LLM Mart Basic

Use when "CI is red", "fix the checks", or "make CI green", one check needs classifying, or a bounded sweep runs. Not for deploys, credentials, or rerun-as-fix. Non-CI bugs: use strike-the-root.

Use when a C or C++ build uses clang and needs diagnostics, optimization remarks, clang-tidy, ThinLTO with lld, LLVM PGO, or a GCC-to-Clang migration. Not for LLVM IR work: use llvm.

Use when setting up a project, auditing agent command permissions, or asking which read-only bash commands and domains to allow. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when the user just edited a durable artifact, or says "clean and true", "run the hygiene pass", or "taste the output". Routes the artifact through the hygiene passes it earned.

Use when asked to run /clean-clean-cut to cut accumulated records and residue. Not for untracked or non-VCS changes, or branch/worktree cleanup: use git-cleanup.

Use when asked to build or review a CLI intended for coding agents and return flag-driven, pipeline-safe, idempotent design advice. Not for running or profiling a CLI: use control-cli.

Use when the user wants to batch-close resolved or outdated tracker items. The agent never closes tracker items itself. Not for individual closure or items still under active work.

Use when a human explicitly runs /cloud-task-orchestrator for a large task across cloud agents to drain a verified task graph. Not for local subagent coordination: use orchestration-patterns.

Use when writing CMakeLists.txt, out-of-source builds, target_link_libraries, target properties, find_package/FetchContent, toolchain files, CPack, CMake presets, or cmake configure errors.

Use when reading llc output, tracing IR through legalization and instruction selection, or scoping a new LLVM target. Not for IR-level passes: use llvm-ir-and-passes.

Use when the user asks to simplify, clean, or refine code. Not for new abstractions or whole-codebase refactors.

Use when building or reusing a CodeQL database, running CodeQL security analysis, or modeling project-specific sources and sinks. Not for manual vulnerability review: use security-review (mode: confirmed).

Use when asked to commit changes, create a typed branch, format history for a changelog, or rewrite messages of HEAD or an unpushed range. Not for pushing or a PR: use commit-push-pr.

Use when a human asks to commit and push, not publish, the checked-out branch, including directly to the default branch, with no branch creation and no pull request. Not for a feature branch off the default: use commit-push-pr in its no-PR mode.

Use when asked to commit and push a feature branch, with or without a pull request. Its no-PR mode publishes without a PR. Not for a PR body alone: use create-pull-request.

Use when asked to research a feature across competitor products or to analyze competitor release changelogs (mode: changelog), and publish a cited report.

Use when the user asks for direction and a compilable 3D workflow from an interview. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when building a lexer, Pratt or recursive-descent parser, AST, symbol table, type checker, or LLVM IR emitter for a language or DSL. Not for optimizing IR: use llvm-passes.

Use when -O3 leaves a hot loop scalar, spills appear in assembly, or a PGO or BOLT deployment is planned or stalls. Not for machine lowering: use code-generation-and-backends.

Use when a user wants to identify the true sources of complexity qualitatively before counting metrics. Not for source or remote mutation.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Analyze Python async code for correctness, patterns, and potential issues.

Profile Python code for performance bottlenecks using cProfile, memory_profiler, or py-spy.

Evaluate public API surfaces against guidelines and exemplars.

Principal-level architecture assessment against ADRs and design patterns.

Systematic bug detection with language-specific expertise.

Run a detailed review that picks its dimensions from what the codebase and diff contain.

Active security hardening of the existing codebase, with a report and concrete proposals to apply.

Audit Makefiles for best practices and portability.

Intensive mathematical analysis for numerical stability and correctness.

Static-analysis hot-spot review for time and space complexity.

Analyze code quality across 6 dimensions (duplication, algorithms, clean code, architecture, errors, style) and apply fixes.

Expert-level Rust audits for safety and correctness.

Audit shell scripts for correctness, safety, and portability.

View recent skill executions with full context and error details.

Analyze skill execution metrics and identify unstable or underperforming skills.

Evaluate and upgrade test suites with TDD/BDD rigor.

Run a computer use task on the desktop via Claude's vision and action API

Stage changes, generate conventional commit message, commit, and push to current branch. One-shot git add-commit-push.

Draft a Conventional Commit message for staged changes. Analyzes diffs, classifies change type, and formats scope/body.

Create git release tags from merged PRs or version args. Pushes a v-prefixed tag to trigger the release pipeline, then confirms the run started.

AI skill for OpenClaw & Claude Code — recommend from 10000+ Nano Banana Pro (Gemini) image prompts. Smart search by use case, content remix, sample images.

嘉立创EDA专业版(EasyEDA Pro)自动化：给 AI harness 装上画板的「手」—— 一套 typed 原理图/PCB 动作，CLI / Agent Skill / stdio MCP 三形态融合接入。承接嘉立创「不以卖板赚钱，以培养中国工程师为己任」 | EasyEDA Pro automation:…

Claude Code session log viewer for JSONL files in ~/.claude/projects. Browse conversations, tool calls, tokens, and live tail sessions on desktop, web, and TUI.

Shared memory MCP server — persistent, searchable, cross-client Claude, Opencode

OpenAI Codex CLI session log viewer for JSONL files in ~/.codex/sessions. Browse conversations, tool calls, tokens, collaboration chains, and live sessions on d…

High-performance Google Drive CLI and Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server for LLM/AI agents. Natively execute Google Apps Script (GAS) under a secure whiteliste…

"Vibe-Trading: Your Personal Trading Agent"

Local-first chat history analyzer with AI. | 本地优先的 AI 聊天记录分析工具

Official Oxylabs MCP integration

Persistent memory for Claude Code & Codex CLI. Auto-extracted knowledge graph, multi-representation embeddings, 3D WebGL visualization. LongMemEval R@5=97.45%.…

One person, a team of agents. Multi-session CLI that collaborates across terminals; /goal keeps long tasks running; WeChat/WeCom/Feishu gateway lets you call th…

AI 基础知识 - GPU 架构、CUDA 编程、大模型基础及AI Agent 相关知识。

Self-hosted, open-source agent skill registry for enterprises. Publish & version skill packages, govern with RBAC and audit logs, deploy on-premise with Docke…

深度调研报告生成 Skill — 一条命令，十分钟出券商级深度调研报告 / Professional deep research report generation Skill · Supports 19 languages

The OKF toolkit for Claude Code — author, maintain, validate & visualize Open Knowledge Format bundles. Plugin, agent skills, and a GitHub Action.

Autonomous AI pentesting agents — real-time reconnaissance, vulnerability detection, and exploitation orchestration. Go + TypeScript.

Native macOS and iOS App for the Hermes AI agent — multi-window, multi-server (local + remote over SSH). Chat, dashboard, sessions, memory, cron, MCP, and more.

Multiplayer Claude Code and Codex. Self-hosted team workspace for Claude Code and Codex. Multi-user, browser-based, AI mates with memory.

Every past session, subagent, and workflow -- queryable by your agent, browsable by you

盯盘侠 PanWatch · 自托管 AI 盯盘助手，集成 TradingAgents 多 Agent 投资决策 | A股/港股/美股实时监控、持仓管理、智能分析、全渠道推送