LLM Mart Basic

Stress-test a design through three lenses, confused user, skeptical engineer and impatient PM, before it goes to a stakeholder. Requires an actual design, an HTML file, Figma link or screenshot.

Reads the newest entry of a project's log.md and tells the student where they left off: what they did and decided, what is open, and the next step. Takes an optional project name. With several projects and no name, shows a menu of each project's last entry. Read only. Use when th

Diagnoses a broken course setup by reading the folder, so the student never has to describe the problem in English. Takes no argument. Reports which class they are on and which files are filled, then names one blocker and one fix: Claude Code opened at the wrong level, .claude/sk

Saves today's work session as a four-line entry (did, decided, open, next) at the top of the project's log.md, after the student confirms it, so a fresh chat can continue tomorrow with /pick-up. Writes to projects/<client>/log.md or career-vault/log.md, one entry per project touc

Host-side setup, configuration, customization, builds, migration, and troubleshooting for the Aerovato Container CLI. Use when working with Aerovato Container, settings.json, Dockerfile.User, build stages, V2-to-V3 migration, mounts, harnesses, tools, permissions, Docker, or Podm

Imported from gal-a/qikly/docs.

Write tests that can actually fail, by withholding the acceptance criteria from the agent that writes the code. Use when someone does not trust a suite that passes. Use when they want tests written from a specification rather than from the code. Use when they ask whether a specif

Drive a software or general-work outcome through Forge's composable Spec, Plan, Build, Acceptance, and Ship lifecycle. Use when the user explicitly asks to use Forge, asks Forge to explore, spec, plan, build, review, accept, verify, simplify, finish, ship, reconcile a Spec change

Independently review an exact code candidate, including UI markup and styles, for reachable defects, regressions, security, engineering standards, and test quality. Use when the user asks for a standalone code review, PR review, branch review, commit review, diff inspection, or c

Flutter Riverpod app architecture and Windows installer delivery. Use before changing a Riverpod Flutter app/package or its Windows desktop packaging/update pipeline; skip non-Riverpod stacks and pure-Dart work.

Flutter Riverpod app architecture and Windows installer delivery. Use before changing a Riverpod Flutter app/package or its Windows desktop packaging/update pipeline; skip non-Riverpod stacks and pure-Dart work.

Review PR, branch, commit or working-tree changes for concrete defects and fidelity to intended behavior. Also use when explicitly asked to independently challenge a prepared plan, diagnosis or verification claim.

Design or review module ownership, public interfaces and abstractions; UI token/component ownership; or domain-driven models, bounded contexts and invariants. Use for structural decisions, not routine edits within an established owner.

Prove real user journeys across browser, mobile, desktop, API and CLI surfaces using the project's existing test tools. Use for end-to-end verification, runtime UI review or requested visual proof.

Apply Hard Eng's planning, project context, verification and gate-adaptation guidance when implementing or reviewing code in an installed project.

Implement and verify a ready, authorized plan through focused fixes and integrated checks, ending with a ready-for-ship handoff. Use for implementation, bug fixes or resuming build work; skip planning-only, review-only and shipping-only requests.

Prevent verified repeated failures and preserve lasting decisions in terse ADRs. Use when failures recur, prevention needs strengthening, or accepted decisions and steering need durable capture; skip ordinary one-off fixes and routine task updates.

Plan a change before implementation, resolve material user decisions and prepare repository-grounded UX references. Use a compact plan for small changes; route large, unclear efforts or explicit Wayfinder requests to Wayfinder. Skip explanation-only requests and execution already

Deliver a verified build through a task branch and PR, check the intended remote result, and clean up the completed task safely. Use for PR creation, shipping, merging or release/deployment requests; skip planning, implementation and review-only work.

Make a voiced product marketing or explainer video from real product screens. Script, cut walkthrough clips or stage app screenshots with a cursor, pick voice takes, render branded motion graphics and diagrams, mix music and review every second before delivery.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Record the present state by mode — decision (ADR, RFC, rule), code (spec, doc, guide, scenario), or research (a ready report or one external material); a gate picks the document type.

First-time Archcore setup — wire host configs, measure the authored context, compose the full first-day seed in one preview, and create it on one confirm; import converts CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, rule files, ADRs, and docs into native documents; refresh adds new facts or drills into one domain.

Plan a feature or initiative through a computed route — a small fix exits with no documents, one capability gets a spec and a plan, a large initiative gets an umbrella PRD with one spec per capability; start with sdd, sources (market research), iso (regulated work), or research (technical investigation) to run that path directly.

Review branch changes against Archcore docs, or report project health; drift runs staleness detection, deep a full documentation audit, closeout closes a finished feature, experience captures a repeated pattern.

Verify that citations actually exist and that the claims they support are faithful to the cited source. Runs deterministic existence checks (Crossref / OpenAlex / Semantic Scholar / arXiv) plus a claim-faithfulness pass via the alterlab-citation-verifier skill.

Run a systematic, reproducible literature review on a topic and return an APA 7.0 annotated bibliography with a documented search strategy. Invokes the alterlab-deep-research pipeline in lit-review mode.

Run a full multi-perspective peer review of a manuscript, simulating an Editor-in-Chief plus three peer reviewers and a Devil's Advocate, and produce a structured editorial decision and revision roadmap. Invokes the alterlab-paper-reviewer skill.

Orchestrate the end-to-end academic research-to-publication workflow (research, write, integrity check, review, revise, re-review, finalize) with mandatory integrity gates and two-stage peer review. Invokes the alterlab-research-pipeline orchestrator.

Audit infra security: secrets, deps, CI/CD, webhooks, AI/skill files

Audit Solana program code for exploitable bugs and write a findings report

Compare per-instruction CU with the stored baseline to catch regressions

Build the web client (Next.js, Vite, React) and check env, types and bundle

Build Solana programs (Anchor, Pinocchio, native), incl. verifiable builds

Build the Unity project in batchmode for WebGL, desktop, Android or PSG1

Turn a solana-ai-kit fork into a project: set up CLAUDE.md, remove kit files

Un-ignore and commit the kit config dir, instruction file, .mcp.json and .gitmodules

Replay a user's failing transaction on forked state and map the error to source

Deploy a program to devnet, or to mainnet after the user's explicit go-ahead

Review the branch diff for Solana security issues, CU waste and AI slop

Read-only check of toolchain and kit config, with one fix-it command per failure

Offline-first Python AI agent that runs a tiny research business: quotes each job against its own costs, collects via Stripe, fulfils with NVIDIA Nemotron, pays…

DSH 插件 · 注入式优化器 0.8（主线）：你照常说话，它在你发送后,AI接收前把"这一轮到底要什么"理清楚，再把这份理解交给工作 AI(上下文注入) —— 原话不改写，条条带逐字依据。含控制界面（档位/权限/模型/上下文/只读工具）、拦截浮层（思维层+产出层）与真实 token 用量。可明显提升大多数模型的发挥稳…

Reliable AI Skill + MCP toolkit for agent-driven desktop CAD automation.

Curated real-world use cases for Hermes Agent — the self-improving AI agent from Nous Research. Backed by primary sources.

AI Agent 教学仓库 | 系统化 LangChain、RAG、LangGraph、MCP 全栈实战代码 | 万字博客详解 | 开源可运行示例 | 从零构建智能体

从 0 复刻 WorkBuddy-style 桌面 AI 助手 Harness：24 章 Python 教程，覆盖 Agent Loop、工具调用、记忆系统、Sidecar、沙盒审计、DeepSeek/OpenAI 评测轨迹

MCP server and CLI tools for web search and crawling, built on SearXNG and Crawl4AI

Delta MCP is a free app that sits between your AI apps and their MCP servers: one program per task instead of one tool call per step, up to 24.1× fewer tokens i…

Ava turns any Android 5+ device into a voice-first Home Assistant kiosk. Native C++ under the hood, so a 10-year-old tablet still listens, talks, and runs the h…

Roblox Studio macOS Window Capture Fix 2026: Real Screenshot Tool Instead of Magenta Playtest Glitch

LabTether