LLM Mart Basic

Use when a PR has review feedback and the user wants it addressed — pull the review comments, triage each one, apply the changes it warrants, then commit, push, and post a humanized reply per comment. Closes the loop between a review and the follow-up commit; it does not re-revie

Use when the user wants to record an architectural decision — drafting an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) or RFC, documenting a design choice and its trade-offs, or capturing why an approach was taken. Detects the repo's existing ADR location and template style (MADR or Nygard

Use when the user reports an error, bug, or unexpected behavior in this repo and wants help diagnosing it. Five phases — reproduce, diagnose root cause (read-only), write a failing test, fix, verify against the full suite. Also known as `klaussy-debug`.

Use when the user wants to upgrade the project's dependencies safely — bump versions, read changelogs for breaking changes, and verify the suite still passes. Upgrades incrementally and stops on the first break; it does not add new dependencies (that's a design decision to raise

Use when the user wants documentation written or updated — docstrings, API docs, a README section, or a doc comment on a tricky piece of code. Documents selectively: what a reader genuinely can't infer from the code, and nothing they can. Writes prose, not code changes. Also know

Use when the user wants lint, format, and type errors fixed in the current changes. Reads CLAUDE.md for the repo's lint/format/type-check commands, runs each, and fixes only style/format/type issues — no behavior changes. Also known as `klaussy-fix`.

Use when the user is tired of approving the same routine dev work ("stop asking me yes", "allow the normal dev tools", "grant permissions"). Detects the repo's stack and writes a curated allow-list into the agent's own local permission file so the basics stop prompting — reading,

Use whenever prose, a comment, a doc, a PR or commit body, or a file's text should read like a human engineer wrote it instead of an AI — "humanize this", "make it sound less like a bot", "does this read AI-written?", or before shipping prose a human will read. Rewrites in four p

Use when the user pastes a ticket, design doc, or task description and wants it implemented. Multi-phase flow — understand, investigate (in plan mode), plan, implement, verify. Enforces strict scope rules and writes failing tests first for bug fixes. Also known as `klaussy-implem

Use when the user wants a new git worktree created for a task. Picks a kebab-case branch name with a fix/feat/chore/docs/refactor prefix, runs `git worktree add` from the configured base branch, and reports the new path. Also known as `klaussy-new-worktree`.

Use when reviewing a staged diff or an about-to-commit/push change for last-mile issues — silent failures, leaked secrets, debug leftovers, blatant correctness landmines, and excessive/narrating comments. Reports findings on the changed lines only; it does not refactor or rewrite

Use when the user wants the current change QA'd and PR-ready evidence captured. Classifies the diff and runs the verification that actually fits it — screen recordings and screenshots for UI/frontend changes, endpoint or e2e runs for backend, command output for a CLI, tests for a

Use when the user wants to restructure code while preserving behavior exactly. Establishes a passing test baseline first, then makes incremental moves that each leave the suite green. Refuses to change behavior and structure in the same step. Also known as `klaussy-refactor`.

Use when the user wants to cut a release — bump the version, update the changelog from conventional commits, and tag. Detects where the version lives, derives the next version from the commits since the last tag, and stages the release locally; it does not push or publish unless

Use when designing or analyzing a controlled experiment — falsifiable hypothesis, sample size from an MDE, reading significance/CI/power, CUPED, or rescuing tests that won't go significant. NOT recurring metric tracking (that is `analytics`), NOT north-star/KPI trees (that is `kp

Use when making a web UI conform to WCAG 2.2 Level AA — axe-core or Lighthouse a11y violations, keyboard operability, focus management, ARIA roles/names/live regions, contrast, tap-target size. NOT palette or visual intent (that is `design`), NOT test-runner setup (that is `testi

Use when running or fixing paid acquisition on Google or Meta — campaign structure (Performance Max, Demand Gen, Search, Advantage+), platform-fit creative, budget/scaling rules, break-even ROAS math, and Consent Mode v2 / CAPI tracking gaps. NOT the page the ad clicks into (that

Use when measuring whether an LLM or agent system actually got better and gating merges on it: golden sets, fixing an inflated LLM-as-judge, scoring RAG (faithfulness, contextual recall) or agent trajectories (tool correctness, completion), or picking an eval framework. NOT build

Use when bounding an LLM agent that already runs — scoping its task domain, gating tools to least privilege, defending against prompt injection in untrusted web/email/RAG text, requiring human approval on irreversible actions, capping runtime and cost, or triaging what it already

Use when a creative goal must become a finished media file: pick and order generative-media models per modality — AI voiceover, image-to-video clips, score — then glue them with ffmpeg (mux, duck, loudnorm, concat). NOT still-image generation/editing (that is `replicate-images`);

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Periodic multi-reviewer sweep of the whole codebase — surfaces a triaged checkpoint report.

Sanctioned lane for non-behavioral work — docs-only edits, dependency bumps, reverts. Type-scaled gates; no TDD demanded of prose.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:post-merge-cleanup}}

Show the codeArbiter command catalog — the public command list and what each routes to.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:commit-gate}}

Stop everything and surface a rule conflict — persona vs. docs vs. code. Present both sides and the conflict-hierarchy level; the user resolves. No silent reconciliation.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:context-check}}

{{SKILL_ENTRY:context-creation}}

{{SKILL_ENTRY:debug}}

{{SKILL_ENTRY:decompose}}

Verify the active host install, package, command ownership, enforcement{{IF:pi}}, wrapper self-test, and active-dispatch coverage gap{{ELSE}}, and harmless live-fire probe{{END}}. Read-only.

Start a feature: brainstorm a spec, get it approved, then drive it test-first through the pipeline. The one entry to implementation.

Fix a confirmed bug: a failing regression test first, then a minimal fix, then the rest of the tdd gates.

Opt this repo into codeArbiter — scaffold the root-level .codearbiter/ state store.

Read-only 3-metric governance glance — override rate, small-lane rate, sprint low-confidence ratio — each with a trend arrow vs. the prior 20-commit window.

Sanctioned, logged bypass of a gate or hard rule — one audit line, then proceed.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:finishing-a-development-branch}}

Zero-onboarding, read-only dry-run of the reviewer fleet against the current uncommitted diff. Predicts reviewers, runs the state-free secret scan, writes nothing.

Trim transcript clutter to extend session lifetime — analyze, prune a copy, or toggle the after-each-turn service. Dry-run by default; gains land at resume/compaction, not the current turn.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:decision-variance}}

AI skill for OpenClaw & Claude Code — recommend from 10000+ Nano Banana Pro (Gemini) image prompts. Smart search by use case, content remix, sample images.

嘉立创EDA专业版(EasyEDA Pro)自动化：给 AI harness 装上画板的「手」—— 一套 typed 原理图/PCB 动作，CLI / Agent Skill / stdio MCP 三形态融合接入。承接嘉立创「不以卖板赚钱，以培养中国工程师为己任」 | EasyEDA Pro automation:…

Claude Code session log viewer for JSONL files in ~/.claude/projects. Browse conversations, tool calls, tokens, and live tail sessions on desktop, web, and TUI.

Shared memory MCP server — persistent, searchable, cross-client Claude, Opencode

OpenAI Codex CLI session log viewer for JSONL files in ~/.codex/sessions. Browse conversations, tool calls, tokens, collaboration chains, and live sessions on d…

High-performance Google Drive CLI and Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server for LLM/AI agents. Natively execute Google Apps Script (GAS) under a secure whiteliste…

"Vibe-Trading: Your Personal Trading Agent"

Local-first chat history analyzer with AI. | 本地优先的 AI 聊天记录分析工具

Official Oxylabs MCP integration

Persistent memory for Claude Code & Codex CLI. Auto-extracted knowledge graph, multi-representation embeddings, 3D WebGL visualization. LongMemEval R@5=97.45%.…

One person, a team of agents. Multi-session CLI that collaborates across terminals; /goal keeps long tasks running; WeChat/WeCom/Feishu gateway lets you call th…

AI 基础知识 - GPU 架构、CUDA 编程、大模型基础及AI Agent 相关知识。

Self-hosted, open-source agent skill registry for enterprises. Publish & version skill packages, govern with RBAC and audit logs, deploy on-premise with Docke…

深度调研报告生成 Skill — 一条命令，十分钟出券商级深度调研报告 / Professional deep research report generation Skill · Supports 19 languages

The OKF toolkit for Claude Code — author, maintain, validate & visualize Open Knowledge Format bundles. Plugin, agent skills, and a GitHub Action.

Autonomous AI pentesting agents — real-time reconnaissance, vulnerability detection, and exploitation orchestration. Go + TypeScript.

Native macOS and iOS App for the Hermes AI agent — multi-window, multi-server (local + remote over SSH). Chat, dashboard, sessions, memory, cron, MCP, and more.

Multiplayer Claude Code and Codex. Self-hosted team workspace for Claude Code and Codex. Multi-user, browser-based, AI mates with memory.

Every past session, subagent, and workflow -- queryable by your agent, browsable by you

盯盘侠 PanWatch · 自托管 AI 盯盘助手，集成 TradingAgents 多 Agent 投资决策 | A股/港股/美股实时监控、持仓管理、智能分析、全渠道推送