LLM Mart Basic

Use before opening a PR, or whenever asked to self-review a diffusers contribution. Applies the same rubric as the `@claude` CI (checks the diff against references/review-rules.md, traces call paths for dead code). Reports findings grouped by severity, flagging what to fix before

Guide for performing Chromium version upgrades in the Electron project. Use when working on the roller/chromium/main branch to fix patch conflicts during `e sync --3`. Covers the patch application workflow, conflict resolution, analyzing upstream Chromium changes, and proper comm

Guide for performing Node.js version upgrades in the Electron project. Use when working on the roller/node/main branch to fix patch conflicts during `e sync --3`. Covers the patch application workflow, conflict resolution, analyzing upstream Node.js changes, building, running the

Write unit and E2E tests for Grafana frontend code (React/TypeScript, any package or feature area) to the conventions this repo expects. Use when adding, backfilling, or reviewing frontend tests; when a test only asserts "it rendered" or "it's defined"; when reviewing AI-generate

Write unit and E2E tests for Grafana visualization panels and viz utilities to the conventions this repo expects. Use when adding, backfilling, or reviewing tests for panels (barchart, timeseries, table, xychart, heatmap, canvas, etc.), grafana-ui viz components (Table, uPlot, Vi

Drive and verify the Kody app with a Feature Map and one CLI. Use when changing UI, account routes, preview deploys, or proving a Cloud Agent change with a real origin, session, and /health SHA.

Discover, wait for, sign in, create specific user data, and assert a PR preview deploy. Use on medium or high risk PRs, after pushing a ready-for-review PR, or when the user asks to test the preview URL.

Imported from modem-dev/ossrules/public/files/kody/.agents/skills/remix.

Take a change through a pull request in the pnpm repository — opening it, then staying with it after every push until CI is green and the review round is quiet. Use when opening a PR, after pushing to one, when a check fails, or when review comments arrive.

Run the tests that cover a change in the pnpm repository, in the Rust workspace (pnpm/, pnpr/) or the TypeScript CLI (pnpm11/), and recognize the cases where a scoped run passes without testing anything. Use whenever verifying a change before committing or pushing, or when decidi

Review PyTorch pull requests for code quality, test coverage, security, and backward compatibility. Use when reviewing PRs, when asked to review code changes, or when the user mentions "review PR", "code review", or "check this PR".

Use when modifying or reviewing Qwik core package code under packages/qwik, especially reactive primitives, signals, VNodes, cursor behavior, QRLs, optimizer-facing runtime behavior, or Qwik core tests.

Use when writing, modifying, or reviewing Qwik docs content or docs-site code under packages/docs, including docs routes, MDX content, generated LLM outputs, docs build behavior, or docs-specific e2e tests.

Use when creating, modifying, debugging, or running Qwik Playwright e2e tests under e2e/, including router, adapters, docs, CLI, and React integration suites.

Use when modifying or reviewing the Qwik optimizer under packages/optimizer, Rust transform code, WASM/NAPI bindings, optimizer snapshots, or optimizer-facing runtime behavior.

Use when modifying or reviewing Qwik Router code under packages/qwik-router, including runtime routing, buildtime route generation, middleware, adapters, SSG, markdown/MDX handling, or router tests.

Use when a user says "add a ty diagnostic", "write this new ty diagnostic", "change a ty error message", "review ty diagnostics", or asks to add, update, or review ty checks, diagnostic messages, subdiagnostics, or concise output behavior.

Use when a user says "minimize this ty ecosystem change", "reproduce this ecosystem result", "investigate a primer difference", "investigate a mypy_primer difference", "investigate a mypy-primer difference", or asks to reproduce, investigate, or minimize behavior changes in ty ec

Use when a user says "summarise ecosystem results", "summarize this ty ecosystem report", "what changed in this ecosystem run?", or asks to summarise or summarize ty ecosystem results for a Ruff PR from a PR number, PR URL, GitHub ecosystem-results comment, or detailed HTML repor

Add or review RustFS `tracing` events with the repository field shape, level policy, privacy boundaries, and guardrails. Use when a change adds or edits a tracing macro/instrumentation site or the logging guardrail script.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Periodic multi-reviewer sweep of the whole codebase — surfaces a triaged checkpoint report.

Sanctioned lane for non-behavioral work — docs-only edits, dependency bumps, reverts. Type-scaled gates; no TDD demanded of prose.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:post-merge-cleanup}}

Show the codeArbiter command catalog — the public command list and what each routes to.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:commit-gate}}

Stop everything and surface a rule conflict — persona vs. docs vs. code. Present both sides and the conflict-hierarchy level; the user resolves. No silent reconciliation.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:context-check}}

{{SKILL_ENTRY:context-creation}}

{{SKILL_ENTRY:debug}}

{{SKILL_ENTRY:decompose}}

Verify the active host install, package, command ownership, enforcement{{IF:pi}}, wrapper self-test, and active-dispatch coverage gap{{ELSE}}, and harmless live-fire probe{{END}}. Read-only.

Start a feature: brainstorm a spec, get it approved, then drive it test-first through the pipeline. The one entry to implementation.

Fix a confirmed bug: a failing regression test first, then a minimal fix, then the rest of the tdd gates.

Opt this repo into codeArbiter — scaffold the root-level .codearbiter/ state store.

Read-only 3-metric governance glance — override rate, small-lane rate, sprint low-confidence ratio — each with a trend arrow vs. the prior 20-commit window.

Sanctioned, logged bypass of a gate or hard rule — one audit line, then proceed.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:finishing-a-development-branch}}

Zero-onboarding, read-only dry-run of the reviewer fleet against the current uncommitted diff. Predicts reviewers, runs the state-free secret scan, writes nothing.

Trim transcript clutter to extend session lifetime — analyze, prune a copy, or toggle the after-each-turn service. Dry-run by default; gains land at resume/compaction, not the current turn.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:decision-variance}}

AI agent orchestration kit for Windows, Linux/MacOS with Codex skills, hooks, routing rules and profiles for Claude, OpenCode, Cursor, Gemini and Windsurf.

Skills & reviewer agents for AI-first climate science — built and used by a PhD atmospheric scientist

出行路书工作流 skill：联网实查 + 多源交叉验证，产出可核验、能执行的旅行攻略。覆盖吃住行游拍避全维度，附美食情报卡、基准骨架与校验工具，支持一键部署在线版。

Self-hosted AI code reviewer with indexed PR reviews, walkthroughs, vulnerability scanning, dependency graphs, custom rules, and a learning loop.

🧬 Extend EvoScientist with Installable Skill & Knowledge Packs

Give the agent a machine. Just not yours. Each AI coding agent gets its own isolated machine with root, Docker, and systemd - active defense detects and stops t…