LLM Mart Basic

Atera service desk tickets: ticket fields, statuses, priorities, comments, work hours, and billing duration.

Auvik alerts: severity tiers, status lifecycle, dismissal semantics, and the common alertName patterns that show up in MSP NOC queues.

Auvik MCP fundamentals: the JSON:API envelope shape, basic-auth credential model, region routing, cursor-based pagination, rate-limit handling, and the v1 vs v2 device API distinction.

Auvik device records: device types, manageStatus and onlineStatus, lifecycle and warranty fields, and choosing between the v1 list endpoint and the detailed device endpoints.

Auvik network and interface entities: the network entity model, IP-range scoping, interface-to-device relationships, and adminStatus vs operStatus.

Autotask REST API fundamentals: header-based authentication, zone detection, the query/filter DSL (14 operators, logical grouping, includes), pagination, rate limits, and CRUD conventions across the 215+ entity PSA.

Autotask billing item retrieval, approval-level workflows, and invoice search — covering billing item types, approval status filtering, and reconciliation of billable work against invoices for MSP finance teams.

Autotask Configuration Item (CI) asset management: CI types and categories, lifecycle status codes, the CI field schema, related-item relationships, DNS records, notes, and contract/billing associations for MSP infrastructure tracking.

Autotask contract and service agreement management - contract types (recurring services, block hours, time & materials, fixed price, retainer), service/service bundle associations, SLAs, and how contracts drive billing for MSP account managers.

Autotask CRM entities - companies (accounts), contacts, and sites/locations - including field references, company type classifications, and how these records underpin tickets, contracts, and projects for MSP account management.

Autotask expense report and expense item structure - the report/item parent-child relationship, approval status workflow, expense categories, payment types, and the billable vs reimbursable distinction for MSP operational expenses.

Autotask picklist and reference-data lookups — queues, ticket statuses, ticket priorities, and project phases — the instance-specific configured values required before creating or filtering tickets and other entities.

Autotask product catalog structure - Products, Services, and Service Bundles - and how Price Lists override default unit pricing. Covers product/service fields, inventory tracking, and cost-vs-billing margin analysis for MSP quoting and procurement.

Autotask project structure - projects, phases, tasks, and milestones - including project and task fields, status values, resource assignment, and how project work links to contract billing for MSP project managers.

Autotask quote structure and line items - quote item types (product, service, service bundle, labor, expense, shipping), the mutually-exclusive catalog reference rules, and the three discount mechanisms (unit, line, percentage) used to build customer proposals.

Autotask Service Call data model - the ServiceCall / ServiceCallTicket / ServiceCallTicketResource three-layer structure - covering fields, status codes, and how tickets and technicians (resources) are linked to scheduled work.

Autotask ticket notes, attachments, and charges — the secondary entities attached to tickets: retrieving/searching notes and attachments, and creating, updating, or searching ticket charges for labor and expenses billed directly to a ticket.

Autotask ticket lifecycle: status/priority codes and transition rules, the ticket field schema, SLA calculation and clock behavior, escalation rules, ticket metrics, and the MCP tool surface (create, update, search, history, notes) for MSP service desk operations.

Autotask time entry structure: approval status codes and workflow, the time entry field schema, the billing rate hierarchy, budget and contract-limit validation, utilization analytics, and the MSP business rules for rounding and minimum billing increments.

The Autotask MCP lazy-loading pattern - four meta-tools (list_categories, list_category_tools, execute_tool, router) that expose the full 39+ tool catalog progressively instead of loading every tool schema upfront, plus the natural-language router for intent-based tool lookup.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Analyze code performance and propose three specific optimization improvements

Configure and initialize a project following the Product as Code specification for structured, version-controlled product management

Create a new epic following the Product as Code specification with guided workflow

Create a new ticket within an epic following the Product as Code specification

Update ticket status and track progress in Product as Code workflow

Validate Product as Code project structure and files for specification compliance

Audit application performance metrics

Conduct comprehensive PR review from multiple perspectives (PM, Developer, QA, Security)

Prepare and validate release packages

Load project context by reading key documentation files and exploring project structure

Analyze overall project health and metrics

Simulate project outcomes with variable modeling, risk assessment, and resource optimization scenarios.

Sync project structure to Linear workspace

Intelligently refactor and improve code quality

Prepare a new release by updating changelog, version, and documentation

Safely remove a task from the orchestration system, updating all references and dependencies.

Generate comprehensive reports on task execution, progress, and metrics.

Reproduce a specific issue by creating a failing test case

Resume work on existing task orchestrations after session loss or context switch.

Analyze team retrospectives for insights

The fastest way to put Volcengine Ark in your terminal and your AI agent — go from prompt to generated media, multimodal answer, or deployed endpoint in a sin…

本地私有、开源的自进化跨平台 AI 内容发现 Agent：先理解你，再主动从 B站、小红书、抖音、YouTube、X、知乎、Reddit、微博等平台与开放 Web 寻找内容。（支持 deepseek harness 插件） | Local-first open-source cross-platform AI cont…

Persistent memory for AI coding agents — one verified kb_search replaces the grep/find/ls orientation loop. Cross-repo, CPU-only, zero token spend.

AI 时代的伯克希尔：基于 Claude Code / Codex 的价值投资研究框架。巴菲特·芒格·段永平·李录四大师方法论 + 多Agent并行研究。| AI-era Berkshire: a value investing research framework built for Claude Code / Co…

The batteries-included, No-Code FinOps automation platform, with the AI you trust.

Open-source 3D AI agent framework — GLB/glTF avatars with LLM brains, memory, emotions, and autonomous payments. MCP server · x402 · Solana/EVM · Three.js. Embe…

XLSX parser for LLMs, RAG, LangChain, LangGraph, CrewAI, Claude, MCP — turns Excel (.xlsx) into citation-ready JSON with formulas, charts, dependency graphs, an…

Hermes-Relay — Your Hermes AI agent, in your pocket — chat, voice, and control.

A minimalist, terminal-native coding agent written in C.

AI-powered OSINT agent with interactive REPL, MCP server, and CLI. 19 tools. Works with Claude, GPT-4, or local models. For authorized security research only.

AI pair programming in your terminal — one static binary, sub-ms startup, any model

Where data access meets operational intelligence

Build your own security agents. Open-source framework for agents with live, read-only access to your infrastructure, with no path to widen it. Reasons across AW…

Multi-workspace terminal aggregator with Claude Code AI integration

Go implementation of AI coding agent

Harness engineering beginner tutorial, from 0 to 1

Generate images directly in DeepSeek Harness chats

A smarter, self-hosted AI assistant — multi-user, multi-agent.

Turn any research paper into a commercialization report — 6 AI agents, TRL/MRL scoring, patent landscape, market intelligence, verified citations. DeepSeek / Op…

Power BI CLI - semantic models (.NET TOM) and PBIR reports for token-efficient AI agent usage, built for Claude Code