LLM Mart Basic
@llm-mart · Joined Jun 2026
Apply when introducing a new internal API while old callers still exist. Migrate callers and delete the old API in the same wave instead of preserving compatibility layers.
Apply when reviewing or shaping code that's hard to trace. Count layers between question and answer, and hidden state in the reader's head; collapse one-caller wrappers and shrink mutable scope.
Apply when writing stateful logic, or when code branches a lot or repeats a shape assumption across files. Encode the domain in a structure instead of scattered conditionals.
Apply when tempted to ask 'should I do X?' on reversible work. Proceed, present the result, let the human course-correct after the fact; reserve confirmation for irreversible actions.
Apply during planned rewrites and migrations with explicit phase boundaries. Converge on the target architecture; don't preserve smooth intermediate states with throwaway compatibility code.
Apply after completing a task, before declaring done. Verify against the real artifact (run the feature, read the actual value, inspect the diff), not a proxy, self-report, or 'it compiles.'
Apply when integrating a new requirement into an existing design. Redesign as if the requirement had been a foundational assumption from day one, instead of bolting it on.
Apply when concurrent actors might write to the same file, branch, key, or state object. Eliminate the sharing first; serialize structurally only when one shared writer is a real invariant.
Apply to multi-step work (sweeps, migrations, runs of similar edits) and to how you stack commits and PRs. Break work into small units that each end in a verifiable state, check each before the next, and order delivery so the sequence proves itself to a reviewer.
Apply when sequencing an addition, refactor, or rewrite. Remove dead code, redundant validators, and stub references first, then build on the simpler base.
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test. Identify a relevant defect and check that the test detects it. Assert the required result or observable effect, including absence when the contract requires it.
Apply when designing types, reviewing a function signature, or writing code in any statically-typed language. Make illegal states unrepresentable, brand semantic primitives, parse external data at boundaries, refuse to lie to the compiler, exhaust variants, derive from authoritat
Reconstruct your recent working context from your own chat history, live state, and the shared record (user reports, prior fixes, incidents), then hand back a tight current-state brief. Use for 'recall my work on X', 'catch me up', 'what have I been working on', 'where did I leav
Configure which models pstack uses per role. Detects available models and writes the current runtime's override sheet. Use for /setup-pstack, "configure pstack models", changing pstack's model choices, or turning the SessionStart hook on or off.
Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result). Local by default; commit it when a reviewer needs the trail to trust the result. Use for /show-me-your-work, autonomous or multi-phase runs, or
Fan out N parallel workers, drain them, and return one report. Use for /swarm, 'swarm this', or parallel coverage, races, gauntlets, and exploration.
Use only when the user explicitly asks for TDD, a failing test, or a regression test, OR when the bug has an obvious cheap local test target. Skip when the test path is unclear, expensive, integration-heavy, or not requested.
Explain a body of work plainly so a person actually understands it. Runs the `how` and `why` skills and weaves what they find into one clear explanation. Use for 'teach me this', 'help me really understand X', 'explain this change or subsystem to me'.
Layered technical-writing standard: Diátaxis structure, Google developer style sentences, STE instruction rules, Global English syntax. Use for /technical-writing or when writing or reviewing docs, RFCs, readmes, PR descriptions, or commit messages.
Run an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghetti-condition growth. Use for a thermo-nuclear code quality review, thermonuclear review, deep code quality audit, or especially harsh maintainability review.
Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes
Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds
Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.
Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.
A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.
A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.
None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.
Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.
Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen
CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.
Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it
An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server
31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions
The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.
Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.
Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.
"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks
stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.
The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.
Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.
/improve-agent
Improve agent
Improve an existing agent through performance baselines, prompt engineering, A/B testing, and staged rollout
/multi-agent-optimize
Multi agent optimize
Optimize multi-agent system performance through profiling, context window tuning, coordination efficiency, and cost and latency tradeoffs
/team-debug
Team debug
Debug issues using competing hypotheses with parallel investigation by multiple agents
/team-delegate
Team delegate
Task delegation dashboard for managing team workload, assignments, and rebalancing
/team-feature
Team feature
Develop features in parallel with multiple agents using file ownership boundaries and dependency management
/team-review
Team review
Launch a multi-reviewer parallel code review with specialized review dimensions
/team-shutdown
Team shutdown
Gracefully shut down an agent team, collect final results, and clean up resources
/team-spawn
Team spawn
Spawn an agent team using presets (review, debug, feature, fullstack, research, security, migration) or custom composition
/team-status
Team status
Display team members, task status, and progress for an active agent team
/api-mock
Api mock
Build realistic API mock servers with request stubbing, dynamic data, test scenarios, and contract testing
/performance-optimization
Performance optimization
Orchestrate end-to-end application performance optimization from profiling to monitoring
/feature-development
Feature development
Orchestrate end-to-end feature development from requirements to deployment
/block-no-verify
Block no verify
Set up PreToolUse hook to block --no-verify and other git bypass flags in Claude Code projects
/c4-architecture
C4 architecture
Generate comprehensive C4 architecture documentation (Context, Container, Component, Code) for a codebase using bottom-up analysis and four coordinated C4 agents.
/workflow-automate
Workflow automate
Automate CI/CD pipelines, releases, and development workflows with GitHub Actions, pre-commit hooks, and infrastructure automation
/code-explain
Code explain
Explain complex code, algorithms, and design patterns with step-by-step breakdowns, visual diagrams, and interactive examples
/doc-generate
Doc generate
Generate API, architecture, code, and user documentation from a codebase and automate keeping it current
/context-restore
Context restore
Restore saved project context and decisions to resume a session
/refactor-clean
Refactor clean
Refactor provided code for cleanliness, maintainability, and alignment with SOLID principles and modern best practices — no over-engineering.
/tech-debt
Tech debt
Analyze and remediate technical debt — inventory debt items, score by impact, and produce a prioritized remediation plan with estimated effort.
Open-source, self-hosted AI media server. One server replaces your entire media stack, with a web app, native iPhone app, and an AI agent that gets things done.…
3 views 0 likesA curated list of tools built for Jev — TypeSafe AI's System One model for typed decisions.
3 views 0 likes🦦 Crayotter: A Multimodal AI-Agent for Video-Editing, Video-Composing, and Video Production. Powered by Multimodal LLMs for autonomous Text-to-Video agentic fr…
3 views 0 likesWebextension tool for Odoo
3 views 0 likes基于多模态视觉感知与 LLM Agent 的 macOS 微信自动化框架 | Visual RPA for WeChat
0 views 0 likesThe operational superset of Pi Coding Agent — everything Pi, plus observability, governance, recovery, evaluation and multi-agent orchestration. Pi Coding Agent…
0 views 0 likesMetrik 可以集中查看本机多个 Agent 的配额余量和 Token 消耗,目前支持 ChatGPT、Claude、GLM、Kimi 等主流 AI 服务。
0 views 0 likesAn AI agent with a real self — soul she wrote, desires that drive her, a heartbeat for autonomous action, dreams she processes when you're away. Capability supe…
0 views 0 likesProduction-ready open source terminal coding agent with readable, layered code: permission rules, OS sandboxing, MCP, skills, sub-agents, and Anthropic, OpenAI-…
0 views 0 likesAnswer me with HTML — an agent skill that answers hard questions with a one-page HTML you can actually read. 让 AI Agent 用一页 HTML 回答复杂问题。
1 views 0 likesPrompt packs that make any AI agent a LaTeX expert — fix errors, polish writing, format for venues, read papers, recover source
1 views 0 likesClaude Code plugin: universal radial-tree exploration engine. One tree skill + swappable presets (brainstorm / attack / design / code-audit) for divergent ideat…
1 views 0 likesClaude Code + OpenClaw + Codex + WorkBuddy 中文教程 | 50篇完整教程 + 1张速查卡 | 80万+内容量 | 1500+实操示例 | AI Coding / Agent 四线学习路径(编程+助手+Agent+办公)
1 views 0 likesSmartLabelBench 2026: LLM-Powered Auto Annotation and Dataset Builder for Everything
1 views 0 likes从零开始玩转OpenClaw:最全面的中文教程,涵盖安装、配置、实战案例和避坑指南(github版)
1 views 0 likesNative Android GUI for running AI coding agents locally on-device. No terminal or PC required.
0 views 0 likes基于 LangChain/LangGraph 的 ReAct Agent ,结合 RAG、工具调用与 Streamlit 界面,面向智能客服与报告生成场景。
0 views 0 likesAn open-source, local-first AI learning workbench
2 views 0 likesOpen-source coding agent for your terminal, built in Rust and on a journey of continuous community improvement. Issues and PRs welcome.
2 views 0 likesMatt Pocock 技能集的中文翻译版 — 地道中文,原汁原味的技术术语。基于 mattpocock/skills 复刻。每日中午12点钟同步
2 views 0 likes