LLM Mart Basic

Flutter Riverpod app architecture and Windows installer delivery. Use before changing a Riverpod Flutter app/package or its Windows desktop packaging/update pipeline; skip non-Riverpod stacks and pure-Dart work.

Review PR, branch, commit or working-tree changes for concrete defects and fidelity to intended behavior. Also use when explicitly asked to independently challenge a prepared plan, diagnosis or verification claim.

Design or review module ownership, public interfaces and abstractions; UI token/component ownership; or domain-driven models, bounded contexts and invariants. Use for structural decisions, not routine edits within an established owner.

Prove real user journeys across browser, mobile, desktop, API and CLI surfaces using the project's existing test tools. Use for end-to-end verification, runtime UI review or requested visual proof.

Apply Hard Eng's planning, project context, verification and gate-adaptation guidance when implementing or reviewing code in an installed project.

Implement and verify a ready, authorized plan through focused fixes and integrated checks, ending with a ready-for-ship handoff. Use for implementation, bug fixes or resuming build work; skip planning-only, review-only and shipping-only requests.

Prevent verified repeated failures and preserve lasting decisions in terse ADRs. Use when failures recur, prevention needs strengthening, or accepted decisions and steering need durable capture; skip ordinary one-off fixes and routine task updates.

Plan a change before implementation, resolve material user decisions and prepare repository-grounded UX references. Use a compact plan for small changes; route large, unclear efforts or explicit Wayfinder requests to Wayfinder. Skip explanation-only requests and execution already

Deliver a verified build through a task branch and PR, check the intended remote result, and clean up the completed task safely. Use for PR creation, shipping, merging or release/deployment requests; skip planning, implementation and review-only work.

Make a voiced product marketing or explainer video from real product screens. Script, cut walkthrough clips or stage app screenshots with a cursor, pick voice takes, render branded motion graphics and diagrams, mix music and review every second before delivery.

Investigate a codebase, compare tools or approaches, verify current external or library facts, and research failures before making a substantive technical recommendation. Use for sufficiency and gap reviews; ordinary edits with settled requirements do not need a research stage.

Review authorized application code, configuration, designs or artifacts for concrete authorization, data exposure, injection, secret, dependency and LLM/tool security risks. Use for a requested security review or a change affecting a trust boundary.

Write, revise or review an agent skill (SKILL.md package).

Use when explaining System V AMD64, ARM AAPCS, RISC-V psABI, stack frames, variadic calls, or FFI register rules. Not for the Rust FFI binding layer: use rust-ffi.

Use when the user wants to classify abstractions as useful, bad, or busy and keep one shallow level. Not for tasks requiring source or remote-system changes.

Use when configuring ADC sampling time, DMA-driven ADC, calibration, or DAC channel setup on bare-metal MCUs. Not for the DMA stream itself: use dma-baremetal.

Use when creating AF_XDP sockets, configuring UMEM and XSK rings, writing an XDP redirect program, or choosing copy versus zero-copy mode. Not for full kernel bypass: use dpdk.

Use when a completed session needs an agent-environment retrospective. Not for an engineering retrospective from telemetry: use engineering-retrospective.

Use when asked to audit or repair agent surfaces (plugins, agents, skills, CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md, docs, prompts, commands, hooks) or improve one skill at depth. Not for agent grading: use skill-doctor.

Use when a redacted, trimmed agent transcript must be appended to a GitHub PR or issue body, with human approval and preview. Not for automated or model-initiated insertion.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

`crabbox inspect` prints the full record for a single lease: state, provider,

Run named, repo-local jobs defined in your Crabbox config.

`crabbox list` shows the current Crabbox machines (leases) for a provider. It is

`crabbox login` authenticates the CLI against a coordinator, stores the

`crabbox logout` clears the stored broker token from your user config so the CLI

`crabbox logs` prints the retained command output for a recorded run.

`crabbox marketplace` previews the Crabbox credits gateway: one Crabbox billing

`crabbox media` turns a recorded desktop video into lightweight review

`crabbox open` prepares an existing SSH-capable lease for an external editor.

`crabbox pause` pauses a single lease, freeing the remote compute while

`crabbox pond` is the cross-provider peer-discovery and lifecycle surface for a

`crabbox pool` contains machine-pool helpers. `pool list` keeps the older

`crabbox ports` bridges provider-native port publishing for an existing Crabbox

`crabbox prewarm` leases a reusable box and prepares it for test runs. For

`crabbox providers` prints the provider capability matrix that the CLI compiles

`crabbox receipt <run-id>` retrieves a brokered run's committed terminal

`crabbox results` prints the structured test summary attached to a recorded

`crabbox resume` resumes a lease previously paused with [`pause`](pause.md),

`crabbox run` syncs the current dirty checkout to a box, runs a command there,

`crabbox screenshot` captures a single PNG from a desktop lease without opening a

AI assistant in Telegram that remembers everything and helps you run your life. Self-hosted in one command.

知更 — 本地 AI 的上下文与记忆层。Mac 上用语音输入、情境代回并调度 Codex / Claude Code；iOS 正在成为随身记忆终端和本地 Agent 遥控器。Local-first · BYOK.

Agent skill that turns Claude Code / Codex into a motion-design studio for voiceover-driven explainer videos — word-level voiceover sync, 78 motion recipe cards…

CoCo Super Intelligence is the orchestration layer that turns Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex into an engineering department: a routed advisory board, 185 skills,…

Deploy AI agent teams at scale without compromise

大师.skill — 输入行业，自动调研 6 轨[行业大佬 / 工具地图 / 工作流 / 知识正典 / 信息源 / 术语标准] → 提炼为可运行的行业 Master OS skill；装到任意 Claude Code / OpenClaw / Codex / Hermes agent 即让其进入「这一行的资深人」模式。…

Notion MCP server for Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT & Claude Desktop. Connect AI agents to Notion via Model Context Protocol — pages, databases, blocks, comments, fil…

Hook-based token compressor for 5 AI CLI hosts (Claude Code, Copilot CLI, OpenCode, Gemini CLI, Codex CLI). Up to 95% bash compression, signature-mode for code…

Model-neutral agent desktop/runtime for private, enterprise, and OpenAI-compatible / Anthropic-compatible model API. Tested on DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, GLM models.…

AI agent skill for end-to-end hotel search and booking—compare live rates across leading OTAs and hotel suppliers, verify availability, book stays, and manage r…

More than just Karpathy’s LLM Wiki, 100% local with Ollama. Drop Markdown notes → AI extracts concepts → your Obsidian wiki auto-links and grows. Zero sharing.…

Claude Code Guide - Setup, Commands, workflows, agents, skills & tips-n-tricks from beginner to power user!

A magical tool that changes how you use Agents. Install once — every Agent automatically discovers and uses all your MCP tools, and saves your tokens along the…

Open-source 24/7 Cowork app for OpenClaw, Hermes, Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode and 20+ more CLI Agent | Customize your assistants | Team them up｜Star if you lik…

AgenticX is a unified, production-ready multi-agent platform — Python SDK + CLI (agx) + Studio server + Machi desktop app. Features Meta-Agent orchestration, 15…

Query, provision and operate Cloud, SaaS, API and Model Context Protocol (MCP) resources through a unified SQL-based framework for humans and AI agents.

Open-source AI job search: scan job portals, evaluate listings into a structured A-H report with a global 1-5 score, tailor your CV, track applications — runs l…

A self-healing scraper for hostile sites: broken selectors repair themselves, browser rendering kicks in when needed, and a coherent identity layer (Chrome TLS…

Lightweight AI-native workflow builder for individuals and small teams — describe your idea in natural language, get a runnable workflow on a visual canvas, pub…

Minimal AI coding agent (~1,000 lines of Python) inspired by Claude Code. Works with any LLM. Think NanoGPT for coding agents. Formerly NanoCoder.