LLM Mart Basic

Use when recent resolved feedback may reveal a broader recurring defect pattern across the project surface. Not for source-level feedback collection: use feedback-sweep.

Use when one named review viewpoint must run fix cycles until a fresh reviewer finds nothing. Not for multi-viewpoint review or remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when the user invokes this skill to generate targeted questions proving the author understands the change's codebase effect. Not for reviewing the change: use review.

Use when asked to review a pull request, examine code changes, find bugs, or audit a branch, in standard or depth mode. Not for an iterative review-and-fix loop: use audit-project.

Use when the user wants a per-finding visual walk through a diff or PR. Not for written review reports: use review. Not for codebase tours: use show-me.

Use when implementation must be checked against an authoritative specification, or during PR review for spec drift against checked-in specs. Not for spec updates: use spec-driven-implementation.

Use when the user runs /browser-qa for report-only QA results without entering a fix loop. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when asked to reproduce, profile, or verify CLI/TUI behavior. Produces a deterministic transcript or profile proof with session cleanup. Not for CLI design advice, use cli-for-agents.

Use when asked to verify or reproduce browser or Electron UI behavior with before-and-after evidence and no leftover processes. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when asked to prove coverage, find missing cases, or enumerate state, decision, requirement, or behavior space. Not for round-based or single-property tests: use askme, property-test-authoring.

Use when a complete product needs production-like acceptance evidence against documented acceptance criteria. Not for single-component evaluation or evaluation without documented criteria.

Use when verification is looping, would re-run untouched code, or duplicates an established proof. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

Use when a test surface needs behavior-guarding coverage raised to a configured target with mutation kill evidence. Not for line-coverage inflation without mutation proof.

Use when asked to initialize, scope, estimate, configure, validate, or optimize a mewt, muton, or mutation testing campaign before execution. Writes the TOML config. Not for running it: use the mewt CLI.

Use when a mutation campaign leaves surviving mutants needing triage. Classifies each as false-positive, missing-test, genotoxic, or removable. Not for setup: use mutation-campaign-configuration.

Use when a product surface must be tested against extreme or hostile worlds. Not for design disputes: use possible-worlds. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when property-based testing, theorem proving, or formal proof tactics require zero unproven properties. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Operate explicit orchestrator, implementer, validator, and scribe roles through a caller-selected agent runtime. Triggers: "agent-native factory", "role-shaped agent panes", "persistent workers".

Use an explicitly selected AGY runtime for one provided packet or fresh validator context. Triggers: "agy", "antigravity", "AGY evidence".

Run one caller-supplied Codex command non-interactively and capture evidence. Triggers: "run Codex headless", "capture Codex evidence".

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Audit project dependencies for vulnerabilities, outdated packages, license conflicts, and supply chain risks — then provide actionable remediation strategies.

Refactor provided code for cleanliness, maintainability, and alignment with SOLID principles and modern best practices — no over-engineering.

Analyze and remediate technical debt — inventory debt items, score by impact, and produce a prioritized remediation plan with estimated effort.

Orchestrate comprehensive multi-dimensional code review using specialized review agents across architecture, security, performance, testing, and best practices

Enhance a pull request with a generated description, review checklist, risk assessment, and test coverage report

Execute tasks from a track's implementation plan following TDD workflow

Manage track lifecycle: archive, restore, delete, rename, and cleanup

Create a new track with specification and phased implementation plan

Git-aware undo by logical work unit (track, phase, or task)

Initialize project with Conductor artifacts (product definition, tech stack, workflow, style guides)

Display project status, active tracks, and next actions

Restore saved project context and decisions to resume a session

Save project context, decisions, and progress for a later session

Build features guided by data insights, A/B testing, and continuous measurement

Design and implement batch and streaming data pipelines with ingestion, orchestration, dbt transformations, data quality checks, and monitoring

Reduce cloud costs across AWS, Azure, and GCP through rightsizing, reserved and spot capacity, storage tuning, and cost monitoring

Migration monitoring, CDC, and observability infrastructure

SQL database migrations with zero-downtime strategies for PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server

AI-assisted smart debugging — parse error messages, stack traces, and failure patterns to identify root causes and produce a fix with automated observability steps.

Audit project dependencies for vulnerabilities, outdated packages, license conflicts, and supply chain risks — then provide actionable remediation strategies.

Build AI Agents like playing LEGOs. Everything is a Plugin.

The coding agent that answers to you, your model, your machine, your rules.

CI-native agent CLI tool for deterministic pipeline gating.

Local-first cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code / agents: multi-agent, Git worktrees, code diffs, skill marketplace, multi-model, Computer Use, tas…

Local-first visual generation runtime and studio for people and coding agents, with reproducible image and video workflows across multiple providers.

A token-efficient MCP server for safe, line-oriented text file editing with partial reads, hash-based conflict detection, and atomic multi-file operations.

Open-source, evidence-driven MCP server for RTL simulation debugging: correlate VCS/Xcelium logs, VCD/FSDB waveforms, SystemVerilog/UVM source, hierarchy, and c…

runs anywhere. uses anything

One macOS app for Claude Code, Codex, and every agent runtime you use — scheduled runs, global hotkey launcher, per-run git worktrees, one review board.

Soul-driven AI agent with permission-hardened tools, token budgets, and multi-channel access. Runs 24/7 from CLI or Telegram.

Email, SMS & phone-call infrastructure for AI agents — send and receive real email and text messages, and place agent-driven outbound voice calls, all programma…

55 MCP tools to drive the Unity Editor from any MCP-compatible AI agent — scenes, GameObjects, prefabs, assets, tests, and builds. OpenClaw gateway included for…

Google Ads MCP + Meta Ads MCP + GA4 in one server for Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor & n8n — 250+ tools, hosted remote MCP, OAuth login, no API keys. By Ryze AI.

Claude Code & Codex 本地 token 追踪 — 状态栏（Codex 业界首创伪 statusline）、GitHub 风格热力图、多模型成本分析。 | Local token tracker for Claude Code & Codex — status line (industry-first…

Empower the Shell to think. Evolve Operations.

🤖 A full-stack Agent Chat Runtime for pre-production validation, built with act, TypeScript, and LangGraph JS combining streaming, multimodal, HITL, and tools…

Cerul — video memory infrastructure for AI products. SDKs, CLI, MCP, and developer integrations.

Stealth headless browser for AI agents — bypass Cloudflare, bot detection, and anti-scraping. Drop-in Puppeteer/Playwright replacement.

Web research for your agents with smart and safe tooling + knowledge store

FuXi is a fast, self-contained AI coding agent that lives in your terminal — edit code, run commands, and drive tools, with cost-aware routing across LLM provid…