LLM Mart Basic

Use this skill when you need to design functional test plans or cases for business flows, UI, data, and integrations; triggers include functional testing and functional test cases.

Use this skill when you need evidence-bounded repeat inputs, version/model/prompt factors, invariants, variance evidence, and comparison boundaries; triggers include LLM 一致性 and LLM consistency.

Use this skill when you need to design LLM evaluation datasets, judges, metrics, and human-review boundaries; triggers include llm evaluation design.

Use this skill when you need evidence-bounded claim-to-source relations, unsupported assertions, abstention, uncertainty, and evidence review; triggers include LLM 幻觉 and LLM hallucination.

Use this skill when you need to test LLM behavior, failure modes, and evidence-based quality boundaries; triggers include llm testing.

Use this skill when you need to analyze logs into evidence, timelines, anomalies, and follow-up hypotheses; triggers include log analysis.

Use this skill when you need to plan manual or exploratory testing with charters, heuristics, and session records; triggers include manual testing and exploratory testing.

Use this skill when you need to derive test candidates from input transformations and expected relations when a direct oracle is limited; triggers include 变形测试 and metamorphic test design.

Use this skill when you need to identify, contextualize, and investigate metric anomalies from observability evidence; triggers include metrics anomaly analysis.

Use this skill when you need to design mobile test plans for iOS or Android covering functionality, compatibility, performance, network, and security; triggers include mobile testing and app testing.

Use this skill when you need to review mock fidelity, contract alignment, over-mocking, and drift evidence; triggers include Mock 质量评审 and mock quality review.

Use this skill when you need to derive test-path candidates from sourced behavior, state, or process models; triggers include 基于模型的测试 and model-based test design.

Use this skill when you need evidence-bounded delegation, coordination, shared state, conflicts, ownership, termination, and traceability; triggers include 多 Agent 协作 and multi-agent coordination.

Use this skill when you need to interpret mutation operators, killed and survived mutants, and evidence limits; triggers include 变异测试分析 and mutation testing analysis.

Use this skill when you need to discover invalid, denied, failed, degraded, or unsafe-recovery scenarios from product evidence; triggers include negative scenario discovery.

Use this skill when logging, metrics, tracing, alerting, or SLO design needs an evidence-bounded review before implementation; triggers include observability design review, telemetry readiness review, and alert actionability audit.

Use this skill when you need to identify interactions that need at least pairwise coverage after factors, values, and constraints are explicit; triggers include 成对测试 and pairwise test design.

Use this skill when you need to form evidence-based performance bottleneck hypotheses and validation steps; triggers include performance bottleneck analysis.

Use this skill when you need to compare performance evidence across versions and assess regression risk; triggers include performance regression analysis.

Use this skill when you need to interpret performance results, evidence quality, and risk without inventing conclusions; triggers include performance result analysis.

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Use MCP Inspector to connect to local or remote servers, inspect capabilities, call tools, read resources, test prompts, and diagnose failures before release.

Build an MCP server in TypeScript with focused tools, validated schemas, local and remote transports, Inspector tests, and production security controls.

This is the lane for changes with no behavior to test-drive — prose edits, a version bump on an

Use this after a pull request has merged but your local checkout is still on the topic branch.

Prints the public command catalog straight from `COMMANDS.md` — the plugin's own single source

This is the single entry point for turning staged work into a commit — nothing in codeArbiter

The protocol for a rule conflict — not a skill route, an orchestrator-level halt. When two sources

An optional, on-demand drift audit for the bypass case: a merge, a direct push, or a manual edit

This is the populator for a project that already has code to read. Instead of interviewing you about

This is where an unexplained defect goes before anyone touches code. The investigation is

This is the populator for a project that has no code yet to read. Rather than guessing at

Proves the install is actually enforcing, rather than just present. codeArbiter's worst failure

This is the standard entry point for new work with a human in the loop at every step. A short

This is the entry point for a defect that already has a known cause, or one you can describe

This is how a repository opts into codeArbiter for the first time. It writes the root-level state

A bare-numbers governance glance — three metrics, each with a trend arrow against the prior

The sanctioned, logged escape hatch. A routine gate — a lint rule, a style check, a non-security

Explicit PR entry and a direct request to open a PR use the same branch-finishing owner.

A zero-onboarding, read-only dry-run of the reviewer fleet against whatever is currently

This is a Feature Forge preview command — the after-each-turn service ships **off** by default and

Compares architectural records with the scaffold and prior decisions using SMARTS.

This is the lane for moving or reshaping code without changing what it does — a rename, an extract,

Ultra-lightweight, open-source, self-hosted personal AI agent framework in Python with WebUI, tools, memory, MCP, multi-agent workflows, automation, and chat ap…

Governance framework for AI coding agents. It runs them through a five-step workflow (plan, build, review, test, ship) where no step counts as done without evid…

Ultimate Multi-Agent OS for Autonomous AI NPCs 2026

Personal AI Agent Hub 2026 — Build Your 24/7 Autonomous Assistant

Proven 2026 Multi-Agent AI Review System – Verdict-Driven Quality Control

Slash API Batch: Cut AI Costs by 50% in 2026

Web dashboard for Hermes Agent — multi-platform AI chat, session management, scheduled jobs, usage analytics

Agent Skills for Solopreneurs

AirLLM dramatically reduces inference memory usage, letting 70B large language models run on a single 4GB GPU card

Zero, your trustworthy AI teammate for real work.

一套 DSH runtime，Desktop、Web 与 TUI 三种开发体验。

Open-source operational advisor for ClickHouse — real-time monitoring plus AI-driven index/partition/materialized-view recommendations.

⚙️ TypeScript Style Guide and Agent Skill. A concise set of conventions and best practices for consistent, maintainable code.

Framework for AI agents to build and maintain a digital brain through Obsidian wiki

Apache Maka (Incubating) is a local-first AI agent workspace. Model messages, tool calls, tool results, permission decisions, and termination events are recorde…

Neo.mjs is a self-evolving software organism: a professional end-to-end AI engineering team whose cross-model swarm inhabits live apps via Neural Link, Active H…

Agentic development harness for Claude Code — SPEC-driven plan/run/sync, TRUST 5 quality gates, model+effort routing, and Claude×GLM multi-LLM cost control. Sin…

NocoBase is an open-source AI + no-code platform for building business systems fast. Instead of generating everything from scratch, AI works on top of productio…

An open-source AI coding agent that lives in your terminal.

PawWork — free, open-source desktop AI agent for macOS and Windows. Alternative to Codex App and Claude Cowork. BYOK with 75+ providers, ChatGPT OAuth, local mo…