LLM Mart Basic
@llm-mart · Joined Jun 2026
Use when a PR has review feedback and the user wants it addressed — pull the review comments, triage each one, apply the changes it warrants, then commit, push, and post a humanized reply per comment. Closes the loop between a review and the follow-up commit; it does not re-revie
Use when the user wants to record an architectural decision — drafting an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) or RFC, documenting a design choice and its trade-offs, or capturing why an approach was taken. Detects the repo's existing ADR location and template style (MADR or Nygard
Use when the user reports an error, bug, or unexpected behavior in this repo and wants help diagnosing it. Five phases — reproduce, diagnose root cause (read-only), write a failing test, fix, verify against the full suite. Also known as `klaussy-debug`.
Use when the user wants to upgrade the project's dependencies safely — bump versions, read changelogs for breaking changes, and verify the suite still passes. Upgrades incrementally and stops on the first break; it does not add new dependencies (that's a design decision to raise
Use when the user wants documentation written or updated — docstrings, API docs, a README section, or a doc comment on a tricky piece of code. Documents selectively: what a reader genuinely can't infer from the code, and nothing they can. Writes prose, not code changes. Also know
Use when the user wants lint, format, and type errors fixed in the current changes. Reads CLAUDE.md for the repo's lint/format/type-check commands, runs each, and fixes only style/format/type issues — no behavior changes. Also known as `klaussy-fix`.
Use when the user is tired of approving the same routine dev work ("stop asking me yes", "allow the normal dev tools", "grant permissions"). Detects the repo's stack and writes a curated allow-list into the agent's own local permission file so the basics stop prompting — reading,
Use whenever prose, a comment, a doc, a PR or commit body, or a file's text should read like a human engineer wrote it instead of an AI — "humanize this", "make it sound less like a bot", "does this read AI-written?", or before shipping prose a human will read. Rewrites in four p
Use when the user pastes a ticket, design doc, or task description and wants it implemented. Multi-phase flow — understand, investigate (in plan mode), plan, implement, verify. Enforces strict scope rules and writes failing tests first for bug fixes. Also known as `klaussy-implem
Use when the user wants a new git worktree created for a task. Picks a kebab-case branch name with a fix/feat/chore/docs/refactor prefix, runs `git worktree add` from the configured base branch, and reports the new path. Also known as `klaussy-new-worktree`.
Use when reviewing a staged diff or an about-to-commit/push change for last-mile issues — silent failures, leaked secrets, debug leftovers, blatant correctness landmines, and excessive/narrating comments. Reports findings on the changed lines only; it does not refactor or rewrite
Use when the user wants the current change QA'd and PR-ready evidence captured. Classifies the diff and runs the verification that actually fits it — screen recordings and screenshots for UI/frontend changes, endpoint or e2e runs for backend, command output for a CLI, tests for a
Use when the user wants to restructure code while preserving behavior exactly. Establishes a passing test baseline first, then makes incremental moves that each leave the suite green. Refuses to change behavior and structure in the same step. Also known as `klaussy-refactor`.
Use when the user wants to cut a release — bump the version, update the changelog from conventional commits, and tag. Detects where the version lives, derives the next version from the commits since the last tag, and stages the release locally; it does not push or publish unless
Use when designing or analyzing a controlled experiment — falsifiable hypothesis, sample size from an MDE, reading significance/CI/power, CUPED, or rescuing tests that won't go significant. NOT recurring metric tracking (that is `analytics`), NOT north-star/KPI trees (that is `kp
Use when making a web UI conform to WCAG 2.2 Level AA — axe-core or Lighthouse a11y violations, keyboard operability, focus management, ARIA roles/names/live regions, contrast, tap-target size. NOT palette or visual intent (that is `design`), NOT test-runner setup (that is `testi
Use when running or fixing paid acquisition on Google or Meta — campaign structure (Performance Max, Demand Gen, Search, Advantage+), platform-fit creative, budget/scaling rules, break-even ROAS math, and Consent Mode v2 / CAPI tracking gaps. NOT the page the ad clicks into (that
Use when measuring whether an LLM or agent system actually got better and gating merges on it: golden sets, fixing an inflated LLM-as-judge, scoring RAG (faithfulness, contextual recall) or agent trajectories (tool correctness, completion), or picking an eval framework. NOT build
Use when bounding an LLM agent that already runs — scoping its task domain, gating tools to least privilege, defending against prompt injection in untrusted web/email/RAG text, requiring human approval on irreversible actions, capping runtime and cost, or triaging what it already
Use when a creative goal must become a finished media file: pick and order generative-media models per modality — AI voiceover, image-to-video clips, score — then glue them with ffmpeg (mux, duck, loudnorm, concat). NOT still-image generation/editing (that is `replicate-images`);
Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes
Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds
Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.
Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.
A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.
A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.
None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.
Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.
Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen
CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.
Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it
An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server
31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions
The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.
Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.
Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.
"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks
stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.
The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.
Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.
/story-cover
Story cover
网文封面生成。分析书名题材,生成专业封面图。
/story-deslop
Story deslop
网文去AI味。检测并清除文本中的AI写作痕迹,让文字回归自然。
/story-import
Story import
逆向导入已有小说。将已写好的小说反向解析为标准项目目录结构。
/story-long-analyze
Story long analyze
长篇网文拆文。深度拆解爆款长篇小说的黄金三章、人设、爽点、节奏。
/story-long-scan
Story long scan
长篇网文扫榜。分析起点、番茄、晋江等平台排行数据,提炼市场趋势。
/story-long-write
Story long write
长篇网文写作。从大纲到正文,辅助长篇网络小说的创作。
/story-review
Story review
多视角对抗式审查。使用多个 Agent 对作品进行多维度审稿。
/story-setup
Story setup
网文写作环境部署与检查。部署 hooks、rules、agents、项目指令等基础设施;传入 check 只检查不改动。
/story-short-analyze
Story short analyze
短篇网文拆文。拆解爆款短篇的故事核、结构、情感线和反转设计。
/story-short-scan
Story short scan
短篇网文扫榜。分析知乎盐言、番茄短篇等平台热门数据。
/story-short-write
Story short write
短篇网文写作。辅助短篇小说创作,从构思到成稿。
/story
Story
网文工具箱路由入口。根据模糊意图自动分发到对应的写作、拆文或扫榜工具。
/browser-cdp
Browser cdp
浏览器操控。通过 CDP 复用 Chrome 登录态执行浏览器自动化。
/story-cover
Story cover
小说封面生成。根据书名、作者名和题材生成专业网文封面。
/story-deslop
Story deslop
网文去 AI 味。检测并清理模板化、解释腔和过度工整表达。
/story-import
Story import
逆向导入已有小说,将成稿或半成品解析为可续写项目。
/story-long-analyze
Story long analyze
长篇网文拆文,分析黄金三章、人设、爽点和长线节奏。
/story-long-scan
Story long scan
长篇网文扫榜,分析起点、番茄、晋江等平台趋势。
/story-long-write
Story long write
长篇网文写作,从选题、大纲到逐章正文和持续追踪。
/story-review
Story review
多视角小说审查;ZCode 项目 agents 不可用时自动降级 solo。
Your Personal AI Assistant; easy to install, deploy on your own machine or on the cloud; supports multiple chat apps with easily extensible capabilities.
16 views 0 likesAgent OS: the agent gets smarter on its own. We just hold the line: the grading command and expected result never make it into the success contract we hand it.…
17 views 0 likesCurated systems, benchmarks, and papers etc. on memory for LLMs/MLLMs --- long-term context, retrieval, and reasoning.
14 views 0 likes:memo: Vimlike Modal Text Editor in Rust
27 views 0 likesCI-native security testing for MCP servers. Attack simulation, schema drift detection, and health scoring before agents depend on them.
16 views 0 likesHermes Agent memory plugin/provider for scope-aware recall, SQLite truth, LanceDB semantic search, and hybrid retrieval.
15 views 0 likesFor You Agent——AI 时代的个人随身数字人格。把你的模型、AI 账号、技能、提示词和工作方式,带到每一个 AI 工具里。
12 views 0 likesA coding agent: give it a prompt and it reads, writes, runs commands, and searches code in a loop until the work is done, using native tool-calling across OpenA…
14 views 0 likesA secure persistent personal agent server in Rust. One binary, sandboxed execution, multi-provider LLMs, voice, memory, Telegram, WhatsApp, Discord, Teams, and…
14 views 0 likesSelf-evolving agent: grows skill tree from 3.3K-line seed, achieving full system control with 6x less token consumption
14 views 0 likesDeepSeek Harness Desktop (dsh-desktop). EAC: Embracing All Creation (揽尽万象). Bundled Node.js runtime with full dsh-CLI kernel, one-click startup, 10 built-in UI…
14 views 0 likesSee your agent think. Zero-config observability & governance for 26 AI agent runtimes: Claude Code, Cursor, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Cline, Ope…
13 views 0 likesSave 94% on AI coding tokens. Index your codebase, agents search instead of reading files. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI. Local MCP…
12 views 0 likesYet another coding agent harness, lightweight and written in go.
12 views 0 likesa coding Agent from pi. ∞ providers, sub-agents, hashline edits, and a permission gate
12 views 0 likesOmnigent is an open-source AI agent framework and meta-harness: orchestrate Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Pi, and custom agents — swap harnesses without rewriting…
25 views 0 likes🧠 Leon is your open-source personal assistant.
12 views 0 likesThe Station, an open-world multi-agent environment that models a miniature scientific ecosystem.
14 views 0 likesThe Frontend Stack for Agents & Generative UI. React, Angular, Mobile, Slack, and more. Makers of the AG-UI Protocol
23 views 0 likesVelaTerm = iTerm2 + Codex, The Best Terminal for AI Coding
21 views 0 likes