LLM Mart Basic

Use when the user wants documentation written or updated — docstrings, API docs, a README section, or a doc comment on a tricky piece of code. Documents selectively: what a reader genuinely can't infer from the code, and nothing they can. Writes prose, not code changes. Also know

Use when the user wants lint, format, and type errors fixed in the current changes. Reads CLAUDE.md for the repo's lint/format/type-check commands, runs each, and fixes only style/format/type issues — no behavior changes. Also known as `klaussy-fix`.

Use when the user is tired of approving the same routine dev work ("stop asking me yes", "allow the normal dev tools", "grant permissions"). Detects the repo's stack and writes a curated allow-list into the agent's own local permission file so the basics stop prompting — reading,

Use whenever prose, a comment, a doc, a PR or commit body, or a file's text should read like a human engineer wrote it instead of an AI — "humanize this", "make it sound less like a bot", "does this read AI-written?", or before shipping prose a human will read. Rewrites in four p

Use when the user pastes a ticket, design doc, or task description and wants it implemented. Multi-phase flow — understand, investigate (in plan mode), plan, implement, verify. Enforces strict scope rules and writes failing tests first for bug fixes. Also known as `klaussy-implem

Use when the user wants a new git worktree created for a task. Picks a kebab-case branch name with a fix/feat/chore/docs/refactor prefix, runs `git worktree add` from the configured base branch, and reports the new path. Also known as `klaussy-new-worktree`.

Use when the user wants a plan for a non-trivial task in this repo. Runs discovery, parallel exploration of the codebase, clarifying questions and parallel architectures, then checks the plan against the requirements and against the repo itself (an adversarial sub-agent) before w

Use when reviewing a staged diff or an about-to-commit/push change for last-mile issues — silent failures, leaked secrets, debug leftovers, blatant correctness landmines, and excessive/narrating comments. Reports findings on the changed lines only; it does not refactor or rewrite

Use when the user wants the current change QA'd and PR-ready evidence captured. Classifies the diff and runs the verification that actually fits it — screen recordings and screenshots for UI/frontend changes, endpoint or e2e runs for backend, command output for a CLI, tests for a

Use when the user wants to restructure code while preserving behavior exactly. Establishes a passing test baseline first, then makes incremental moves that each leave the suite green. Refuses to change behavior and structure in the same step. Also known as `klaussy-refactor`.

Use when the user wants to cut a release — bump the version, update the changelog from conventional commits, and tag. Detects where the version lives, derives the next version from the commits since the last tag, and stages the release locally; it does not push or publish unless

Use when the user hands you a task definition and wants the ENTIRE development loop run end-to-end — plan, implement, review and fix, QA the change with evidence appropriate to it, open a humanized PR, then poll CI and code review, fixing and resolving until the PR is green and c

Use when the user has a stack of dependent branches or PRs that needs rebasing — the base branch moved, the bottom branch merged, or a mid-stack branch was amended. Derives the parent/child chain from git ancestry, rebases each branch onto its new parent, and force-pushes with a

Use when the user wants a thorough PR or branch review. Triages by diff size — small PRs get a single-pass review, large PRs fan out to parallel sub-agents (correctness, architecture, security, scope, and an Agentic & Evals lens that activates on AI/agent code) with a validation

Use when the user wants to run, start, or launch this project's app — to watch a change work end-to-end, reproduce behavior in the real app, or smoke-test locally. Finds the run command from CLAUDE.md and drives the app; it does not write features or fix bugs. Also known as `klau

Use when the user wants a focused security pass over the current change — scanning the branch diff for leaked secrets, injection and SSRF, broken access control, unsafe deserialization, and newly added or vulnerable dependencies. Narrower and deeper than the general review skill:

Use right before declaring an implementation done — a last-pass review of your OWN uncommitted change against a fixed checklist (reuse, stdlib, comments, dead code, tests, scope). Catches the things that make a diff read as AI-written before a human ever sees it. Reviews the curr

Use when the user explicitly wants to turn clean, human prose INTO maximal AI slop — as a joke, a demo of what AI tells look like, or to stress-test the humanize skill by feeding it the worst input imaginable. The evil twin of humanize — it adds every tell humanize strips. For la

Use when a change is too large to review in one pass and should ship as a stack of dependent PRs instead. Strips comment bloat so the size is honest, proposes layers from the import graph, then builds the branch chain, opens one request per layer targeting the layer below, and re

Use when the user wants tests written for current changes (uncommitted diff or recent feature). Matches the repo's existing test framework, fixtures, and assertion style. Covers happy path, edge cases, and error paths without over-mocking. Also known as `klaussy-test`.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Generate a formatted bibliography from the most recent research session's findings.

Interactively refine research results by searching deeper into a specific subtopic or channel. Requires an active research session from /tome:research.

Export research findings to a format compatible with memory-palace's knowledge-intake skill.

Run a multi-source research session searching GitHub, HN, Lobsters, Reddit, arXiv, and Semantic Scholar. Use for multi-channel topic surveys.

Configure Azure MCP server with Azure CLI authentication

Refresh context with CLAUDE.md instructions

Sync allowlist from GitHub repository to user settings

Sync CLAUDE.md from GitHub repository

Update README.md plugin sections and download links

Configure GCloud CLI authentication

Configure Paper Search MCP (requires Docker)

Manage Supabase Edge Functions.

Automatically generates type definitions based on your Postgres database schema.

Initialize configurations for Supabase local development.

Link your local development project to a hosted Supabase project.

Connect the Supabase CLI to your Supabase account by logging in with your [personal access token](https://supabase.com/dashboard/account/tokens).

Network bans are IPs that get temporarily blocked if their traffic pattern looks abusive (e.g. multiple failed auth attempts).

Provides tools for creating and managing your Supabase projects.

Provides tools for managing environment variables and secrets for your Supabase project.

Starts the Supabase local development stack.

Build AI Agents like playing LEGOs. Everything is a Plugin.

The coding agent that answers to you, your model, your machine, your rules.

CI-native agent CLI tool for deterministic pipeline gating.

Local-first cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code / agents: multi-agent, Git worktrees, code diffs, skill marketplace, multi-model, Computer Use, tas…

Local-first visual generation runtime and studio for people and coding agents, with reproducible image and video workflows across multiple providers.

A token-efficient MCP server for safe, line-oriented text file editing with partial reads, hash-based conflict detection, and atomic multi-file operations.

Open-source, evidence-driven MCP server for RTL simulation debugging: correlate VCS/Xcelium logs, VCD/FSDB waveforms, SystemVerilog/UVM source, hierarchy, and c…

runs anywhere. uses anything

One macOS app for Claude Code, Codex, and every agent runtime you use — scheduled runs, global hotkey launcher, per-run git worktrees, one review board.

Soul-driven AI agent with permission-hardened tools, token budgets, and multi-channel access. Runs 24/7 from CLI or Telegram.

Email, SMS & phone-call infrastructure for AI agents — send and receive real email and text messages, and place agent-driven outbound voice calls, all programma…

55 MCP tools to drive the Unity Editor from any MCP-compatible AI agent — scenes, GameObjects, prefabs, assets, tests, and builds. OpenClaw gateway included for…

Google Ads MCP + Meta Ads MCP + GA4 in one server for Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor & n8n — 250+ tools, hosted remote MCP, OAuth login, no API keys. By Ryze AI.

Claude Code & Codex 本地 token 追踪 — 状态栏（Codex 业界首创伪 statusline）、GitHub 风格热力图、多模型成本分析。 | Local token tracker for Claude Code & Codex — status line (industry-first…

Empower the Shell to think. Evolve Operations.

🤖 A full-stack Agent Chat Runtime for pre-production validation, built with act, TypeScript, and LangGraph JS combining streaming, multimodal, HITL, and tools…

Cerul — video memory infrastructure for AI products. SDKs, CLI, MCP, and developer integrations.

Stealth headless browser for AI agents — bypass Cloudflare, bot detection, and anti-scraping. Drop-in Puppeteer/Playwright replacement.

Web research for your agents with smart and safe tooling + knowledge store

FuXi is a fast, self-contained AI coding agent that lives in your terminal — edit code, run commands, and drive tools, with cost-aware routing across LLM provid…