LLM Mart Basic

Produce a research report from the vault: scope the question against existing pages, name the gaps, and write findings with citations, disagreements and limits. Use this skill when the user asks for a research report, a deep write-up on a topic, or wants to understand a subject t

Produce a periodic review of a second-brain vault: what was added, which topics are growing, what contradicts what, which questions are still open, and what is worth reading next. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a weekly or monthly review, asks what changed in their vau

Clean a raw transcript before ingestion: punctuate, paragraph, label speakers, fix mistranscribed technical terms, and split long recordings by topic. Use this skill when the user drops an auto-generated transcript, subtitle file, podcast or lecture transcript, meeting recording

Draft from the vault: outline from concept pages, keep citations to the user's own sources, and surface where their material disagrees. Use this skill when the user wants to write an article, post, essay or newsletter based on what they have collected, or asks what they could wri

Use this skill when selecting and reporting verification for Skill changes; triggers include Skill change verification, quality gates, and evidence levels.

Use this skill when designing, running, interpreting, or reporting Agent Skill evaluations, selecting cases or judges, and analyzing trigger, benchmark, or regression evidence; triggers include Skill evaluation and evaluation design.

Use this skill when reviewing the contract completeness of Skills, Prompts, metadata, or QA documentation; triggers include Skill prose review, Prompt review, and contract audit.

Use this skill when auditing or trimming process residue from Skills, Prompts, comments, or docs; triggers include process prose cleanup, review residue, and current-state rewriting.

Use this skill when reviewing a complete Skill package for architecture, scope, triggers, independent installation, bilingual consistency, Eval readiness, and evidence boundaries; triggers include Skill quality review and package review.

Use this skill when you need to review acceptance criteria for ambiguity, missing rules, and verifiability; triggers include acceptance criteria review.

Use this skill when you need to design accessibility testing against WCAG, keyboard navigation, and assistive technology scenarios; triggers include accessibility testing and a11y testing.

Use this skill when you need evidence-bounded failure classification, retry/fallback/escalation, state consistency, user notice, and recovery evidence; triggers include Agent 故障恢复 and Agent failure recovery.

Use this skill when you need evidence-bounded checkpoints, heartbeats, resume, cancellation, duplicate submission, timeouts, and resource lifecycle; triggers include 长运行 Agent and long-running Agent.

Use this skill when you need evidence-bounded loop state, plan/action/observation cycles, stop conditions, budgets, repetition, and trace evidence; triggers include Agent 循环 and Agent loop.

Use this skill when you need evidence-bounded memory write/read/update/delete, retention, contamination, isolation, provenance, and forgetting behavior; triggers include Agent 记忆 and Agent memory.

Use this skill when you need evidence-bounded Agent identity, tool/resource scope, approval, denial, escalation, and side-effect boundaries; triggers include Agent 权限 and Agent permission.

Use this skill when you need to test AI agent tool-call contracts, authorization, failures, and side-effect boundaries; triggers include agent tool testing.

Use this skill when you need to test AI agent goals, state, planning, recovery, and safety boundaries; triggers include ai agent testing.

Use this skill when you need AI-assisted testing workflows such as test data generation, root-cause analysis, and prioritization; triggers include AI-assisted testing and AI for QA.

Use this skill when you need to test an AI-enabled product feature for behavior, safety, and user-impact boundaries; triggers include AI feature testing.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Improve an existing agent through performance baselines, prompt engineering, A/B testing, and staged rollout

Optimize multi-agent system performance through profiling, context window tuning, coordination efficiency, and cost and latency tradeoffs

Debug issues using competing hypotheses with parallel investigation by multiple agents

Task delegation dashboard for managing team workload, assignments, and rebalancing

Develop features in parallel with multiple agents using file ownership boundaries and dependency management

Launch a multi-reviewer parallel code review with specialized review dimensions

Gracefully shut down an agent team, collect final results, and clean up resources

Spawn an agent team using presets (review, debug, feature, fullstack, research, security, migration) or custom composition

Display team members, task status, and progress for an active agent team

Build realistic API mock servers with request stubbing, dynamic data, test scenarios, and contract testing

Orchestrate end-to-end application performance optimization from profiling to monitoring

Orchestrate end-to-end feature development from requirements to deployment

Set up PreToolUse hook to block --no-verify and other git bypass flags in Claude Code projects

Generate comprehensive C4 architecture documentation (Context, Container, Component, Code) for a codebase using bottom-up analysis and four coordinated C4 agents.

Automate CI/CD pipelines, releases, and development workflows with GitHub Actions, pre-commit hooks, and infrastructure automation

Explain complex code, algorithms, and design patterns with step-by-step breakdowns, visual diagrams, and interactive examples

Generate API, architecture, code, and user documentation from a codebase and automate keeping it current

Restore saved project context and decisions to resume a session

Refactor provided code for cleanliness, maintainability, and alignment with SOLID principles and modern best practices — no over-engineering.

Analyze and remediate technical debt — inventory debt items, score by impact, and produce a prioritized remediation plan with estimated effort.

AI coding platform for teams

AI Multi-Agent Framework in .NET

Production-ready code examples for Telnyx AI Communications Infrastructure — Voice AI, SMS, SIP, and IoT APIs

UltraGameStudio - AI coding agent for game development: engine workflows, gameplay code, and asset generation.

🦞 ResearchClawBench: Evaluating AI Agents for Automated Research from Re-Discovery to New-Discovery

The context-aware model router that learns & adapts to your long-horizon coding agent workflows. Lightweight & extensible, works with any harnesses, any models,…

Open-source sandboxes where coding agents build and deploy. Spin up isolated environments where Claude Code, Cursor, and other agents code and deploy software.

Native desktop UI for Claude Code with orchestration, streaming, background agents, and multi-provider support. Built with Tauri + React.

OpenCode mobile client via Telegram: run and monitor AI coding tasks from your phone while everything runs locally on your machine. Scheduled tasks support.

Terminal session manager for AI coding agents. One TUI for Claude, Gemini, OpenCode, Codex, and more.

Exposes internet search tools for use by LLM-backed Assist in Home Assistant

Templates and workflow for generating PRDs, Tech Designs, and MVP and more using LLMs for AI IDEs

Versus Incident is the self-hosted AI SRE agent. It learns what your system normally look like and escalates only what is new or unexpected issues — routing to…

Browser-native side panel for Hermes Agent — connect web context to your local Hermes runtime.

Agentic-friendly CLI generator for APIs: turn Swagger, OpenAPI, and google.api.http protos into single-binary CLIs with catalogs and generated Skills.

Open-source agent platform for Global × China enterprises — wire every system through one agent core. Self-hosted, any LLM.

Official python implementation of UTCP. UTCP is an open standard that lets AI agents call any API directly, without extra middleware.

An agent small enough to run anywhere. A minimal agentic runtime in C — ~380 lines, 54KB binary, ~2MB RAM. A skill file + an LLM + a shell loop, no framework.

AgentiLoop Agent! An Autonomous Agentic Agent for Mac, and exclusive Apple only harnesss. Suppprtd automation, scripting, coding, build anything and more. Power…

微信公众号 AI 运营助手 | 选题、写稿、审稿、排版、配图、发布全流程 Skill，支持 OpenClaw / Claude Code / Cursor / Codex