LLM Mart Basic

Review an upstream documentation change against the skills, agent instructions, or runbooks that cite it. Identify supported updates, unaffected instructions, and unresolved version or evidence gaps. Use with a supplied source diff or Skill Watch result.

Turn a repository issue into an evidence-backed triage note: observed behavior, missing reproduction details, possible duplicates, and the next useful action. Use for issue triage, not implementation or bulk issue closure.

Verify a proposed bug fix against an unchanged regression test and the relevant existing tests, reporting baseline and candidate outcomes separately. Use for fix verification, not a general claim that software is bug-free.

Draft factual project announcements, GitHub launch posts, and development updates for a specified audience or platform. Use to explain shipped work clearly, with evidence and a useful invitation for feedback.

Draft clear, respectful replies to issues, PR discussions, and technical support reports from available evidence. Use to explain status, request a minimal reproduction, or communicate a project decision without inventing commitments.

Create or improve a repository README from actual project evidence, with a clear purpose, usable quickstart, and honest limitations. Use for project landing documentation and onboarding, rather than long tutorials or release notes.

Write a focused regression test from an established bug reproduction and public behavior. Use when a fix needs a test that fails on the affected version; avoid mirroring the implementation or weakening assertions.

Build a step-by-step technical tutorial around a reproducible outcome, with prerequisites, checkpoints, and recovery steps. Use for hands-on guides when a README quickstart is too short.

Write or revise interface labels, errors, empty states, and confirmation text from actual product behavior. Use for UI microcopy with clear next actions, preserved localization tokens, and explicit length constraints.

Investigate training failures, NaNs, missing gradients, misleading losses, and non-reproducible runs in PyTorch, Lightning, or TensorFlow/Keras. Use for a concrete training bug or regression, not an open-ended architecture or hyperparameter search.

Edit stiff or AI-sounding prose into natural writing while preserving meaning, facts, citations, and the author's point of view. Use when asked to humanize, de-AI, or make an existing draft sound more human, in its original language.

Translate and localize Polish and English technical documentation, UI text, and project updates. Use for natural PL/EN phrasing while preserving commands, placeholders, factual precision, and a project glossary.

Adapt a draft to a user's writing samples or explicit tone brief. Use for consistent personal or project voice across docs and posts; distinguish style evidence from factual content.

Prepare release notes and migration guidance from a verified revision range and project release policy. Use for release preparation; never present open PRs or planned changes as shipped features.

Reduce a reported software bug to a runnable, minimal reproduction with the exact command, environment, and observed failure. Use when verifying a bug report; do not infer success from a failing setup command.

Review a pull request for concrete correctness regressions using its diff, surrounding code, and relevant tests. Use for a requested PR review; distinguish actionable defects from optional preferences.

Review an upstream documentation change against the skills, agent instructions, or runbooks that cite it. Identify supported updates, unaffected instructions, and unresolved version or evidence gaps. Use with a supplied source diff or Skill Watch result.

Turn a repository issue into an evidence-backed triage note: observed behavior, missing reproduction details, possible duplicates, and the next useful action. Use for issue triage, not implementation or bulk issue closure.

Verify a proposed bug fix against an unchanged regression test and the relevant existing tests, reporting baseline and candidate outcomes separately. Use for fix verification, not a general claim that software is bug-free.

Draft factual project announcements, GitHub launch posts, and development updates for a specified audience or platform. Use to explain shipped work clearly, with evidence and a useful invitation for feedback.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Assemble the governance record for a range — commits, overrides, ADRs, sprint auto-decisions, open questions, checkpoint findings — into one dated audit packet. Read-only.

Lightweight Q&A about the project — answer from context and return, no routing, no state change.

Periodic multi-reviewer sweep of the whole codebase — surfaces a triaged checkpoint report.

Sanctioned lane for non-behavioral work — docs-only edits, dependency bumps, reverts. Type-scaled gates; no TDD demanded of prose.

Clean up an already-merged local branch after proving containment. Confirm each discard and preserve unique work.

Show the codeArbiter command catalog — the public command list and what each routes to.

Create a verified local Git commit when committing changes is requested. Not for explaining commit history, drafting a message only, or postponing a commit. Applies every commit gate and never implies a push or PR.

Stop everything and surface a rule conflict — persona vs. docs vs. code. Present both sides and the conflict-hierarchy level; the user resolves. No silent reconciliation.

Audit stale provenance-tracked docs on request. Report first; re-scout or re-baseline only for selected docs.

Build project context from an existing codebase through isolated scouts, resolve gaps, and preserve initialization gates.

Investigate an unexplained defect or unexpected behavior without changing application code. Use for root-cause diagnosis and an evidence-backed handoff. A no-action close records a board note. Not for implementing a known fix, new features, or explanation-only questions.

Develop greenfield project context through a layered interview, preserve decisions, and initialize only after the required gates.

Verify the active host install, package, command ownership, enforcement, and harmless live-fire probe. Read-only.

Start a feature: brainstorm a spec, get it approved, then drive it test-first through the pipeline. The one entry to implementation.

Fix a confirmed bug: a failing regression test first, then a minimal fix, then the rest of the tdd gates.

Opt this repo into codeArbiter — scaffold the root-level .codearbiter/ state store.

Read-only 3-metric governance glance — override rate, small-lane rate, sprint low-confidence ratio — each with a trend arrow vs. the prior 20-commit window.

Sanctioned, logged bypass of a gate or hard rule — one audit line, then proceed.

Open a PR or finish branch disposition; route CI watching and post-merge cleanup to their owners. Merge and discard need explicit authority.

Zero-onboarding, read-only dry-run of the reviewer fleet against the current uncommitted diff. Predicts reviewers, runs the state-free secret scan, writes nothing.

The fastest way to put Volcengine Ark in your terminal and your AI agent — go from prompt to generated media, multimodal answer, or deployed endpoint in a sin…

本地私有、开源的自进化跨平台 AI 内容发现 Agent：先理解你，再主动从 B站、小红书、抖音、YouTube、X、知乎、Reddit、微博等平台与开放 Web 寻找内容。（支持 deepseek harness 插件） | Local-first open-source cross-platform AI cont…

Persistent memory for AI coding agents — one verified kb_search replaces the grep/find/ls orientation loop. Cross-repo, CPU-only, zero token spend.

AI 时代的伯克希尔：基于 Claude Code / Codex 的价值投资研究框架。巴菲特·芒格·段永平·李录四大师方法论 + 多Agent并行研究。| AI-era Berkshire: a value investing research framework built for Claude Code / Co…

The batteries-included, No-Code FinOps automation platform, with the AI you trust.

Open-source 3D AI agent framework — GLB/glTF avatars with LLM brains, memory, emotions, and autonomous payments. MCP server · x402 · Solana/EVM · Three.js. Embe…

XLSX parser for LLMs, RAG, LangChain, LangGraph, CrewAI, Claude, MCP — turns Excel (.xlsx) into citation-ready JSON with formulas, charts, dependency graphs, an…

Hermes-Relay — Your Hermes AI agent, in your pocket — chat, voice, and control.

A minimalist, terminal-native coding agent written in C.

AI-powered OSINT agent with interactive REPL, MCP server, and CLI. 19 tools. Works with Claude, GPT-4, or local models. For authorized security research only.

AI pair programming in your terminal — one static binary, sub-ms startup, any model

Where data access meets operational intelligence

Build your own security agents. Open-source framework for agents with live, read-only access to your infrastructure, with no path to widen it. Reasons across AW…

Multi-workspace terminal aggregator with Claude Code AI integration

Go implementation of AI coding agent

Harness engineering beginner tutorial, from 0 to 1

Generate images directly in DeepSeek Harness chats

A smarter, self-hosted AI assistant — multi-user, multi-agent.

Turn any research paper into a commercialization report — 6 AI agents, TRL/MRL scoring, patent landscape, market intelligence, verified citations. DeepSeek / Op…

Power BI CLI - semantic models (.NET TOM) and PBIR reports for token-efficient AI agent usage, built for Claude Code