LLM Mart Basic

Use when the user explicitly wants to discuss, brainstorm, compare options, or make a material preference decision, or when unclear intent needs guided clarification; do not use for clear execution or a single discoverable detail.

Use when a failure, regression, crash, flake, or unexpected result has an unknown cause that must be diagnosed before a safe fix; do not use when the cause and narrow fix are already clear.

Use when the user explicitly asks to persist until a verifiable result, fix until green, monitor through completion, or stay within a stated budget; do not infer persistence from difficulty.

Use when the user asks to add or refresh concise project-local Teamwork instructions in one named project; do not use to install global tools or create workflow records.

Use when the user asks for an implementation plan, task breakdown, checklist, roadmap, or handoff and the outcome and direction are already selected; do not use to choose the direction or execute changes.

Use when a broad or deep external investigation needs multiple source classes, claim-level evidence synthesis, or contradiction resolution; do not use for a narrow lookup or local code inspection.

Use when the user asks to review, audit, critique, or validate a stable code, document, plan, artifact, or claim; do not use to diagnose an unknown failure or create the initial candidate.

Use when the user asks to inspect, install, or refresh Teamwork-owned global surfaces; do not use as a prerequisite for another skill or to migrate project documents.

The Execution Trader's procedure for turning an approved ticket into one Hyperliquid action and reconciling it - the pre-send checklist, order construction rules, single-send discipline, unknown-result handling and the execution report. Use before and after every send, cancel, mo

What the desk does when something goes wrong on Hyperliquid - unknown send results, unexpected fills or positions, unprotected positions, stuck or orphaned orders, API outages, rate limiting, and suspected API wallet compromise. Contain first, reconcile from the exchange record,

How the desk watches markets and the account between trades using Grok Bot routines and WebSocket or polling watches - the desk brief, book checks, funding and price watches, alert conditions and what a watch may and may not do. Use when the user asks for briefings, alerts, "watc

How the HyperGrok trading desk works as a team of Grok Bots - roles, seats, shared workspace, evidence standard, approval model and handoff format. Use when setting up the desk, when a Bot is unsure who owns something, or when a request does not fit the normal trade lifecycle.

The Trade Reviewer's procedure for journaling desk activity and reviewing trades from the exchange record - process graded separately from outcome, execution costs measured, one repeatable finding per review, plus the weekly desk review. Use after any send, when a trade closes, o

How the Risk Manager writes the desk's risk limits with the user, sizes every proposed trade from live account state and Hyperliquid's real constraints, checks the book, and issues a PASS or REJECT with exact ticket fields. Use for setting up or changing limits, sizing any trade,

How the Strategist works with the user to turn their own trading idea into explicit rules, backtest it honestly on Hyperliquid candle and funding history, and paper-trade it on testnet through the desk lifecycle. Method only - the desk ships no strategies and makes no return clai

The end-to-end procedure for one trade on the HyperGrok desk - from an idea to a reviewed, journaled result - with the ticket format, who owns each stage, and what "done" looks like. Use whenever the user wants to open, adjust or close a position, or whenever any Bot is about to

Read a Hyperliquid account from the desk computer - positions and margin, spot balances, open orders including trigger details, fills, funding paid, ledger updates, order status by oid or cloid, historical orders, portfolio history, fee tier and rate-limit budget - with curl and

Less common Hyperliquid actions and their rules - dead-man's switch (scheduleCancel), TWAP orders, spot orders, expiresAfter and nonces, API wallet approval from code, sub-account and vault addressing, HIP-3 dexs, and what the desk deliberately does not do (transfers, withdrawals

Compact reference for the Hyperliquid API as the desk uses it - endpoints and envelopes, every /info request type, every /exchange action with its signing scheme, order and status vocabularies, asset ids, tick and lot rules, rate limits, WebSocket subscription list, error strings

Read live Hyperliquid market data from the desk computer with curl or the Python SDK - mid, mark and oracle prices, order book depth, funding (current, predicted, historical), open interest, volume, candles, perp and spot metadata, margin tiers, and how to save datasets for the s

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Validate application configuration with schemas, per-environment rules, runtime checks, and secure handling of sensitive values

Preflight a DGX Spark system for an ML training or inference workload and emit env-report.json

Set up debugging and tracing with remote debugging, distributed tracing, debug logging, profiling, and production diagnostics

Generate API, architecture, code, and user documentation from a codebase and automate keeping it current

Analyze and resolve errors across the full application lifecycle — from stack traces to distributed tracing — using systematic root-cause analysis and observability tools.

Set up error tracking and monitoring — implement structured logging, configure alerts, and integrate with error tracking services for real-time error detection.

Coordinate specialized review agents in parallel or in sequence and synthesize their findings into one code review

Analyze and resolve errors across the full application lifecycle — from stack traces to distributed tracing — using systematic root-cause analysis and observability tools.

Set up error tracking and monitoring — implement structured logging, configure alerts, and integrate with error tracking services for real-time error detection.

AI-assisted smart debugging — parse error messages, stack traces, and failure patterns to identify root causes and produce a fix with automated observability steps.

Generate comprehensive migration plans and scripts for transitioning codebases between frameworks, languages, versions, or platforms with minimal disruption.

Plan and execute safe, incremental dependency upgrades with minimal risk — including breaking-change migration paths and proper test verification.

Orchestrate legacy system modernization using the strangler fig pattern with gradual component replacement

Scaffold React and React Native components with TypeScript, tests, styles, and Storybook stories

Scan React, Vue, Angular, and vanilla JavaScript code for XSS vulnerabilities and report fixes with secure coding examples

Orchestrate end-to-end full-stack feature development across backend, frontend, database, and infrastructure layers

Orchestrate git workflow from code review through PR creation with quality gates

Create a role-specific onboarding plan for a new team member, from pre-arrival setup through the first 90 days

Enhance a pull request with a generated description, review checklist, risk assessment, and test coverage report

Orchestrate multi-agent incident response with modern SRE practices for rapid resolution and learning

Open-source, self-hosted AI media server. One server replaces your entire media stack, with a web app, native iPhone app, and an AI agent that gets things done.…

A curated list of tools built for Jev — TypeSafe AI's System One model for typed decisions.

🦦 Crayotter: A Multimodal AI-Agent for Video-Editing, Video-Composing, and Video Production. Powered by Multimodal LLMs for autonomous Text-to-Video agentic fr…

Webextension tool for Odoo

基于多模态视觉感知与 LLM Agent 的 macOS 微信自动化框架 | Visual RPA for WeChat

The operational superset of Pi Coding Agent — everything Pi, plus observability, governance, recovery, evaluation and multi-agent orchestration. Pi Coding Agent…

Metrik 可以集中查看本机多个 Agent 的配额余量和 Token 消耗，目前支持 ChatGPT、Claude、GLM、Kimi 等主流 AI 服务。

An AI agent with a real self — soul she wrote, desires that drive her, a heartbeat for autonomous action, dreams she processes when you're away. Capability supe…

Production-ready open source terminal coding agent with readable, layered code: permission rules, OS sandboxing, MCP, skills, sub-agents, and Anthropic, OpenAI-…

Answer me with HTML — an agent skill that answers hard questions with a one-page HTML you can actually read. 让 AI Agent 用一页 HTML 回答复杂问题。

Prompt packs that make any AI agent a LaTeX expert — fix errors, polish writing, format for venues, read papers, recover source

Claude Code plugin: universal radial-tree exploration engine. One tree skill + swappable presets (brainstorm / attack / design / code-audit) for divergent ideat…

Claude Code + OpenClaw + Codex + WorkBuddy 中文教程 | 50篇完整教程 + 1张速查卡 | 80万+内容量 | 1500+实操示例 | AI Coding / Agent 四线学习路径（编程+助手+Agent+办公）

SmartLabelBench 2026: LLM-Powered Auto Annotation and Dataset Builder for Everything

从零开始玩转OpenClaw：最全面的中文教程，涵盖安装、配置、实战案例和避坑指南（github版）

Native Android GUI for running AI coding agents locally on-device. No terminal or PC required.

基于 LangChain/LangGraph 的 ReAct Agent ，结合 RAG、工具调用与 Streamlit 界面，面向智能客服与报告生成场景。

An open-source, local-first AI learning workbench

Open-source coding agent for your terminal, built in Rust and on a journey of continuous community improvement. Issues and PRs welcome.

Matt Pocock 技能集的中文翻译版 — 地道中文，原汁原味的技术术语。基于 mattpocock/skills 复刻。每日中午12点钟同步