LLM Mart Basic

Produce a research report from the vault: scope the question against existing pages, name the gaps, and write findings with citations, disagreements and limits. Use this skill when the user asks for a research report, a deep write-up on a topic, or wants to understand a subject t

Produce a periodic review of a second-brain vault: what was added, which topics are growing, what contradicts what, which questions are still open, and what is worth reading next. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a weekly or monthly review, asks what changed in their vau

Clean a raw transcript before ingestion: punctuate, paragraph, label speakers, fix mistranscribed technical terms, and split long recordings by topic. Use this skill when the user drops an auto-generated transcript, subtitle file, podcast or lecture transcript, meeting recording

Draft from the vault: outline from concept pages, keep citations to the user's own sources, and surface where their material disagrees. Use this skill when the user wants to write an article, post, essay or newsletter based on what they have collected, or asks what they could wri

Use this skill when selecting and reporting verification for Skill changes; triggers include Skill change verification, quality gates, and evidence levels.

Use this skill when designing, running, interpreting, or reporting Agent Skill evaluations, selecting cases or judges, and analyzing trigger, benchmark, or regression evidence; triggers include Skill evaluation and evaluation design.

Use this skill when reviewing the contract completeness of Skills, Prompts, metadata, or QA documentation; triggers include Skill prose review, Prompt review, and contract audit.

Use this skill when auditing or trimming process residue from Skills, Prompts, comments, or docs; triggers include process prose cleanup, review residue, and current-state rewriting.

Use this skill when reviewing a complete Skill package for architecture, scope, triggers, independent installation, bilingual consistency, Eval readiness, and evidence boundaries; triggers include Skill quality review and package review.

Use this skill when you need to review acceptance criteria for ambiguity, missing rules, and verifiability; triggers include acceptance criteria review.

Use this skill when you need to design accessibility testing against WCAG, keyboard navigation, and assistive technology scenarios; triggers include accessibility testing and a11y testing.

Use this skill when you need evidence-bounded failure classification, retry/fallback/escalation, state consistency, user notice, and recovery evidence; triggers include Agent 故障恢复 and Agent failure recovery.

Use this skill when you need evidence-bounded checkpoints, heartbeats, resume, cancellation, duplicate submission, timeouts, and resource lifecycle; triggers include 长运行 Agent and long-running Agent.

Use this skill when you need evidence-bounded loop state, plan/action/observation cycles, stop conditions, budgets, repetition, and trace evidence; triggers include Agent 循环 and Agent loop.

Use this skill when you need evidence-bounded memory write/read/update/delete, retention, contamination, isolation, provenance, and forgetting behavior; triggers include Agent 记忆 and Agent memory.

Use this skill when you need evidence-bounded Agent identity, tool/resource scope, approval, denial, escalation, and side-effect boundaries; triggers include Agent 权限 and Agent permission.

Use this skill when you need to test AI agent tool-call contracts, authorization, failures, and side-effect boundaries; triggers include agent tool testing.

Use this skill when you need to test AI agent goals, state, planning, recovery, and safety boundaries; triggers include ai agent testing.

Use this skill when you need AI-assisted testing workflows such as test data generation, root-cause analysis, and prioritization; triggers include AI-assisted testing and AI for QA.

Use this skill when you need to test an AI-enabled product feature for behavior, safety, and user-impact boundaries; triggers include AI feature testing.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

"Tiered plugin quality review: branch (quick gates),

Check GitHub Discussions for highly voted learnings and promote them to Issues.

Evaluate Claude Code rules in .claude/rules/ directories for quality

Audit skill quality, frontmatter compliance, token efficiency, and activation reliability. Recommends improvements.

Test Claude Code skills using RED/GREEN/REFACTOR TDD phases in fresh subagents to prevent priming bias.

Validate hooks for security, performance, and SDK compliance

Validate plugin structure, schema, and naming. Use for plugin creation, debugging, or verification.

Initialize projects with architecture-aware templates using paradigm research and selection guidance for the target domain.

Generate an implementation plan with system architecture design and dependency-ordered task breakdown from a specification.

Guide project ideation through Socratic questioning to generate briefs with validated approaches and decision rationale.

Execute implementation plan systematically with progress tracking and checkpoint validation

Run full attune lifecycle as a mission with state detection and phase routing

Initialize a new project with git setup, CI/CD workflows, pre-commit hooks, Makefiles, and language-specific tooling.

Build a project skill library under .claude/skills/ as a resumable mission: discover, author in parallel, review adversarially.

Create specs from project briefs with acceptance criteria and testable requirements

Update existing project configurations to current best practices with selective component upgrades

Validate project structure and configurations against best practices with detailed issue reporting

Convene a multi-LLM expert panel to pressure-test strategic decisions with adversarial review and reversibility assessment.

Generate visual diagrams of codebase structure using Mermaid Chart MCP rendering.

Audit codebase for AI-generated code quality issues (vibe coding, Tab bloat, slop)

Your Personal AI Assistant; easy to install, deploy on your own machine or on the cloud; supports multiple chat apps with easily extensible capabilities.

Agent OS: the agent gets smarter on its own. We just hold the line: the grading command and expected result never make it into the success contract we hand it.…

Curated systems, benchmarks, and papers etc. on memory for LLMs/MLLMs --- long-term context, retrieval, and reasoning.

:memo: Vimlike Modal Text Editor in Rust

CI-native security testing for MCP servers. Attack simulation, schema drift detection, and health scoring before agents depend on them.

Hermes Agent memory plugin/provider for scope-aware recall, SQLite truth, LanceDB semantic search, and hybrid retrieval.

For You Agent——AI 时代的个人随身数字人格。把你的模型、AI 账号、技能、提示词和工作方式，带到每一个 AI 工具里。

A coding agent: give it a prompt and it reads, writes, runs commands, and searches code in a loop until the work is done, using native tool-calling across OpenA…

A secure persistent personal agent server in Rust. One binary, sandboxed execution, multi-provider LLMs, voice, memory, Telegram, WhatsApp, Discord, Teams, and…

Self-evolving agent: grows skill tree from 3.3K-line seed, achieving full system control with 6x less token consumption

DeepSeek Harness Desktop (dsh-desktop). EAC: Embracing All Creation (揽尽万象). Bundled Node.js runtime with full dsh-CLI kernel, one-click startup, 10 built-in UI…

See your agent think. Zero-config observability & governance for 26 AI agent runtimes: Claude Code, Cursor, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Cline, Ope…

Save 94% on AI coding tokens. Index your codebase, agents search instead of reading files. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI. Local MCP…

Yet another coding agent harness, lightweight and written in go.

a coding Agent from pi. ∞ providers, sub-agents, hashline edits, and a permission gate

Omnigent is an open-source AI agent framework and meta-harness: orchestrate Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Pi, and custom agents — swap harnesses without rewriting…

🧠 Leon is your open-source personal assistant.

The Station, an open-world multi-agent environment that models a miniature scientific ecosystem.

The Frontend Stack for Agents & Generative UI. React, Angular, Mobile, Slack, and more. Makers of the AG-UI Protocol

VelaTerm = iTerm2 + Codex, The Best Terminal for AI Coding