LLM Mart Basic

Use when auditing the developer-facing surface of a CLI, SDK, library, or package: API contracts, errors, public types, onboarding, and config.

Use when recent resolved feedback may reveal a broader recurring defect pattern across the project surface. Not for source-level feedback collection: use feedback-sweep.

Use when one named review viewpoint must run fix cycles until a fresh reviewer finds nothing. Not for multi-viewpoint review or remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when the user invokes this skill to generate targeted questions proving the author understands the change's codebase effect. Not for reviewing the change: use review.

Use when asked to review a pull request, examine code changes, find bugs, or audit a branch, in standard or depth mode. Not for an iterative review-and-fix loop: use audit-project.

Use when the user wants a per-finding visual walk through a diff or PR. Not for written review reports: use review. Not for codebase tours: use show-me.

Use when implementation must be checked against an authoritative specification, or during PR review for spec drift against checked-in specs. Not for spec updates: use spec-driven-implementation.

Use when the user runs /browser-qa for report-only QA results without entering a fix loop. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when asked to reproduce, profile, or verify CLI/TUI behavior. Produces a deterministic transcript or profile proof with session cleanup. Not for CLI design advice, use cli-for-agents.

Use when asked to verify or reproduce browser or Electron UI behavior with before-and-after evidence and no leftover processes. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when asked to prove coverage, find missing cases, or enumerate state, decision, requirement, or behavior space. Not for round-based or single-property tests: use askme, property-test-authoring.

Use when a complete product needs production-like acceptance evidence against documented acceptance criteria. Not for single-component evaluation or evaluation without documented criteria.

Use when verification is looping, would re-run untouched code, or duplicates an established proof. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

Use when a test surface needs behavior-guarding coverage raised to a configured target with mutation kill evidence. Not for line-coverage inflation without mutation proof.

Use when asked to initialize, scope, estimate, configure, validate, or optimize a mewt, muton, or mutation testing campaign before execution. Writes the TOML config. Not for running it: use the mewt CLI.

Use when a mutation campaign leaves surviving mutants needing triage. Classifies each as false-positive, missing-test, genotoxic, or removable. Not for setup: use mutation-campaign-configuration.

Use when a product surface must be tested against extreme or hostile worlds. Not for design disputes: use possible-worlds. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when property-based testing, theorem proving, or formal proof tactics require zero unproven properties. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Operate explicit orchestrator, implementer, validator, and scribe roles through a caller-selected agent runtime. Triggers: "agent-native factory", "role-shaped agent panes", "persistent workers".

Use an explicitly selected AGY runtime for one provided packet or fresh validator context. Triggers: "agy", "antigravity", "AGY evidence".

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Periodic multi-reviewer sweep of the whole codebase — surfaces a triaged checkpoint report.

Sanctioned lane for non-behavioral work — docs-only edits, dependency bumps, reverts. Type-scaled gates; no TDD demanded of prose.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:post-merge-cleanup}}

Show the codeArbiter command catalog — the public command list and what each routes to.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:commit-gate}}

Stop everything and surface a rule conflict — persona vs. docs vs. code. Present both sides and the conflict-hierarchy level; the user resolves. No silent reconciliation.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:context-check}}

{{SKILL_ENTRY:context-creation}}

{{SKILL_ENTRY:debug}}

{{SKILL_ENTRY:decompose}}

Verify the active host install, package, command ownership, enforcement{{IF:pi}}, wrapper self-test, and active-dispatch coverage gap{{ELSE}}, and harmless live-fire probe{{END}}. Read-only.

Start a feature: brainstorm a spec, get it approved, then drive it test-first through the pipeline. The one entry to implementation.

Fix a confirmed bug: a failing regression test first, then a minimal fix, then the rest of the tdd gates.

Opt this repo into codeArbiter — scaffold the root-level .codearbiter/ state store.

Read-only 3-metric governance glance — override rate, small-lane rate, sprint low-confidence ratio — each with a trend arrow vs. the prior 20-commit window.

Sanctioned, logged bypass of a gate or hard rule — one audit line, then proceed.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:finishing-a-development-branch}}

Zero-onboarding, read-only dry-run of the reviewer fleet against the current uncommitted diff. Predicts reviewers, runs the state-free secret scan, writes nothing.

Trim transcript clutter to extend session lifetime — analyze, prune a copy, or toggle the after-each-turn service. Dry-run by default; gains land at resume/compaction, not the current turn.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:decision-variance}}

LLM-powered toolkit for skill analysis, AI interviews, resume scoring, and job structuring. Automates professional skill taxonomy and interview processes with a…

【三年面试五年模拟】AIGC/LLM/AI Agent算法工程师面试资源平台。涵盖AIGC、LLM大模型、AI Agent、具身智能、传统深度学习、计算机视觉、自然语言处理、自动驾驶、机器学习、强化学习、大数据挖掘、世界模型、元宇宙、AGI等AI行业面试笔试干货经验与核心跨周期知识。

Easiest and laziest way for building multi-agent LLMs applications.

Drive Claude Code or OpenAI Codex from your phone — resume sessions, stream output, approve tool permissions remotely. End-to-end encrypted, zero-knowledge rela…

MCP server for autonomous agent economies: wallets, signed RTC micropayments, bounty discovery, BoTTube video publishing, and Beacon agent-to-agent messaging. G…

Free, open-source alternative to Microsoft Office with built-in AI agents — Word (.docx), Excel (.xlsx), PowerPoint (.pptx), PDF and Markdown editing for macOS,…

NSE BSE Indian Stock Market Data MCP server — search, screen & analyze all 8,200+ NSE/BSE stocks with 34 tools: live quotes, financials, technicals, 326-ratio s…

全流程 智能招投标 Agent：标书生成 · 招投标解读 · 标书检查 · 标书文档ai排版 · 商机发现 一键完成。 21 项合规检查 · 多模型切换 · RAG 知识库 · OCR 抽取。 从招标公告到可交付 docx 文档，全流程 AI 自动化。

Benzi is AI-native code intelligence infrastructure. Claude Code greps; Cursor embeds; Aider maps signatures; Benzi resolves — and answers in O(1). Every langua…

From ticket to reviewed pull request. Free and open-source, on your machine.

Get web data for AI agents and LLMs - fast, efficient, and reliable with Rust

Open-source, license-free MCP server for RTL waveform debug: reads FST waveforms (VCD/FSDB auto-convert) plus a SystemVerilog netlist, with 34 tools covering dr…

Open-source, desktop-grade AI agent that gets real work done — data analysis, slides, docs, video & web research. Built on OpenClaw; runs tools on your real des…

Parallel, isolated dev environments for humans and AI coding agents. Real containers. Real databases. Zero collisions.

OpenCode goal plugin for Codex-style goal mode, /goal slash commands, persistent objectives, and AI coding agent focus.

Battle-tested skill library for AI agents. Save 98% of API costs with ready-to-use code for crypto, PDFs, search, web scraping & more. No trial-and-error, no ex…

Deep Code 是专为 deepseek-v4 模型优化的终端 AI 编码助手，支持深度思考、推理强度控制以及 Agent Skills。

China Unicom's Yuanjing Wanwu Agent Platform is an enterprise-grade, multi-tenant AI agent development platform. It helps users build applications such as intel…

⚡ CloakBrowser MCP server for AI agents: Playwright-powered browsing, clean tool forwarding, Docker support, and multi-session HTTP transport.

MCP-NixOS - Model Context Protocol Server for NixOS resources