Costs by 50% in 2026

Web dashboard for Hermes Agent — multi-platform AI chat, session management, scheduled jobs, usage analytics

Agent Skills for Solopreneurs

AirLLM dramatically reduces inference memory usage, letting 70B large language models run on a single 4GB GPU card

Zero, your trustworthy AI teammate for real work.

一套 DSH runtime，Desktop、Web 与 TUI 三种开发体验。

Open-source operational advisor for ClickHouse — real-time monitoring plus AI-driven index/partition/materialized-view recommendations.

⚙️ TypeScript Style Guide and Agent Skill. A concise set of conventions and best practices for consistent, maintainable code.

Framework for AI agents to build and maintain a digital brain through Obsidian wiki

Apache Maka (Incubating) is a local-first AI agent workspace. Model messages, tool calls, tool results, permission decisions, and termination events are recorde…

Neo.mjs is a self-evolving software organism: a professional end-to-end AI engineering team whose cross-model swarm inhabits live apps via Neural Link, Active H…

Agentic development harness for Claude Code — SPEC-driven plan/run/sync, TRUST 5 quality gates, model+effort routing, and Claude×GLM multi-LLM cost control. Sin…

NocoBase is an open-source AI + no-code platform for building business systems fast. Instead of generating everything from scratch, AI works on top of productio…

An open-source AI coding agent that lives in your terminal.

PawWork — free, open-source desktop AI agent for macOS and Windows. Alternative to Codex App and Claude Cowork. BYOK with 75+ providers, ChatGPT OAuth, local mo…