LLM Mart Basic

Flutter Riverpod app architecture and Windows installer delivery. Use before changing a Riverpod Flutter app/package or its Windows desktop packaging/update pipeline; skip non-Riverpod stacks and pure-Dart work.

Review PR, branch, commit or working-tree changes for concrete defects and fidelity to intended behavior. Also use when explicitly asked to independently challenge a prepared plan, diagnosis or verification claim.

Design or review module ownership, public interfaces and abstractions; UI token/component ownership; or domain-driven models, bounded contexts and invariants. Use for structural decisions, not routine edits within an established owner.

Prove real user journeys across browser, mobile, desktop, API and CLI surfaces using the project's existing test tools. Use for end-to-end verification, runtime UI review or requested visual proof.

Apply Hard Eng's planning, project context, verification and gate-adaptation guidance when implementing or reviewing code in an installed project.

Implement and verify a ready, authorized plan through focused fixes and integrated checks, ending with a ready-for-ship handoff. Use for implementation, bug fixes or resuming build work; skip planning-only, review-only and shipping-only requests.

Prevent verified repeated failures and preserve lasting decisions in terse ADRs. Use when failures recur, prevention needs strengthening, or accepted decisions and steering need durable capture; skip ordinary one-off fixes and routine task updates.

Plan a change before implementation, resolve material user decisions and prepare repository-grounded UX references. Use a compact plan for small changes; route large, unclear efforts or explicit Wayfinder requests to Wayfinder. Skip explanation-only requests and execution already

Deliver a verified build through a task branch and PR, check the intended remote result, and clean up the completed task safely. Use for PR creation, shipping, merging or release/deployment requests; skip planning, implementation and review-only work.

Make a voiced product marketing or explainer video from real product screens. Script, cut walkthrough clips or stage app screenshots with a cursor, pick voice takes, render branded motion graphics and diagrams, mix music and review every second before delivery.

Investigate a codebase, compare tools or approaches, verify current external or library facts, and research failures before making a substantive technical recommendation. Use for sufficiency and gap reviews; ordinary edits with settled requirements do not need a research stage.

Review authorized application code, configuration, designs or artifacts for concrete authorization, data exposure, injection, secret, dependency and LLM/tool security risks. Use for a requested security review or a change affecting a trust boundary.

Write, revise or review an agent skill (SKILL.md package).

Use when explaining System V AMD64, ARM AAPCS, RISC-V psABI, stack frames, variadic calls, or FFI register rules. Not for the Rust FFI binding layer: use rust-ffi.

Use when the user wants to classify abstractions as useful, bad, or busy and keep one shallow level. Not for tasks requiring source or remote-system changes.

Use when configuring ADC sampling time, DMA-driven ADC, calibration, or DAC channel setup on bare-metal MCUs. Not for the DMA stream itself: use dma-baremetal.

Use when creating AF_XDP sockets, configuring UMEM and XSK rings, writing an XDP redirect program, or choosing copy versus zero-copy mode. Not for full kernel bypass: use dpdk.

Use when a completed session needs an agent-environment retrospective. Not for an engineering retrospective from telemetry: use engineering-retrospective.

Use when asked to audit or repair agent surfaces (plugins, agents, skills, CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md, docs, prompts, commands, hooks) or improve one skill at depth. Not for agent grading: use skill-doctor.

Use when a redacted, trimmed agent transcript must be appended to a GitHub PR or issue body, with human approval and preview. Not for automated or model-initiated insertion.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Create a multi-agent group chat with AG2 using configurable speaker selection patterns

Scaffold an A2A-compliant AG2 agent with server wiring, card settings, and skill definitions

Scaffold a new AG2 ConversableAgent with tool functions, system prompt, and LLM config

Create a tool function for an AG2 agent with type annotations, docstrings, and JSON return contracts

Create a sequential multi-agent pipeline where each agent processes and passes results to the next

Design a complete multi-agent workflow from a natural language description, selecting the right orchestration pattern

Follow RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle approach for test-driven development

Implement secure user authentication system

Generate and maintain project changelog

Setup mutation testing for code quality

Add and configure new project dependencies

Setup application performance monitoring

Implement property-based testing framework

Add a new entry to the project's CHANGELOG.md file following Keep a Changelog format

Preflight a repo before AI agents change files

Display all available development tools

Review and improve system architecture

Explore architectural decisions through systematic scenario analysis with trade-off evaluation and future-proofing assessment.

Enable bidirectional GitHub-Linear synchronization

Interview to flesh out a plan/spec

Atom Agent, Open-Source Governed AI Agent Platform for Self-Hosted Automation

The agent engineering intelligence harness, optimized tools, memory system, subagents and mixture of models packages ⚚

Sesori iOS/Android app and the Sesori Bridge CLI — drive Claude, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, Pi, OMP, Hermes coding sessions from your phone

🧠 RepoBrain (formerly Antigravity) — Give your repo a brain. ChatGPT for your codebase: works in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Windsurf & more.

Use ChatGPT (Codex), Claude, and Grok (X Premium) subscriptions as DeepSeek Harness LLM providers — OAuth login in the web UI, no API keys

Latitude is the open-source AI monitoring platform.

Open-source AI browser agent for Chrome and Firefox (monorepo) 🧠

Official Model Studio CLI（阿里云百炼 CLI）built for AI Agent frameworks, exposing models, search, multimodal, and workflow capabilities as structured tool calls.

Curated DeepSeek Harness (DSH) plugins, extensions, tools, skills, clients, runtimes, integrations, and verified references — English and Chinese.

Turn papers, code, and docs into presentation-ready, natively editable PPTX in Codex / Claude Code. Native charts and equations, speaker notes, click-build anim…

Grix : Work with agents like talking to people.

Local First Ai Agent. Optimized for Local Ai models. Long context window. Proper tools callings. Runs privately on your device.

Model Context Protocol server that integrates AgentQL's data extraction capabilities.

AI that ships your tickets.

Metadata-driven CLI for AI Agent Bots — 48 operations across 7 domains, structured JSON envelope I/O, zero interactive prompts.

An open-source, extensible, self-hosted agent workspace with multi-runtime support for Codex, Claude Code, and more, plus reusable local apps for custom interfa…

Open-source Windows desktop client and GUI for DeepSeek Harness — zero-setup installer with Codex, plugins, skills, SSH, mobile remote access, and 11 skins.

The open-source AI workbench for scientific research

DeepSeek-native AI coding agent for your terminal. Engineered around prefix-cache stability — leave it running.

A Fully free agentic browser driver for AI , few tools, full control, real stealth, top-tier token efficiency.