LLM Mart Basic

Assess the scientific integrity and trustworthiness of publications before relying on their findings. Use this skill whenever evaluating a paper for a workflow, citing a study, building an analysis on published methods, or when a user asks about the reliability of a study. Checks

Evaluate ENCODE experiment quality using standard metrics and audit flags. Use when the user asks about data quality, wants to filter for high-quality experiments, needs to interpret quality metrics (FRiP, NSC, RSC, NRF, IDR, TSS enrichment, fragment size), wants to understand EN

Discover and characterize regulatory elements (enhancers, promoters, silencers, insulators, super-enhancers) using ENCODE data and the cCRE catalog. Use when the user wants to find candidate regulatory elements, identify active enhancers in a tissue, map promoter states, classify

Generate publication-ready methods sections, figure legends, supplementary tables, and data availability statements from ENCODE analysis provenance. Implements the scientific documentation standards requiring complete metadata reporting. Use when the user needs to write methods,

Conduct rigorous cross-study meta-analysis of scRNA-seq data from ENCODE, integrating multiple single-cell transcriptomic datasets for a tissue/cell type. Use when the user wants to answer "what cell types exist in my tissue and what genes define them?" by combining scRNA-seq dat

Search and explore ENCODE Project genomics data. Use when the user wants to find experiments, files, or explore what data is available for specific assays, organs, cell lines, or targets.

Set up the ENCODE Toolkit server connection. Use when the user needs help installing, configuring, or troubleshooting the ENCODE connector.

Find and work with ENCODE single-cell genomics data including scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq. Use when the user asks about single-cell experiments, cell type resolution, clustering from ENCODE data, deconvolution of bulk signals using single-cell references, or comparing single-cell vs

Track ENCODE experiments locally with publications, citations, and provenance. Use when the user wants to build a collection of experiments, manage citations, compare experiments, or track data provenance.

Query the UCSC Genome Browser REST API to retrieve regulatory tracks, DNA sequences, cCRE annotations, TF binding clusters, and track schemas for any genomic region. Use when the user wants to look up what regulatory elements exist at a genomic locus, retrieve DNA sequence under

Annotate genetic variants (GWAS hits, eQTLs, rare variants) with ENCODE functional data to interpret non-coding variation. Use when the user has variants of interest and wants to understand their regulatory context, identify causal variants from GWAS loci, assess variant impact o

Comprehensive guide for visualizing ENCODE data including deeptools heatmaps, IGV screenshots, UCSC track hubs, and publication-quality plots. Use when users need to create visualizations of ChIP-seq signal, peak landscapes, genome browser views, or any visual representation of E

Make software health, failure, degradation, and recovery visible through useful observability and diagnostics. Use when adding logs, metrics, traces, health checks, alerts, incident signals, or operational feedback.

Inspect the real repository, environment, dependencies, and runtime evidence before designing or changing software. Use for greenfield construction, unfamiliar codebases, uncertain behavior, or any task where assumptions could create rework.

Reflect on failures, incidents, reviews, and completed software work to turn evidence into durable tests, guardrails, documentation, and process improvements.

Debug software by making failures visible, reproducing them, finding contributing causes, and adding durable regression protection. Use for bugs, failing tests, incidents, regressions, flaky behavior, and unexplained production errors.

Improve software continuously through small, safe, behavior-preserving changes that reduce maintenance cost. Use for refactoring, cleanup, technical debt, naming, duplication, dead code, or post-change polish.

Choose simple, maintainable software designs by removing speculative complexity, comparing alternatives, and making explicit tradeoffs. Use for architecture, API, data-model, dependency, and scope decisions.

Implement software through small, repeatable, integrated vertical slices with clear exit criteria and honest verification. Use when a design is understood and code needs to be built or changed.

Review software with careful attention to correctness, maintainability, security, operations, and meaningful detail. Use for diffs, branches, pull requests, architecture decisions, or final quality checks.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

CoalWash self-update — check for a newer version and offer to apply it, or set how updates are handled.

Create an AI skill from any source (URL, repo, PDF, video, notebook, etc.)

One-command skill creation and packaging for a target platform

Sync a scraping config's URLs against the live documentation site

Generate and run validation queries for the current change

Generate and run validation queries for the current change

Check code-intelligence prerequisites (ripgrep + a language server) and print install hints

Create space-efficient paper and proposal figures (HTML mockups, TikZ, or skia-canvas) from tool selection through LaTeX insertion

Design concise overview, mechanism, or workflow figures as editable PowerPoint objects

Run the implement-review staged-change review loop

Detect the work type (papers, proposals, code, figures, admin) and dispatch to the right domain skill

Run prun: parallel delegation fan-out on Agy workers (the session coordinates)

Audit a GitHub README and rewrite it with modern patterns for a scannable ten-second skim

Vet the staged change: run the implement-review review loop (short alias)

Create space-efficient paper and proposal figures (HTML mockups, TikZ, or skia-canvas) from tool selection through LaTeX insertion

Design concise overview, mechanism, or workflow figures as editable PowerPoint objects

Run the implement-review staged-change review loop

Detect the work type (papers, proposals, code, figures, admin) and dispatch to the right domain skill

Run prun: parallel delegation fan-out on Agy workers (the session coordinates)

Audit a GitHub README and rewrite it with modern patterns for a scannable ten-second skim

AI agent orchestration kit for Windows, Linux/MacOS with Codex skills, hooks, routing rules and profiles for Claude, OpenCode, Cursor, Gemini and Windsurf.

Skills & reviewer agents for AI-first climate science — built and used by a PhD atmospheric scientist

出行路书工作流 skill：联网实查 + 多源交叉验证，产出可核验、能执行的旅行攻略。覆盖吃住行游拍避全维度，附美食情报卡、基准骨架与校验工具，支持一键部署在线版。

Self-hosted AI code reviewer with indexed PR reviews, walkthroughs, vulnerability scanning, dependency graphs, custom rules, and a learning loop.

🧬 Extend EvoScientist with Installable Skill & Knowledge Packs

Give the agent a machine. Just not yours. Each AI coding agent gets its own isolated machine with root, Docker, and systemd - active defense detects and stops t…