LLM Mart Basic

Use when a PR has review feedback and the user wants it addressed — pull the review comments, triage each one, apply the changes it warrants, then commit, push, and post a humanized reply per comment. Closes the loop between a review and the follow-up commit; it does not re-revie

Use when the user wants to record an architectural decision — drafting an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) or RFC, documenting a design choice and its trade-offs, or capturing why an approach was taken. Detects the repo's existing ADR location and template style (MADR or Nygard

Use when the user reports an error, bug, or unexpected behavior in this repo and wants help diagnosing it. Five phases — reproduce, diagnose root cause (read-only), write a failing test, fix, verify against the full suite. Also known as `klaussy-debug`.

Use when the user wants to upgrade the project's dependencies safely — bump versions, read changelogs for breaking changes, and verify the suite still passes. Upgrades incrementally and stops on the first break; it does not add new dependencies (that's a design decision to raise

Use when the user wants documentation written or updated — docstrings, API docs, a README section, or a doc comment on a tricky piece of code. Documents selectively: what a reader genuinely can't infer from the code, and nothing they can. Writes prose, not code changes. Also know

Use when the user wants lint, format, and type errors fixed in the current changes. Reads CLAUDE.md for the repo's lint/format/type-check commands, runs each, and fixes only style/format/type issues — no behavior changes. Also known as `klaussy-fix`.

Use when the user is tired of approving the same routine dev work ("stop asking me yes", "allow the normal dev tools", "grant permissions"). Detects the repo's stack and writes a curated allow-list into the agent's own local permission file so the basics stop prompting — reading,

Use whenever prose, a comment, a doc, a PR or commit body, or a file's text should read like a human engineer wrote it instead of an AI — "humanize this", "make it sound less like a bot", "does this read AI-written?", or before shipping prose a human will read. Rewrites in four p

Use when the user pastes a ticket, design doc, or task description and wants it implemented. Multi-phase flow — understand, investigate (in plan mode), plan, implement, verify. Enforces strict scope rules and writes failing tests first for bug fixes. Also known as `klaussy-implem

Use when the user wants a new git worktree created for a task. Picks a kebab-case branch name with a fix/feat/chore/docs/refactor prefix, runs `git worktree add` from the configured base branch, and reports the new path. Also known as `klaussy-new-worktree`.

Use when reviewing a staged diff or an about-to-commit/push change for last-mile issues — silent failures, leaked secrets, debug leftovers, blatant correctness landmines, and excessive/narrating comments. Reports findings on the changed lines only; it does not refactor or rewrite

Use when the user wants the current change QA'd and PR-ready evidence captured. Classifies the diff and runs the verification that actually fits it — screen recordings and screenshots for UI/frontend changes, endpoint or e2e runs for backend, command output for a CLI, tests for a

Use when the user wants to restructure code while preserving behavior exactly. Establishes a passing test baseline first, then makes incremental moves that each leave the suite green. Refuses to change behavior and structure in the same step. Also known as `klaussy-refactor`.

Use when the user wants to cut a release — bump the version, update the changelog from conventional commits, and tag. Detects where the version lives, derives the next version from the commits since the last tag, and stages the release locally; it does not push or publish unless

Use when designing or analyzing a controlled experiment — falsifiable hypothesis, sample size from an MDE, reading significance/CI/power, CUPED, or rescuing tests that won't go significant. NOT recurring metric tracking (that is `analytics`), NOT north-star/KPI trees (that is `kp

Use when making a web UI conform to WCAG 2.2 Level AA — axe-core or Lighthouse a11y violations, keyboard operability, focus management, ARIA roles/names/live regions, contrast, tap-target size. NOT palette or visual intent (that is `design`), NOT test-runner setup (that is `testi

Use when running or fixing paid acquisition on Google or Meta — campaign structure (Performance Max, Demand Gen, Search, Advantage+), platform-fit creative, budget/scaling rules, break-even ROAS math, and Consent Mode v2 / CAPI tracking gaps. NOT the page the ad clicks into (that

Use when measuring whether an LLM or agent system actually got better and gating merges on it: golden sets, fixing an inflated LLM-as-judge, scoring RAG (faithfulness, contextual recall) or agent trajectories (tool correctness, completion), or picking an eval framework. NOT build

Use when bounding an LLM agent that already runs — scoping its task domain, gating tools to least privilege, defending against prompt injection in untrusted web/email/RAG text, requiring human approval on irreversible actions, capping runtime and cost, or triaging what it already

Use when a creative goal must become a finished media file: pick and order generative-media models per modality — AI voiceover, image-to-video clips, score — then glue them with ffmpeg (mux, duck, loudnorm, concat). NOT still-image generation/editing (that is `replicate-images`);

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Chart a big legal matter as a wayfinder decision map — grill the attorney breadth-first, create the map and decision tickets, fire research tickets in parallel. Planning only: charting resolves no decisions itself.

Define a checkable legal success condition for /legal-loop. Accepts a named profile (citations-clean, draft-passes-gate, adversarial-converge, nda-batch-clean, reg-watch, timeline-sourced) or free-text objective. Produces a persisted Goal Record — never starts work itself.

Iterate a worker-evaluator cycle against a Goal Record until the success condition is met or a stop limit is reached. The evaluator (a different agent than the worker) judges each iteration using MCP verification tools. Produces an auditable verdict trail and a final MET / NOT MET status.

Build a sourced legal chronology from case documents — every event with mandatory provenance, undisputed/alleged/contested status, explicit date conflicts, evidentiary gaps, and optional deadline markers. Outputs table, interactive HTML, and docx under bcc-output/timeline/.

Work one ticket from a legal-wayfinder decision map — claim a frontier ticket, resolve it by type (research / grilling / prototype / task), record the decision, graduate newly-sharp fog, and emit the handoff pack when the map is clear.

Primary entry point for all BetterCallClaude requests — classifies intent, resolves jurisdiction (via swiss-legal-research), runs inline briefing for complexity 4–6, activates full briefing session when complexity ≥ 7 (via legal-intake skill), and routes to specialist agents or workflow pipelines. Invoked explicitly as /bettercallclaude:legal or as the default when no other command matches. Supports --refine, --briefing, --skip-briefing/--direct, --no-framework flags.

Triage NDAs against Swiss law — classify as GREEN (standard) / YELLOW (review) / RED (issues) using playbook thresholds and Swiss legal criteria. Supports single file or batch (folder) mode.

Search and analyze Swiss BGE/ATF/DTF precedents with precedent chain tracking and evolution analysis

View or change the BetterCallClaude privacy mode (strict/balanced/cloud)

Refine vague legal queries into structured prompts through Socratic dialogue, with workflow recommendations and multi-lingual terminology guidance

Search Swiss legal precedents (BGE/ATF/DTF), analyze statutes, and verify citations with multi-lingual support

Check MCP server connectivity

Welcome and first-use onboarding — checks MCP connectivity, guides playbook creation, shows usage examples tailored to your profile. Replaces /setup.

Develop litigation strategy with risk assessment, procedural analysis, cost-benefit calculation, and settlement evaluation for Swiss courts

Summarize and consolidate multi-agent pipeline output -- deduplicate disclaimers, terminology, and citations with length control (--short, --medium, --long)

Translate Swiss legal documents between DE, FR, IT, and EN while preserving legal terminology precision

Validate Swiss legal citations in bulk -- check format, existence, and cross-language consistency

Display BetterCallClaude plugin version, installed components, and system status

Define and execute multi-agent legal workflows -- due diligence, litigation prep, contract lifecycle, real estate closing

Audit web accessibility for WCAG compliance with automated axe-core tests, keyboard and screen reader checks, and remediation guidance

Persistent session memory for AI coding agents — local-first, with on-device inference, associative recall, and drift detection. Works with Claude Code, Cursor,…

Run Hermes Agent and OpenClaw on the same WeChat account

An AI co-scientist running on your desktop. Claude Science but better.

Emotion Ball 是一套面向 AI 助手的表情引擎:32 种状态表情全部由纯 SVG 与原生 JavaScript 实时驱动,零框架、零图片资源。AI 侧只需输出一个 emotionId,小球即可切换到对应表情,可直接用作聊天机器人、桌面宠物、悬浮助手的情绪表达层。

Agent communication SDK. The open-source agent communication layer for AI agents — email, WhatsApp, Slack, Discord, Telegram, SMS. Python & TypeScript.

The micro-VM for AI agents — light enough to embed on your laptop, elastic enough to power an agentic cloud.

Give each AI agent its own isolated machine with root, Docker, and systemd. Active defense detects and stops threats automatically.

Webhook integration skills for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot). Step-by-step guidance for setting up webhook receivers, signature verification,…

Token burn reducer and focus keeper for Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, Gemini CLI, and more: surgical read hints, PDF/Office/CSV/markdown file interception, 160+…

RuvNet Brain — a downloadable, source-grounded brain for Claude Code over Reuven Cohen's (rUv's) RuvNet stack: RuVector/RVF, Ruflo, AgentDB, RuLake, SPARC + 21…

💼 One MCP server to search job boards and company career sites

C++ MCP SDK - build Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers and clients in C++ / CPP. Enterprise-grade security, observability, connectivity. Stdio, HTTP+SSE, Stre…

Open-Source AI Presentation Generator and API (Gamma, Canva, Beautiful AI, Decktopus, Presentations AI Alternative)

Secure, Fast, and Extensible Sandbox runtime for AI agents.

Give your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Read & search Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, GitHub, Bilibili, XiaoHongShu — one CLI, zero API fees.

Browser Harness | Self-healing harness that enables LLMs to complete any task.

The World's First Agentic IDE. Visual dashboard: live sessions, task management, code editor, terminal. Epic Swarm parallel workflows. Auto-proceed rules. Autom…

Agenta is a workspace where you and your team build agents and automations.

Terminal Director. One lightweight app, eight features, your whole dev workflow in a single window.

AI turns documents or topics into real, native PowerPoint decks—with native shapes, transitions and animations, data-backed charts and tables on demand, audio n…