LLM Mart Basic

Use when the user wants lint, format, and type errors fixed in the current changes. Reads CLAUDE.md for the repo's lint/format/type-check commands, runs each, and fixes only style/format/type issues — no behavior changes. Also known as `klaussy-fix`.

Use when the user is tired of approving the same routine dev work ("stop asking me yes", "allow the normal dev tools", "grant permissions"). Detects the repo's stack and writes a curated allow-list into the agent's own local permission file so the basics stop prompting — reading,

Use whenever prose, a comment, a doc, a PR or commit body, or a file's text should read like a human engineer wrote it instead of an AI — "humanize this", "make it sound less like a bot", "does this read AI-written?", or before shipping prose a human will read. Rewrites in four p

Use when the user pastes a ticket, design doc, or task description and wants it implemented. Multi-phase flow — understand, investigate (in plan mode), plan, implement, verify. Enforces strict scope rules and writes failing tests first for bug fixes. Also known as `klaussy-implem

Use when the user wants a new git worktree created for a task. Picks a kebab-case branch name with a fix/feat/chore/docs/refactor prefix, runs `git worktree add` from the configured base branch, and reports the new path. Also known as `klaussy-new-worktree`.

Use when the user wants a plan for a non-trivial task in this repo. Runs discovery, parallel exploration of the codebase, clarifying questions and parallel architectures, then checks the plan against the requirements and against the repo itself (an adversarial sub-agent) before w

Use when reviewing a staged diff or an about-to-commit/push change for last-mile issues — silent failures, leaked secrets, debug leftovers, blatant correctness landmines, and excessive/narrating comments. Reports findings on the changed lines only; it does not refactor or rewrite

Use when the user wants the current change QA'd and PR-ready evidence captured. Classifies the diff and runs the verification that actually fits it — screen recordings and screenshots for UI/frontend changes, endpoint or e2e runs for backend, command output for a CLI, tests for a

Use when the user wants to restructure code while preserving behavior exactly. Establishes a passing test baseline first, then makes incremental moves that each leave the suite green. Refuses to change behavior and structure in the same step. Also known as `klaussy-refactor`.

Use when the user wants to cut a release — bump the version, update the changelog from conventional commits, and tag. Detects where the version lives, derives the next version from the commits since the last tag, and stages the release locally; it does not push or publish unless

Use when the user hands you a task definition and wants the ENTIRE development loop run end-to-end — plan, implement, review and fix, QA the change with evidence appropriate to it, open a humanized PR, then poll CI and code review, fixing and resolving until the PR is green and c

Use when the user has a stack of dependent branches or PRs that needs rebasing — the base branch moved, the bottom branch merged, or a mid-stack branch was amended. Derives the parent/child chain from git ancestry, rebases each branch onto its new parent, and force-pushes with a

Use when the user wants a thorough PR or branch review. Triages by diff size — small PRs get a single-pass review, large PRs fan out to parallel sub-agents (correctness, architecture, security, scope, and an Agentic & Evals lens that activates on AI/agent code) with a validation

Use when the user wants to run, start, or launch this project's app — to watch a change work end-to-end, reproduce behavior in the real app, or smoke-test locally. Finds the run command from CLAUDE.md and drives the app; it does not write features or fix bugs. Also known as `klau

Use when the user wants a focused security pass over the current change — scanning the branch diff for leaked secrets, injection and SSRF, broken access control, unsafe deserialization, and newly added or vulnerable dependencies. Narrower and deeper than the general review skill:

Use right before declaring an implementation done — a last-pass review of your OWN uncommitted change against a fixed checklist (reuse, stdlib, comments, dead code, tests, scope). Catches the things that make a diff read as AI-written before a human ever sees it. Reviews the curr

Use when the user explicitly wants to turn clean, human prose INTO maximal AI slop — as a joke, a demo of what AI tells look like, or to stress-test the humanize skill by feeding it the worst input imaginable. The evil twin of humanize — it adds every tell humanize strips. For la

Use when a change is too large to review in one pass and should ship as a stack of dependent PRs instead. Strips comment bloat so the size is honest, proposes layers from the import graph, then builds the branch chain, opens one request per layer targeting the layer below, and re

Use when the user wants tests written for current changes (uncommitted diff or recent feature). Matches the repo's existing test framework, fixtures, and assertion style. Covers happy path, edge cases, and error paths without over-mocking. Also known as `klaussy-test`.

Use when the user wants stale or unused git worktrees cleaned up. Classifies every worktree as merged, abandoned, dirty, or in use, proposes which to remove, and on confirmation removes them with `git worktree remove` and prunes the leftovers. Never forces a removal and never tou

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

This is the lane for changes with no behavior to test-drive — prose edits, a version bump on an

Use this after a pull request has merged but your local checkout is still on the topic branch.

Prints the public command catalog straight from `COMMANDS.md` — the plugin's own single source

This is the single entry point for turning staged work into a commit — nothing in codeArbiter

The protocol for a rule conflict — not a skill route, an orchestrator-level halt. When two sources

An optional, on-demand drift audit for the bypass case: a merge, a direct push, or a manual edit

This is the populator for a project that already has code to read. Instead of interviewing you about

This is where an unexplained defect goes before anyone touches code. The investigation is

This is the populator for a project that has no code yet to read. Rather than guessing at

Proves the install is actually enforcing, rather than just present. codeArbiter's worst failure

This is the standard entry point for new work with a human in the loop at every step. A short

This is the entry point for a defect that already has a known cause, or one you can describe

This is how a repository opts into codeArbiter for the first time. It writes the root-level state

A bare-numbers governance glance — three metrics, each with a trend arrow against the prior

The sanctioned, logged escape hatch. A routine gate — a lint rule, a style check, a non-security

Explicit PR entry and a direct request to open a PR use the same branch-finishing owner.

A zero-onboarding, read-only dry-run of the reviewer fleet against whatever is currently

This is a Feature Forge preview command — the after-each-turn service ships **off** by default and

Compares architectural records with the scaffold and prior decisions using SMARTS.

This is the lane for moving or reshaping code without changing what it does — a rename, an extract,

Open-source MCP servers for Latin American commerce — Pix, NF-e, banking, fiscal, logistics, and messaging across Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Colombia, Chile, an…

pi coding agent in a technicolor web trenchcoat

Open-source AI Search Intelligence Platform — track, analyze, and improve AI visibility, citations, prompts, competitors, and content opportunities across ChatG…

Open-source toolkit for the QVeris capability routing network: CLI, MCP server, Python SDK, skills, and REST API docs for agents to discover, inspect, call, and…

⚡ The Complete X/Twitter Automation Toolkit — Scrapers, MCP server for AI agents (Claude/GPT), CLI, browser scripts. No API fees. Open source. Unfollow people w…

The AI agent that interacts with you in the real world.

Offline Codex Desktop migration for Windows and macOS.

LLM 驱动的多市场股票智能分析系统：多源行情、实时新闻、决策看板与自动推送，支持零成本定时运行。 LLM-powered multi-market stock analysis system with multi-source market data, real-time news, decision dashbo…

Your smart, reliable, and friendly personal AI assistant.

The LLM Anti-Framework

A general-purpose AIGC video engine: script to finished film in one pipeline — dramas, ads, product videos, otome games, and more. | 通用 AIGC 视频引擎 —— 从剧本到成片一条流水线…

GTM agent for technical founders. Pay-per-result. Signed receipts. Two surfaces: terminal CLI + local web dashboard.

Desktop automation MCP server — computer use for any AI agent: control screen, windows, mouse/keyboard, and Chrome via Model Context Protocol (stdio)

DeepSeek Harness (dsh) Windows desktop client - bundled Node.js + dsh CLI, one-click launch

Open-source, real-time collaborative AI canvas - notes, mini-apps, and agents on one infinite board.

MCPSafari: Native Safari MCP Server for AI Agents

197 bioinformatics & life science skills for Claude Code and AI agents — BixBench 92.0% accuracy. RNA-seq, single-cell, drug discovery, proteomics, and more. Po…

The AI agent with a wallet — spends USDC autonomously to get real work done. Apache-2.0, TypeScript.

The fastest browser for AI agents to run browser automation, built for sharing your logged-in browser state with your AI agents, like Codex or Claude Code, with…

Ouroboros — self-creating AI agent. Born Feb 16, 2026.