LLM Mart Basic

Choose simple, maintainable software designs by removing speculative complexity, comparing alternatives, and making explicit tradeoffs. Use for architecture, API, data-model, dependency, and scope decisions.

Implement software through small, repeatable, integrated vertical slices with clear exit criteria and honest verification. Use when a design is understood and code needs to be built or changed.

Review software with careful attention to correctness, maintainability, security, operations, and meaningful detail. Use for diffs, branches, pull requests, architecture decisions, or final quality checks.

Author a greenfield build blueprint in four gated stages — business logic, tech stack, logic-to-stack mapping, and a phase plan — each requiring explicit user approval before the next. Use when building a new project or a substantial new subsystem from scratch.

Step 0 of consequential software work under Monozukuri. Classify the task, assess its risk tier, choose execute or sensei mode, and compose the sequence of Monozukuri skills and the Definition of Done for it. Skip for trivial one-line edits, pure questions, and throwaway scripts.

Clarify software goals, constraints, stakeholders, and risks before consequential design or implementation work. Use for greenfield ideas, ambiguous requirements, architecture decisions, or changes where misunderstanding would be costly.

Prevent software mistakes through strong boundaries, safe defaults, meaningful tests, and mechanically enforced invariants. Use for TDD, validation, schemas, authorization, edge cases, regression coverage, or reliability-sensitive behavior.

Prepare software for responsible release, migration, deployment, rollback, and handoff with evidence about compatibility, health, ownership, and recovery.

Use when creating or updating AGENTS.md files, .github/copilot-instructions.md, or other AI agent rule files, onboarding AI agents to a project, standardizing agent documentation, or when anyone mentions AGENTS.md, agent rules, project onboarding, or codebase documentation for AI

Record a decision, document existing code, or file a supplied research material. Modes: document decision (ADR, RFC, or rule), document code (spec, doc, guide, or scenario for existing behavior), document research (only when a finished report or one external material is already i

First-time Archcore setup. Wires the host (MCP config, hooks, CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md managed block), measures the authored context the repo already holds, then composes a first-day seed — stack rule, run guide, data-model, integrations, config, entry points, public surface, a linked

Plan a feature or initiative through a computed route: the conductor derives the canon delta and assembles the document package — from a zero-document null route for small fixes to an umbrella PRD with one spec per capability for large initiatives. Modes, named as the first word:

The pre-merge review of a branch in a project that records its specs, decisions, and rules in .archcore/. Run this first for 'review my branch', 'review the changes before merge', or 'review before merge': it checks the changed code against the project's recorded canon and the ch

Pull a Korean brand's published DESIGN.md from the ko-design-md catalog (getdesign.kr) and apply its design language — colors, typography, spacing, radius, components, do's & don'ts — to the UI you are building in the CURRENT project. Use this skill whenever the user wants to bui

Add a new design.md catalog entry to ko-design-md. Use this skill IMMEDIATELY when the user wants to onboard a new brand into THIS project's catalog — produce services/{slug}.md (Stitch v0.1 format) plus services/{slug}.tokens.json (token-card sidecar) plus public/preview/{slug}/

프리뷰 산문(public/preview/*/preview.html — 라이트·다크 한 파일의 캡션 등 글 전체)이 services/*.md 나 상류가 뒷받침하지 않는 주장을 하는지 대조·판정할 때 쓴다. 판정 근거의 등급, 상류(Claude Design 번들 또는 브랜드 발행물) 확인 절차, 슬러그별 상류 판정표, 그 되돌리기가 남긴 판정 규칙을 담는다. 프리뷰 산문을 고치거나 "md에 없다"를 근거로 프리뷰를 정정하려 할 때 반드시 먼저 읽을 것.

Plug-in web search, X (Twitter) search, and page fetch for models without native web access. Use whenever the task needs current information, external facts, source links, posts from X, or the content of a specific URL, and the active model/harness has no native search or fetch t

添加新的前端应用

添加新的微服务

旧项目接入 PDLC

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Use MCP Inspector to connect to local or remote servers, inspect capabilities, call tools, read resources, test prompts, and diagnose failures before release.

Build an MCP server in TypeScript with focused tools, validated schemas, local and remote transports, Inspector tests, and production security controls.

An MCP server exposes tools, resources, or prompts through a standard protocol so an AI application can discover and use external capabilities.

Periodic multi-reviewer sweep of the whole codebase — surfaces a triaged checkpoint report.

Sanctioned lane for non-behavioral work — docs-only edits, dependency bumps, reverts. Type-scaled gates; no TDD demanded of prose.

Finish an already-merged branch — classify the leftover artifacts, return to a fast-forwarded default checkout, and delete the merged local branch. Every discard confirmed per item; containment proven, never assumed.

Show the codeArbiter command catalog — the public command list and what each routes to.

Run the full commit gate — the only sanctioned path to a git commit.

Stop everything and surface a rule conflict — persona vs. docs vs. code. Present both sides and the conflict-hierarchy level; the user resolves. No silent reconciliation.

Optional manual drift audit — report stale provenance-tracked docs, then per stale doc offer re-scout, re-baseline, or defer. Not the daily loop; commit-gate auto-heal owns routine maintenance.

Brownfield back-fill — scout an existing codebase and populate .codearbiter/, then lock it initialized.

Investigate-then-decide root-cause analysis for a defect whose cause is unknown. No code changes — exits to {{CMD:fix}}, {{CMD:adr}}, or a no-action close.

Greenfield decomposition interview — a layered interview that populates .codearbiter/ and locks it initialized.

Verify the active host install, package, command ownership, enforcement{{IF:pi}}, wrapper self-test, and active-dispatch coverage gap{{ELSE}}, and harmless live-fire probe{{END}}. Read-only.

Start a feature: brainstorm a spec, get it approved, then drive it test-first through the pipeline. The one entry to implementation.

Fix a confirmed bug: a failing regression test first, then a minimal fix, then the rest of the tdd gates.

Opt this repo into codeArbiter — scaffold the root-level .codearbiter/ state store.

Read-only 3-metric governance glance — override rate, small-lane rate, sprint low-confidence ratio — each with a trend arrow vs. the prior 20-commit window.

Author a new codeArbiter skill: prove the gap is real, get the spec approved, then write it.

Sanctioned, logged bypass of a gate or hard rule — one audit line, then proceed.

Open a pull request the only sanctioned way — clear every BLOCK-level review finding, then stage the PR. Never a direct write to the default branch.

Zero-onboarding, read-only dry-run of the reviewer fleet against the current uncommitted diff. Predicts reviewers, runs the state-free secret scan, writes nothing.

Trim transcript clutter to extend session lifetime — analyze, prune a copy, or toggle the after-each-turn service. Dry-run by default; gains land at resume/compaction, not the current turn.

Ultra-lightweight, open-source, self-hosted personal AI agent framework in Python with WebUI, tools, memory, MCP, multi-agent workflows, automation, and chat ap…

Governance framework for AI coding agents. It runs them through a five-step workflow (plan, build, review, test, ship) where no step counts as done without evid…

Ultimate Multi-Agent OS for Autonomous AI NPCs 2026

Personal AI Agent Hub 2026 — Build Your 24/7 Autonomous Assistant

Proven 2026 Multi-Agent AI Review System – Verdict-Driven Quality Control

Slash API Batch: Cut AI Costs by 50% in 2026

Web dashboard for Hermes Agent — multi-platform AI chat, session management, scheduled jobs, usage analytics

Agent Skills for Solopreneurs

AirLLM dramatically reduces inference memory usage, letting 70B large language models run on a single 4GB GPU card

Zero, your trustworthy AI teammate for real work.

一套 DSH runtime，Desktop、Web 与 TUI 三种开发体验。

Open-source operational advisor for ClickHouse — real-time monitoring plus AI-driven index/partition/materialized-view recommendations.

⚙️ TypeScript Style Guide and Agent Skill. A concise set of conventions and best practices for consistent, maintainable code.

Framework for AI agents to build and maintain a digital brain through Obsidian wiki

Apache Maka (Incubating) is a local-first AI agent workspace. Model messages, tool calls, tool results, permission decisions, and termination events are recorde…

Neo.mjs is a self-evolving software organism: a professional end-to-end AI engineering team whose cross-model swarm inhabits live apps via Neural Link, Active H…

Agentic development harness for Claude Code — SPEC-driven plan/run/sync, TRUST 5 quality gates, model+effort routing, and Claude×GLM multi-LLM cost control. Sin…

NocoBase is an open-source AI + no-code platform for building business systems fast. Instead of generating everything from scratch, AI works on top of productio…

An open-source AI coding agent that lives in your terminal.

PawWork — free, open-source desktop AI agent for macOS and Windows. Alternative to Codex App and Claude Cowork. BYOK with 75+ providers, ChatGPT OAuth, local mo…