LLM Mart Basic

Use when working with C++20 co_await, co_yield, and co_return, implementing promise_type, sizing coroutine frames, or debugging suspended coroutines in GDB. Not for Rust async: use idiomatic-rust.

Use when a C++ project adopts C++20 modules: named modules, partitions, header units, the global module fragment, CMake CXX_MODULES, or a BMI lookup error. Not for flag basics: use clang.

Use when a C++ template error needs decoding, a template needs a concept or requires-clause instead of SFINAE, or template instantiation is slowing compilation. Not for C++20 modules: use cpp-modules.

Use when diagnosing cache misses with perf, fixing false sharing, choosing AoS or SoA layout, or adding software prefetch. Not for cache theory: use memory-hierarchy-and-caches.

Use when writing, optimizing, or benchmarking a C++ CPU kernel with AVX2 or AVX512 intrinsics for the Hugging Face kernels ecosystem. Not for CUDA kernels: use cuda.

Use when explaining pipeline stages, data or control hazards, forwarding, stalls, or superscalar basics behind a counter reading. Not for mispredict cost: use branch-prediction-and-speculation.

Use when the user asks to create a new branch or start work on one. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when asked to create a multi-session learning plan. Returns a milestoned plan, practice, and review rubric. Don't use for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

Use when asked to create a local agent-plugin directory tree or marketplace package. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when asked to create or update a PR, revise its description, or link issue references to its body. Not for multi-PR stacks: use gate-and-merge. Not for releases: use git-workflow-and-versioning.

Use when independent proposals on a contested decision need cross-critique before choosing, reusing the original authors. Not for parallel multi-stance investigation: use council.

Use when compiling for ARM, AArch64, RISC-V, or MIPS from x86-64 with a GCC cross toolchain: triplets, sysroots, pkg-config, CMake toolchain files, QEMU. Not for Zig: use zig-cross.

Use when one reviewer is not enough because failure modes are heterogeneous, or a claim needs cross-lens pressure before it ships. Not for collapsing a decision field: use converge.

Use when a long agentic project needs each cycle to end in a learning memo and a keep/iterate/restart decision. Not for single-pass builds.

Use when asked for a sequence diagram of cryptographic protocol semantics from code, prose, RFCs, papers, ProVerif, or Tamarin, or for code/spec divergence. Not for architecture: use diagramming-code.

Use when writing CUDA kernels, managing the thread, block, and grid hierarchy, tiling shared memory, using streams, setting nvcc flags, or using Thrust. Not for kernel debugging: use cuda-debugging.

Use when debugging CUDA with cuda-gdb or Compute Sanitizer, reading GPU core dumps, using device printf, or triaging error codes 700, 701, 702, and 719. Not for performance: use cuda-profiling.

Use when profiling CUDA with Nsight Systems or Nsight Compute, reading roofline and occupancy metrics, or annotating phases with NVTX. Not for correctness: use cuda-debugging.

Use when Survey and Job Culture Index profiles need analysis for stress, burnout, disengagement, or flight-risk signals. Not for clinical diagnosis: use a qualified clinician.

Use when two colleagues' working friction needs trait-based explanation, accommodations, process changes, and escalation boundaries, or for manager-report friction. Not for performance adjudication.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Setup automated synchronization workflows

Resolve synchronization conflicts automatically

Sync GitHub issues to Linear workspace

Sync Linear tasks to GitHub issues

Link pull requests to Linear tasks

Monitor GitHub-Linear sync health status

Synchronize task status with git commits, ensuring consistency between version control and task tracking.

Simulate system performance under various loads with capacity planning, bottleneck identification, and optimization strategies.

Create Linear tasks from pull requests

Test-driven development workflow with Red-Green-Refactor process and branch management

Balance team workload distribution

Automate changelog testing workflow

Analyze and report test coverage

I need you to create an integration testing plan for $ARGUMENTS

Accelerate scenario testing with rapid iteration cycles, confidence intervals, and compressed decision timelines.

Manage project todos in a todos.md file with add, complete, remove, and list operations

Generate troubleshooting documentation

Deep analysis and problem solving mode

Sets up a professional Unity project with industry-standard structure and configurations

Update current git branch name based on analysis of changes made

Open-source, self-hosted AI media server. One server replaces your entire media stack, with a web app, native iPhone app, and an AI agent that gets things done.…

A curated list of tools built for Jev — TypeSafe AI's System One model for typed decisions.

🦦 Crayotter: A Multimodal AI-Agent for Video-Editing, Video-Composing, and Video Production. Powered by Multimodal LLMs for autonomous Text-to-Video agentic fr…

Webextension tool for Odoo