LLM Mart Basic
@llm-mart · Joined Jun 2026
Flutter Riverpod app architecture and Windows installer delivery. Use before changing a Riverpod Flutter app/package or its Windows desktop packaging/update pipeline; skip non-Riverpod stacks and pure-Dart work.
Review PR, branch, commit or working-tree changes for concrete defects and fidelity to intended behavior. Also use when explicitly asked to independently challenge a prepared plan, diagnosis or verification claim.
Design or review module ownership, public interfaces and abstractions; UI token/component ownership; or domain-driven models, bounded contexts and invariants. Use for structural decisions, not routine edits within an established owner.
Prove real user journeys across browser, mobile, desktop, API and CLI surfaces using the project's existing test tools. Use for end-to-end verification, runtime UI review or requested visual proof.
Apply Hard Eng's planning, project context, verification and gate-adaptation guidance when implementing or reviewing code in an installed project.
Implement and verify a ready, authorized plan through focused fixes and integrated checks, ending with a ready-for-ship handoff. Use for implementation, bug fixes or resuming build work; skip planning-only, review-only and shipping-only requests.
Prevent verified repeated failures and preserve lasting decisions in terse ADRs. Use when failures recur, prevention needs strengthening, or accepted decisions and steering need durable capture; skip ordinary one-off fixes and routine task updates.
Plan a change before implementation, resolve material user decisions and prepare repository-grounded UX references. Use a compact plan for small changes; route large, unclear efforts or explicit Wayfinder requests to Wayfinder. Skip explanation-only requests and execution already
Deliver a verified build through a task branch and PR, check the intended remote result, and clean up the completed task safely. Use for PR creation, shipping, merging or release/deployment requests; skip planning, implementation and review-only work.
Make a voiced product marketing or explainer video from real product screens. Script, cut walkthrough clips or stage app screenshots with a cursor, pick voice takes, render branded motion graphics and diagrams, mix music and review every second before delivery.
Investigate a codebase, compare tools or approaches, verify current external or library facts, and research failures before making a substantive technical recommendation. Use for sufficiency and gap reviews; ordinary edits with settled requirements do not need a research stage.
Review authorized application code, configuration, designs or artifacts for concrete authorization, data exposure, injection, secret, dependency and LLM/tool security risks. Use for a requested security review or a change affecting a trust boundary.
Write, revise or review an agent skill (SKILL.md package).
Use when explaining System V AMD64, ARM AAPCS, RISC-V psABI, stack frames, variadic calls, or FFI register rules. Not for the Rust FFI binding layer: use rust-ffi.
Use when the user wants to classify abstractions as useful, bad, or busy and keep one shallow level. Not for tasks requiring source or remote-system changes.
Use when configuring ADC sampling time, DMA-driven ADC, calibration, or DAC channel setup on bare-metal MCUs. Not for the DMA stream itself: use dma-baremetal.
Use when creating AF_XDP sockets, configuring UMEM and XSK rings, writing an XDP redirect program, or choosing copy versus zero-copy mode. Not for full kernel bypass: use dpdk.
Use when a completed session needs an agent-environment retrospective. Not for an engineering retrospective from telemetry: use engineering-retrospective.
Use when asked to audit or repair agent surfaces (plugins, agents, skills, CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md, docs, prompts, commands, hooks) or improve one skill at depth. Not for agent grading: use skill-doctor.
Use when a redacted, trimmed agent transcript must be appended to a GitHub PR or issue body, with human approval and preview. Not for automated or model-initiated insertion.
Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes
Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds
Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.
Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.
A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.
A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.
None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.
Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.
Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen
CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.
Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it
An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server
31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions
The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.
Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.
Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.
"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks
stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.
The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.
Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.
/improve-agent
Improve agent
Improve an existing agent through performance baselines, prompt engineering, A/B testing, and staged rollout
/multi-agent-optimize
Multi agent optimize
Optimize multi-agent system performance through profiling, context window tuning, coordination efficiency, and cost and latency tradeoffs
/team-debug
Team debug
Debug issues using competing hypotheses with parallel investigation by multiple agents
/team-delegate
Team delegate
Task delegation dashboard for managing team workload, assignments, and rebalancing
/team-feature
Team feature
Develop features in parallel with multiple agents using file ownership boundaries and dependency management
/team-review
Team review
Launch a multi-reviewer parallel code review with specialized review dimensions
/team-shutdown
Team shutdown
Gracefully shut down an agent team, collect final results, and clean up resources
/team-spawn
Team spawn
Spawn an agent team using presets (review, debug, feature, fullstack, research, security, migration) or custom composition
/team-status
Team status
Display team members, task status, and progress for an active agent team
/api-mock
Api mock
Build realistic API mock servers with request stubbing, dynamic data, test scenarios, and contract testing
/performance-optimization
Performance optimization
Orchestrate end-to-end application performance optimization from profiling to monitoring
/feature-development
Feature development
Orchestrate end-to-end feature development from requirements to deployment
/block-no-verify
Block no verify
Set up PreToolUse hook to block --no-verify and other git bypass flags in Claude Code projects
/c4-architecture
C4 architecture
Generate comprehensive C4 architecture documentation (Context, Container, Component, Code) for a codebase using bottom-up analysis and four coordinated C4 agents.
/workflow-automate
Workflow automate
Automate CI/CD pipelines, releases, and development workflows with GitHub Actions, pre-commit hooks, and infrastructure automation
/code-explain
Code explain
Explain complex code, algorithms, and design patterns with step-by-step breakdowns, visual diagrams, and interactive examples
/doc-generate
Doc generate
Generate API, architecture, code, and user documentation from a codebase and automate keeping it current
/context-restore
Context restore
Restore saved project context and decisions to resume a session
/refactor-clean
Refactor clean
Refactor provided code for cleanliness, maintainability, and alignment with SOLID principles and modern best practices — no over-engineering.
/tech-debt
Tech debt
Analyze and remediate technical debt — inventory debt items, score by impact, and produce a prioritized remediation plan with estimated effort.
Your Personal AI Assistant; easy to install, deploy on your own machine or on the cloud; supports multiple chat apps with easily extensible capabilities.
16 views 0 likesAgent OS: the agent gets smarter on its own. We just hold the line: the grading command and expected result never make it into the success contract we hand it.…
17 views 0 likesCurated systems, benchmarks, and papers etc. on memory for LLMs/MLLMs --- long-term context, retrieval, and reasoning.
14 views 0 likes:memo: Vimlike Modal Text Editor in Rust
27 views 0 likesCI-native security testing for MCP servers. Attack simulation, schema drift detection, and health scoring before agents depend on them.
16 views 0 likesHermes Agent memory plugin/provider for scope-aware recall, SQLite truth, LanceDB semantic search, and hybrid retrieval.
15 views 0 likesFor You Agent——AI 时代的个人随身数字人格。把你的模型、AI 账号、技能、提示词和工作方式,带到每一个 AI 工具里。
12 views 0 likesA coding agent: give it a prompt and it reads, writes, runs commands, and searches code in a loop until the work is done, using native tool-calling across OpenA…
14 views 0 likesA secure persistent personal agent server in Rust. One binary, sandboxed execution, multi-provider LLMs, voice, memory, Telegram, WhatsApp, Discord, Teams, and…
14 views 0 likesSelf-evolving agent: grows skill tree from 3.3K-line seed, achieving full system control with 6x less token consumption
14 views 0 likesDeepSeek Harness Desktop (dsh-desktop). EAC: Embracing All Creation (揽尽万象). Bundled Node.js runtime with full dsh-CLI kernel, one-click startup, 10 built-in UI…
14 views 0 likesSee your agent think. Zero-config observability & governance for 26 AI agent runtimes: Claude Code, Cursor, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Cline, Ope…
13 views 0 likesSave 94% on AI coding tokens. Index your codebase, agents search instead of reading files. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI. Local MCP…
12 views 0 likesYet another coding agent harness, lightweight and written in go.
12 views 0 likesa coding Agent from pi. ∞ providers, sub-agents, hashline edits, and a permission gate
12 views 0 likesOmnigent is an open-source AI agent framework and meta-harness: orchestrate Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Pi, and custom agents — swap harnesses without rewriting…
25 views 0 likes🧠 Leon is your open-source personal assistant.
12 views 0 likesThe Station, an open-world multi-agent environment that models a miniature scientific ecosystem.
14 views 0 likesThe Frontend Stack for Agents & Generative UI. React, Angular, Mobile, Slack, and more. Makers of the AG-UI Protocol
23 views 0 likesVelaTerm = iTerm2 + Codex, The Best Terminal for AI Coding
21 views 0 likes