LLM Mart Basic

Atera customers and contacts: customer records and fields, contact management, custom fields, and customer lifecycle operations.

Atera service desk tickets: ticket fields, statuses, priorities, comments, work hours, and billing duration.

Auvik alerts: severity tiers, status lifecycle, dismissal semantics, and the common alertName patterns that show up in MSP NOC queues.

Auvik MCP fundamentals: the JSON:API envelope shape, basic-auth credential model, region routing, cursor-based pagination, rate-limit handling, and the v1 vs v2 device API distinction.

Auvik device records: device types, manageStatus and onlineStatus, lifecycle and warranty fields, and choosing between the v1 list endpoint and the detailed device endpoints.

Auvik network and interface entities: the network entity model, IP-range scoping, interface-to-device relationships, and adminStatus vs operStatus.

Autotask REST API fundamentals: header-based authentication, zone detection, the query/filter DSL (14 operators, logical grouping, includes), pagination, rate limits, and CRUD conventions across the 215+ entity PSA.

Autotask billing item retrieval, approval-level workflows, and invoice search — covering billing item types, approval status filtering, and reconciliation of billable work against invoices for MSP finance teams.

Autotask Configuration Item (CI) asset management: CI types and categories, lifecycle status codes, the CI field schema, related-item relationships, DNS records, notes, and contract/billing associations for MSP infrastructure tracking.

Autotask contract and service agreement management - contract types (recurring services, block hours, time & materials, fixed price, retainer), service/service bundle associations, SLAs, and how contracts drive billing for MSP account managers.

Autotask CRM entities - companies (accounts), contacts, and sites/locations - including field references, company type classifications, and how these records underpin tickets, contracts, and projects for MSP account management.

Autotask expense report and expense item structure - the report/item parent-child relationship, approval status workflow, expense categories, payment types, and the billable vs reimbursable distinction for MSP operational expenses.

Autotask picklist and reference-data lookups — queues, ticket statuses, ticket priorities, and project phases — the instance-specific configured values required before creating or filtering tickets and other entities.

Autotask product catalog structure - Products, Services, and Service Bundles - and how Price Lists override default unit pricing. Covers product/service fields, inventory tracking, and cost-vs-billing margin analysis for MSP quoting and procurement.

Autotask project structure - projects, phases, tasks, and milestones - including project and task fields, status values, resource assignment, and how project work links to contract billing for MSP project managers.

Autotask quote structure and line items - quote item types (product, service, service bundle, labor, expense, shipping), the mutually-exclusive catalog reference rules, and the three discount mechanisms (unit, line, percentage) used to build customer proposals.

Autotask Service Call data model - the ServiceCall / ServiceCallTicket / ServiceCallTicketResource three-layer structure - covering fields, status codes, and how tickets and technicians (resources) are linked to scheduled work.

Autotask ticket notes, attachments, and charges — the secondary entities attached to tickets: retrieving/searching notes and attachments, and creating, updating, or searching ticket charges for labor and expenses billed directly to a ticket.

Autotask ticket lifecycle: status/priority codes and transition rules, the ticket field schema, SLA calculation and clock behavior, escalation rules, ticket metrics, and the MCP tool surface (create, update, search, history, notes) for MSP service desk operations.

Autotask time entry structure: approval status codes and workflow, the time entry field schema, the billing rate hierarchy, budget and contract-limit validation, utilization analytics, and the MSP business rules for rounding and minimum billing increments.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Periodic multi-reviewer sweep of the whole codebase — surfaces a triaged checkpoint report.

Sanctioned lane for non-behavioral work — docs-only edits, dependency bumps, reverts. Type-scaled gates; no TDD demanded of prose.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:post-merge-cleanup}}

Show the codeArbiter command catalog — the public command list and what each routes to.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:commit-gate}}

Stop everything and surface a rule conflict — persona vs. docs vs. code. Present both sides and the conflict-hierarchy level; the user resolves. No silent reconciliation.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:context-check}}

{{SKILL_ENTRY:context-creation}}

{{SKILL_ENTRY:debug}}

{{SKILL_ENTRY:decompose}}

Verify the active host install, package, command ownership, enforcement{{IF:pi}}, wrapper self-test, and active-dispatch coverage gap{{ELSE}}, and harmless live-fire probe{{END}}. Read-only.

Start a feature: brainstorm a spec, get it approved, then drive it test-first through the pipeline. The one entry to implementation.

Fix a confirmed bug: a failing regression test first, then a minimal fix, then the rest of the tdd gates.

Opt this repo into codeArbiter — scaffold the root-level .codearbiter/ state store.

Read-only 3-metric governance glance — override rate, small-lane rate, sprint low-confidence ratio — each with a trend arrow vs. the prior 20-commit window.

Sanctioned, logged bypass of a gate or hard rule — one audit line, then proceed.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:finishing-a-development-branch}}

Zero-onboarding, read-only dry-run of the reviewer fleet against the current uncommitted diff. Predicts reviewers, runs the state-free secret scan, writes nothing.

Trim transcript clutter to extend session lifetime — analyze, prune a copy, or toggle the after-each-turn service. Dry-run by default; gains land at resume/compaction, not the current turn.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:decision-variance}}

AI agent orchestration kit for Windows, Linux/MacOS with Codex skills, hooks, routing rules and profiles for Claude, OpenCode, Cursor, Gemini and Windsurf.

Skills & reviewer agents for AI-first climate science — built and used by a PhD atmospheric scientist

出行路书工作流 skill：联网实查 + 多源交叉验证，产出可核验、能执行的旅行攻略。覆盖吃住行游拍避全维度，附美食情报卡、基准骨架与校验工具，支持一键部署在线版。

Self-hosted AI code reviewer with indexed PR reviews, walkthroughs, vulnerability scanning, dependency graphs, custom rules, and a learning loop.

🧬 Extend EvoScientist with Installable Skill & Knowledge Packs

Give the agent a machine. Just not yours. Each AI coding agent gets its own isolated machine with root, Docker, and systemd - active defense detects and stops t…