LLM Mart Basic

Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.

Migrate test files from `as` type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn. Use when user mentions shoehorn, wants to replace `as` in tests, or needs partial test data.

Multi-agent orchestration patterns. Use when multiple independent tasks can run with different domain expertise or when comprehensive analysis requires multiple perspectives.

Structured task planning with clear breakdowns, dependencies, and verification criteria. Use when implementing features, refactoring, or any multi-step work.

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

Create exercise directory structures with sections, problems, solutions, and explainers that pass linting. Use when user wants to scaffold exercises, create exercise stubs, or set up a new course section.

Set up Husky pre-commit hooks with lint-staged (Prettier), type checking, and tests in the current repo. Use when user wants to add pre-commit hooks, set up Husky, configure lint-staged, or add commit-time formatting/typechecking/testing.

Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module, with implementation hidden in subfolders and reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.

Use when starting a new feature, product, or system design. Eliminates the spec-implementation gap by making specifications the primary artifact that drives code generation. Keywords: SDD, spec-driven, PRD, feature spec, user stories, implementation plan, specification, acceptanc

Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session

Teach the user a new skill or concept, within this workspace.

Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code

Turn a decision you can't fully answer into a questionnaire for someone else to fill in.

Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - creates isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification

Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

Stop. That last message did not land: re-pitch it.

Writing, exploit; assemble raw material into a journey of beats, grounding each term before a beat leans on it.

Writing documents for agents. Use when creating or editing skills, or modifying AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Discover testnet↔mainnet subnet lineage from repo configs and open a PR for review (pass --dry-run to report only)

Triage raw inbox notes into reviewed repository destinations without deleting their sources.

Audit and rewrite content to remove AI writing patterns

Log a completed piece of content to content/log.md after the user confirms it was published.

Validate a dream artifact, review each proposal, and apply only individually accepted changes.

Run a curator pass against the validated memory directory and produce a proposal artifact.

End a session — log what happened, update state and the decision log, propose memory updates, and check for uncommitted or unpushed work

Find relevant context files by topic. Use when you need to load files for a topic without a slash command, or when a task spans multiple domains.

Inventory and migrate selected Gemini CLI workflows with dry-run review and parity checks.

Find repeated workflows in selected Gemini CLI sessions and draft portable skills after review.

Scan multi-session drift and offer individually reviewed fixes only after explicit approval.

Scan orphaned worktrees and stale branches, then offer explicit approval-gated cleanup.

Guided onboarding or import for durable workspace context

Start a session — load state files, flag staleness, and give a briefing on current priorities, deadlines, and blockers

Create a morning heartbeat from repository state and update the local heartbeat log.

Mid-session checkpoint — append progress to today's session log and update state files if a priority shifted, without ending the session

Maintainer-only. Find every file that would newly ship to adopters, classify each one against the written distribution-boundary categories, default to withhold on no clean match, and ask the maintainer only where the taxonomy does not settle it. Drives the release CLI, which refuses to produce a manifest until every shipping file has an answer.

Audit memory, wiki, and auto-loaded files for duplication, conflicting instructions, and stale content. The default path researches, then asks you a single Apply / Discuss / Decline question; on Apply it applies the report, files any out-of-scope problem as a tech-debt issue, then commits, opens a PR, and merges it on a main-branch run like /update-deps. Pass --apply to re-run the apply-and-publish stage against the most recent report.

Fix the tech-debt backlog, a single issue or a recommended related batch, highest severity then oldest first, on a fresh isolated branch through the audit gate, closing the issue(s) on merge. Pass `list` to see the ordered backlog, `why <issue-number>` to explain the recommendation, or a bare `<issue-number>` to fix that issue directly.

Health-check and auto-heal this project's Claude integration, triage, heal, verify, and report an F-to-A+ grade.

Your efficient agentic AI coding CLI assistant

AI coding with Aegis governance built into execution: baseline-aware changes, evidence-backed delivery. Free desktop client, your choice of model. 将哲科思维融入 AI 开发…

Android in docker solution with noVNC supported, video recording, mcp server and AI-agent