LLM Mart Basic

Use when auditing the developer-facing surface of a CLI, SDK, library, or package: API contracts, errors, public types, onboarding, and config.

Use when recent resolved feedback may reveal a broader recurring defect pattern across the project surface. Not for source-level feedback collection: use feedback-sweep.

Use when one named review viewpoint must run fix cycles until a fresh reviewer finds nothing. Not for multi-viewpoint review or remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when the user invokes this skill to generate targeted questions proving the author understands the change's codebase effect. Not for reviewing the change: use review.

Use when asked to review a pull request, examine code changes, find bugs, or audit a branch, in standard or depth mode. Not for an iterative review-and-fix loop: use audit-project.

Use when the user wants a per-finding visual walk through a diff or PR. Not for written review reports: use review. Not for codebase tours: use show-me.

Use when implementation must be checked against an authoritative specification, or during PR review for spec drift against checked-in specs. Not for spec updates: use spec-driven-implementation.

Use when the user runs /browser-qa for report-only QA results without entering a fix loop. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when asked to reproduce, profile, or verify CLI/TUI behavior. Produces a deterministic transcript or profile proof with session cleanup. Not for CLI design advice, use cli-for-agents.

Use when asked to verify or reproduce browser or Electron UI behavior with before-and-after evidence and no leftover processes. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when asked to prove coverage, find missing cases, or enumerate state, decision, requirement, or behavior space. Not for round-based or single-property tests: use askme, property-test-authoring.

Use when a complete product needs production-like acceptance evidence against documented acceptance criteria. Not for single-component evaluation or evaluation without documented criteria.

Use when verification is looping, would re-run untouched code, or duplicates an established proof. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

Use when a test surface needs behavior-guarding coverage raised to a configured target with mutation kill evidence. Not for line-coverage inflation without mutation proof.

Use when asked to initialize, scope, estimate, configure, validate, or optimize a mewt, muton, or mutation testing campaign before execution. Writes the TOML config. Not for running it: use the mewt CLI.

Use when a mutation campaign leaves surviving mutants needing triage. Classifies each as false-positive, missing-test, genotoxic, or removable. Not for setup: use mutation-campaign-configuration.

Use when a product surface must be tested against extreme or hostile worlds. Not for design disputes: use possible-worlds. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when property-based testing, theorem proving, or formal proof tactics require zero unproven properties. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Operate explicit orchestrator, implementer, validator, and scribe roles through a caller-selected agent runtime. Triggers: "agent-native factory", "role-shaped agent panes", "persistent workers".

Use an explicitly selected AGY runtime for one provided packet or fresh validator context. Triggers: "agy", "antigravity", "AGY evidence".

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Iniciar planificación de archivos estilo Manus. Crear task_plan.md, findings.md, progress.md para tareas complejas.

Bridge Claude Code's /goal to the active plan. Derives a goal condition from task_plan.md and invokes /goal so Claude keeps working until the plan is complete. Available since v2.38.0.

Run a planning-aware cadence with Claude Code's /loop. Default tick checks plan status, runs check-complete, nudges progress.md update if stalled. Available since v2.38.0.

启动 Manus 风格的文件规划。为复杂任务创建 task_plan.md、findings.md、progress.md。

啟動 Manus 風格的檔案規劃。為複雜任務建立 task_plan.md、findings.md、progress.md。

Start Manus-style file-based planning. Creates task_plan.md, findings.md, progress.md for complex tasks.

Short alias for /plan. Starts Manus-style file-based planning: task_plan.md, findings.md, progress.md. Available since v3.0.0.

Implements Manus-style file-based planning for complex tasks. Creates task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md. Use when starting complex multi-step tasks, research projects, or any task requiring >5 tool calls. Now with automatic session recovery after /clear

Show current planning status at a glance - phases, progress, and any logged errors.

Run three-agent adversarial analysis -- advocate builds the case, adversary challenges it, judicial analyst synthesizes

Structured pre-execution briefing session -- collects case context through specialist panel, builds execution plan, supports resume and depth control

Analyze cantonal law for all 26 Swiss cantons -- cantonal court decisions, cantonal legislation, procedural specifics, and interaction with federal law

Validate, format, and look up Swiss legal citations including BGE/ATF/DTF decisions and statutory references

Create a reusable custom workflow by combining BetterCallClaude agents. Interview-based: pick agents, order them, define the output. Saved for future use with /bettercallclaude:workflow.

Analyze Swiss legal documents -- identify legal issues, extract key clauses, verify citations, and assess compliance

Diagnose MCP server connectivity — tests each server, reports status and impact in plain language, suggests fixes for issues.

Draft Swiss legal documents including contracts (OR), court submissions (ZPO), and legal opinions (Gutachten) with multi-lingual support

Force Federal Law Mode for Swiss federal legal analysis, overriding cantonal auto-detection

Show complete BetterCallClaude command reference, available agents, skills, and usage examples

Execute the BetterCallClaude 5-step Swiss legal framework: intake → research → strategy → adversarial → draft. A complete end-to-end pipeline for any Swiss legal matter, from document analysis through final legal output.

The fastest way to put Volcengine Ark in your terminal and your AI agent — go from prompt to generated media, multimodal answer, or deployed endpoint in a sin…

本地私有、开源的自进化跨平台 AI 内容发现 Agent：先理解你，再主动从 B站、小红书、抖音、YouTube、X、知乎、Reddit、微博等平台与开放 Web 寻找内容。（支持 deepseek harness 插件） | Local-first open-source cross-platform AI cont…

Persistent memory for AI coding agents — one verified kb_search replaces the grep/find/ls orientation loop. Cross-repo, CPU-only, zero token spend.

AI 时代的伯克希尔：基于 Claude Code / Codex 的价值投资研究框架。巴菲特·芒格·段永平·李录四大师方法论 + 多Agent并行研究。| AI-era Berkshire: a value investing research framework built for Claude Code / Co…

The batteries-included, No-Code FinOps automation platform, with the AI you trust.

Open-source 3D AI agent framework — GLB/glTF avatars with LLM brains, memory, emotions, and autonomous payments. MCP server · x402 · Solana/EVM · Three.js. Embe…

XLSX parser for LLMs, RAG, LangChain, LangGraph, CrewAI, Claude, MCP — turns Excel (.xlsx) into citation-ready JSON with formulas, charts, dependency graphs, an…

Hermes-Relay — Your Hermes AI agent, in your pocket — chat, voice, and control.

A minimalist, terminal-native coding agent written in C.

AI-powered OSINT agent with interactive REPL, MCP server, and CLI. 19 tools. Works with Claude, GPT-4, or local models. For authorized security research only.

AI pair programming in your terminal — one static binary, sub-ms startup, any model

Where data access meets operational intelligence

Build your own security agents. Open-source framework for agents with live, read-only access to your infrastructure, with no path to widen it. Reasons across AW…

Multi-workspace terminal aggregator with Claude Code AI integration

Go implementation of AI coding agent

Harness engineering beginner tutorial, from 0 to 1

Generate images directly in DeepSeek Harness chats

A smarter, self-hosted AI assistant — multi-user, multi-agent.

Turn any research paper into a commercialization report — 6 AI agents, TRL/MRL scoring, patent landscape, market intelligence, verified citations. DeepSeek / Op…

Power BI CLI - semantic models (.NET TOM) and PBIR reports for token-efficient AI agent usage, built for Claude Code