LLM Mart Basic

Use when a PR has review feedback and the user wants it addressed — pull the review comments, triage each one, apply the changes it warrants, then commit, push, and post a humanized reply per comment. Closes the loop between a review and the follow-up commit; it does not re-revie

Use when the user wants to record an architectural decision — drafting an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) or RFC, documenting a design choice and its trade-offs, or capturing why an approach was taken. Detects the repo's existing ADR location and template style (MADR or Nygard

Use when the user reports an error, bug, or unexpected behavior in this repo and wants help diagnosing it. Five phases — reproduce, diagnose root cause (read-only), write a failing test, fix, verify against the full suite. Also known as `klaussy-debug`.

Use when the user wants to upgrade the project's dependencies safely — bump versions, read changelogs for breaking changes, and verify the suite still passes. Upgrades incrementally and stops on the first break; it does not add new dependencies (that's a design decision to raise

Use when the user wants documentation written or updated — docstrings, API docs, a README section, or a doc comment on a tricky piece of code. Documents selectively: what a reader genuinely can't infer from the code, and nothing they can. Writes prose, not code changes. Also know

Use when the user wants lint, format, and type errors fixed in the current changes. Reads CLAUDE.md for the repo's lint/format/type-check commands, runs each, and fixes only style/format/type issues — no behavior changes. Also known as `klaussy-fix`.

Use when the user is tired of approving the same routine dev work ("stop asking me yes", "allow the normal dev tools", "grant permissions"). Detects the repo's stack and writes a curated allow-list into the agent's own local permission file so the basics stop prompting — reading,

Use whenever prose, a comment, a doc, a PR or commit body, or a file's text should read like a human engineer wrote it instead of an AI — "humanize this", "make it sound less like a bot", "does this read AI-written?", or before shipping prose a human will read. Rewrites in four p

Use when the user pastes a ticket, design doc, or task description and wants it implemented. Multi-phase flow — understand, investigate (in plan mode), plan, implement, verify. Enforces strict scope rules and writes failing tests first for bug fixes. Also known as `klaussy-implem

Use when the user wants a new git worktree created for a task. Picks a kebab-case branch name with a fix/feat/chore/docs/refactor prefix, runs `git worktree add` from the configured base branch, and reports the new path. Also known as `klaussy-new-worktree`.

Use when reviewing a staged diff or an about-to-commit/push change for last-mile issues — silent failures, leaked secrets, debug leftovers, blatant correctness landmines, and excessive/narrating comments. Reports findings on the changed lines only; it does not refactor or rewrite

Use when the user wants the current change QA'd and PR-ready evidence captured. Classifies the diff and runs the verification that actually fits it — screen recordings and screenshots for UI/frontend changes, endpoint or e2e runs for backend, command output for a CLI, tests for a

Use when the user wants to restructure code while preserving behavior exactly. Establishes a passing test baseline first, then makes incremental moves that each leave the suite green. Refuses to change behavior and structure in the same step. Also known as `klaussy-refactor`.

Use when the user wants to cut a release — bump the version, update the changelog from conventional commits, and tag. Detects where the version lives, derives the next version from the commits since the last tag, and stages the release locally; it does not push or publish unless

Use when designing or analyzing a controlled experiment — falsifiable hypothesis, sample size from an MDE, reading significance/CI/power, CUPED, or rescuing tests that won't go significant. NOT recurring metric tracking (that is `analytics`), NOT north-star/KPI trees (that is `kp

Use when making a web UI conform to WCAG 2.2 Level AA — axe-core or Lighthouse a11y violations, keyboard operability, focus management, ARIA roles/names/live regions, contrast, tap-target size. NOT palette or visual intent (that is `design`), NOT test-runner setup (that is `testi

Use when running or fixing paid acquisition on Google or Meta — campaign structure (Performance Max, Demand Gen, Search, Advantage+), platform-fit creative, budget/scaling rules, break-even ROAS math, and Consent Mode v2 / CAPI tracking gaps. NOT the page the ad clicks into (that

Use when measuring whether an LLM or agent system actually got better and gating merges on it: golden sets, fixing an inflated LLM-as-judge, scoring RAG (faithfulness, contextual recall) or agent trajectories (tool correctness, completion), or picking an eval framework. NOT build

Use when bounding an LLM agent that already runs — scoping its task domain, gating tools to least privilege, defending against prompt injection in untrusted web/email/RAG text, requiring human approval on irreversible actions, capping runtime and cost, or triaging what it already

Use when a creative goal must become a finished media file: pick and order generative-media models per modality — AI voiceover, image-to-video clips, score — then glue them with ffmpeg (mux, duck, loudnorm, concat). NOT still-image generation/editing (that is `replicate-images`);

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Audit project dependencies for vulnerabilities, outdated packages, license conflicts, and supply chain risks — then provide actionable remediation strategies.

Refactor provided code for cleanliness, maintainability, and alignment with SOLID principles and modern best practices — no over-engineering.

Analyze and remediate technical debt — inventory debt items, score by impact, and produce a prioritized remediation plan with estimated effort.

Orchestrate comprehensive multi-dimensional code review using specialized review agents across architecture, security, performance, testing, and best practices

Enhance a pull request with a generated description, review checklist, risk assessment, and test coverage report

Execute tasks from a track's implementation plan following TDD workflow

Manage track lifecycle: archive, restore, delete, rename, and cleanup

Create a new track with specification and phased implementation plan

Git-aware undo by logical work unit (track, phase, or task)

Initialize project with Conductor artifacts (product definition, tech stack, workflow, style guides)

Display project status, active tracks, and next actions

Restore saved project context and decisions to resume a session

Save project context, decisions, and progress for a later session

Build features guided by data insights, A/B testing, and continuous measurement

Design and implement batch and streaming data pipelines with ingestion, orchestration, dbt transformations, data quality checks, and monitoring

Reduce cloud costs across AWS, Azure, and GCP through rightsizing, reserved and spot capacity, storage tuning, and cost monitoring

Migration monitoring, CDC, and observability infrastructure

SQL database migrations with zero-downtime strategies for PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server

AI-assisted smart debugging — parse error messages, stack traces, and failure patterns to identify root causes and produce a fix with automated observability steps.

Audit project dependencies for vulnerabilities, outdated packages, license conflicts, and supply chain risks — then provide actionable remediation strategies.

AI coding platform for teams

AI Multi-Agent Framework in .NET

Production-ready code examples for Telnyx AI Communications Infrastructure — Voice AI, SMS, SIP, and IoT APIs

UltraGameStudio - AI coding agent for game development: engine workflows, gameplay code, and asset generation.

🦞 ResearchClawBench: Evaluating AI Agents for Automated Research from Re-Discovery to New-Discovery

The context-aware model router that learns & adapts to your long-horizon coding agent workflows. Lightweight & extensible, works with any harnesses, any models,…

Open-source sandboxes where coding agents build and deploy. Spin up isolated environments where Claude Code, Cursor, and other agents code and deploy software.

Native desktop UI for Claude Code with orchestration, streaming, background agents, and multi-provider support. Built with Tauri + React.

OpenCode mobile client via Telegram: run and monitor AI coding tasks from your phone while everything runs locally on your machine. Scheduled tasks support.

Terminal session manager for AI coding agents. One TUI for Claude, Gemini, OpenCode, Codex, and more.

Exposes internet search tools for use by LLM-backed Assist in Home Assistant

Templates and workflow for generating PRDs, Tech Designs, and MVP and more using LLMs for AI IDEs

Versus Incident is the self-hosted AI SRE agent. It learns what your system normally look like and escalates only what is new or unexpected issues — routing to…

Browser-native side panel for Hermes Agent — connect web context to your local Hermes runtime.

Agentic-friendly CLI generator for APIs: turn Swagger, OpenAPI, and google.api.http protos into single-binary CLIs with catalogs and generated Skills.

Open-source agent platform for Global × China enterprises — wire every system through one agent core. Self-hosted, any LLM.

Official python implementation of UTCP. UTCP is an open standard that lets AI agents call any API directly, without extra middleware.

An agent small enough to run anywhere. A minimal agentic runtime in C — ~380 lines, 54KB binary, ~2MB RAM. A skill file + an LLM + a shell loop, no framework.

AgentiLoop Agent! An Autonomous Agentic Agent for Mac, and exclusive Apple only harnesss. Suppprtd automation, scripting, coding, build anything and more. Power…

微信公众号 AI 运营助手 | 选题、写稿、审稿、排版、配图、发布全流程 Skill，支持 OpenClaw / Claude Code / Cursor / Codex