LLM Mart Basic
@llm-mart · Joined Jun 2026
Use when reviewing a staged diff or an about-to-commit/push change for last-mile issues — silent failures, leaked secrets, debug leftovers, blatant correctness landmines, and excessive/narrating comments. Reports findings on the changed lines only; it does not refactor or rewrite
Use when the user wants the current change QA'd and PR-ready evidence captured. Classifies the diff and runs the verification that actually fits it — screen recordings and screenshots for UI/frontend changes, endpoint or e2e runs for backend, command output for a CLI, tests for a
Use when the user wants to restructure code while preserving behavior exactly. Establishes a passing test baseline first, then makes incremental moves that each leave the suite green. Refuses to change behavior and structure in the same step. Also known as `klaussy-refactor`.
Use when the user wants to cut a release — bump the version, update the changelog from conventional commits, and tag. Detects where the version lives, derives the next version from the commits since the last tag, and stages the release locally; it does not push or publish unless
Use when designing or analyzing a controlled experiment — falsifiable hypothesis, sample size from an MDE, reading significance/CI/power, CUPED, or rescuing tests that won't go significant. NOT recurring metric tracking (that is `analytics`), NOT north-star/KPI trees (that is `kp
Use when making a web UI conform to WCAG 2.2 Level AA — axe-core or Lighthouse a11y violations, keyboard operability, focus management, ARIA roles/names/live regions, contrast, tap-target size. NOT palette or visual intent (that is `design`), NOT test-runner setup (that is `testi
Use when running or fixing paid acquisition on Google or Meta — campaign structure (Performance Max, Demand Gen, Search, Advantage+), platform-fit creative, budget/scaling rules, break-even ROAS math, and Consent Mode v2 / CAPI tracking gaps. NOT the page the ad clicks into (that
Use when measuring whether an LLM or agent system actually got better and gating merges on it: golden sets, fixing an inflated LLM-as-judge, scoring RAG (faithfulness, contextual recall) or agent trajectories (tool correctness, completion), or picking an eval framework. NOT build
Use when bounding an LLM agent that already runs — scoping its task domain, gating tools to least privilege, defending against prompt injection in untrusted web/email/RAG text, requiring human approval on irreversible actions, capping runtime and cost, or triaging what it already
Use when a creative goal must become a finished media file: pick and order generative-media models per modality — AI voiceover, image-to-video clips, score — then glue them with ffmpeg (mux, duck, loudnorm, concat). NOT still-image generation/editing (that is `replicate-images`);
Use when instrumenting product or web analytics — GA4/PostHog SDK wiring, event taxonomy, funnels, double-counted events, consent gating, PII scrubbing. NOT charting that data (that is dashboard), NOT choosing which metrics matter (that is kpi-framework), NOT experiment math (tha
Use when constitution, spec, plan and tasks all exist and you want them cross-read against each other before any code is written — the rsc-sdd pre-implementation gate. Reports coverage gaps, contradictions, duplication, ambiguity and scope drift; edits nothing. NOT the task break
Use when building, refactoring, or debugging Angular (v20/21+): standalone components, signals, zoneless change detection, @if/@for/@defer control flow, inject() DI, resource()/httpResource(), RxJS interop, NgRx SignalStore, ng CLI. NOT React (that is react), NOT Next.js (that is
Use when writing a client for someone else's REST or GraphQL API: auth flow choice and token refresh, pagination to exhaustion, retry-with-jitter on transient failures only, rate-limit-aware throttling. NOT inbound callbacks (that is `webhooks`), NOT chaining services (that is `a
Use when settling the contract of an API you expose, before implementation: resources/URLs, REST vs GraphQL, versioning, one RFC 9457 error envelope, pagination, idempotency — emitted as OpenAPI 3.1. NOT implementing the endpoints (that is `fastapi`/`nestjs`/`go`/`nodejs`), NOT a
Use when writing one long-form article end to end — answer-first lede, question-shaped headings, plus its on-page surface (title, meta, slug, FAQ, Article/FAQPage JSON-LD) — or fixing a draft that buries the answer or reads AI-padded. NOT keyword research or topic selection (that
Use when building a content-driven or marketing site with Astro 6: static-first pages, islands and partial hydration, content collections, server islands, per-route on-demand rendering, deploy adapters, and Astro 5→6 migration. NOT app-router React with server actions and heavy c
Use when authoring a NEW rsc skill or editing an existing one — scoping it to one job, writing the description that decides whether it ever loads, splitting the body into references/, writing its evals, auditing it against the rubric. NOT building a product feature (that is `spec
Use when building or fixing a no-code automation on n8n, Make, or Zapier — trigger to multi-app steps with data mapping, dedup, retries and an error path — or picking the platform by billing unit (task vs credit vs execution). NOT a typed API client in code (that is api-connector
Use when deciding whether a process is worth automating, sizing ROI and build-vs-buy, choosing an automation platform, or diagnosing why a fleet of automations keeps breaking — the decision layer before anyone builds. NOT building the flow (that is `automation-flows`, or `n8n` /
Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes
Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds
Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.
Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.
A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.
A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.
None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.
Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.
Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen
CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.
Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it
An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server
31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions
The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.
Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.
Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.
"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks
stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.
The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.
Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.
/lookup-config
Lookup config
Search for configuration items (assets) in ConnectWise PSA
/schedule-entry
Schedule entry
Create a schedule entry/appointment in ConnectWise PSA
/search-tickets
Search tickets
Search for tickets in ConnectWise PSA by various criteria
/update-ticket
Update ticket
Update fields on an existing ConnectWise PSA ticket
/search-surveys
Search surveys
Search recent Crewhu surveys, surfacing detractors and promoters
/error-budget
Error budget
Run the reliability scorecard for one service, or every connected service if omitted - error-budget burn rate where an SLO is defined, trend reporting otherwise
/oncall-brief
Oncall brief
Generate the current on-call handoff brief - what's paging, what's escalated without an owner, last-shift history, and known-flaky alerts to watch
/postmortem
Postmortem
Draft a blameless postmortem for a given incident (by ID or name), or the most recent significant incident within a time window
/device-inventory
Device inventory
List all devices at a Domotz-monitored site
/device-lookup
Device lookup
Find a Domotz device by name, IP address, or MAC address
/site-overview
Site overview
Overview of a Domotz site's network health
/check-threat
Check threat
Pull full detail for one Checkpoint Harmony Email detection and the message behind it
/release-quarantine
Release quarantine
Restore quarantined mail to its recipients in Checkpoint Harmony Email, with task polling
/search-quarantine
Search quarantine
Find messages in Checkpoint Harmony Email by sender, subject, attachment hash or quarantine state
/search-threats
Search threats
Sweep security events in Checkpoint Harmony Email by type, state, severity and date range
/campaign-summary
Campaign summary
Get summary of recent phishing and training campaigns from KnowBe4
/group-report
Group report
Get security awareness metrics for a KnowBe4 group
/phishing-results
Phishing results
View phishing campaign results and click rates from KnowBe4
/training-status
Training status
Check training completion status for users or groups in KnowBe4
/user-risk
User risk
Get risk score and risk history for a KnowBe4 user
Your efficient agentic AI coding CLI assistant
2 views 0 likesAI coding with Aegis governance built into execution: baseline-aware changes, evidence-backed delivery. Free desktop client, your choice of model. 将哲科思维融入 AI 开发…
1 views 0 likesAndroid in docker solution with noVNC supported, video recording, mcp server and AI-agent
2 views 0 likes