LLM Mart Basic

Use when auditing the developer-facing surface of a CLI, SDK, library, or package: API contracts, errors, public types, onboarding, and config.

Use when recent resolved feedback may reveal a broader recurring defect pattern across the project surface. Not for source-level feedback collection: use feedback-sweep.

Use when one named review viewpoint must run fix cycles until a fresh reviewer finds nothing. Not for multi-viewpoint review or remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when the user invokes this skill to generate targeted questions proving the author understands the change's codebase effect. Not for reviewing the change: use review.

Use when asked to review a pull request, examine code changes, find bugs, or audit a branch, in standard or depth mode. Not for an iterative review-and-fix loop: use audit-project.

Use when the user wants a per-finding visual walk through a diff or PR. Not for written review reports: use review. Not for codebase tours: use show-me.

Use when implementation must be checked against an authoritative specification, or during PR review for spec drift against checked-in specs. Not for spec updates: use spec-driven-implementation.

Use when the user runs /browser-qa for report-only QA results without entering a fix loop. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when asked to reproduce, profile, or verify CLI/TUI behavior. Produces a deterministic transcript or profile proof with session cleanup. Not for CLI design advice, use cli-for-agents.

Use when asked to verify or reproduce browser or Electron UI behavior with before-and-after evidence and no leftover processes. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when asked to prove coverage, find missing cases, or enumerate state, decision, requirement, or behavior space. Not for round-based or single-property tests: use askme, property-test-authoring.

Use when a complete product needs production-like acceptance evidence against documented acceptance criteria. Not for single-component evaluation or evaluation without documented criteria.

Use when verification is looping, would re-run untouched code, or duplicates an established proof. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

Use when a test surface needs behavior-guarding coverage raised to a configured target with mutation kill evidence. Not for line-coverage inflation without mutation proof.

Use when asked to initialize, scope, estimate, configure, validate, or optimize a mewt, muton, or mutation testing campaign before execution. Writes the TOML config. Not for running it: use the mewt CLI.

Use when a mutation campaign leaves surviving mutants needing triage. Classifies each as false-positive, missing-test, genotoxic, or removable. Not for setup: use mutation-campaign-configuration.

Use when a product surface must be tested against extreme or hostile worlds. Not for design disputes: use possible-worlds. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when property-based testing, theorem proving, or formal proof tactics require zero unproven properties. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Operate explicit orchestrator, implementer, validator, and scribe roles through a caller-selected agent runtime. Triggers: "agent-native factory", "role-shaped agent panes", "persistent workers".

Use an explicitly selected AGY runtime for one provided packet or fresh validator context. Triggers: "agy", "antigravity", "AGY evidence".

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

为当前项目部署或检查 ZCode 网文 Skills、Commands、Hooks 与 AGENTS.md。

短篇网文拆文，分析故事核、情绪线、结构和反转。

短篇网文扫榜，分析盐言、七猫、黑岩、点众等平台趋势。

短篇网文写作，从目标情绪、反转和小节大纲到正文。

网文工具箱路由入口。根据模糊意图分发到合适的网文 Skill。

Review the codebase across critical quality axes

Workflow-based 8-axis codebase review — per-axis sub-workflows, adversarial verify, deterministic scoring + rendering

Run a multi-model code review on uncommitted changes or a described set of files

Create a structured, phased implementation plan for a feature or change in the coder_eval codebase, executable from a fresh session by /coder-eval-implement-plan

Implement an approved coder_eval plan phase by phase with risk-scaled per-phase review, then a final code review

Generate per-task review.json (summary + tags) for a completed run

Evolve skill files by integrating validated lessons from real usage

Initialize .autocontext/ in the current project for knowledge persistence

Interactively review and curate accumulated project lessons

First-run configuration for the autocontext plugin

Show knowledge stats for the current project

Create event materials (flyers, posters, signage) with your organization's branding

Create an HTML email newsletter with your organization's branding

Create a single-page fact sheet or program overview

Launch interactive preview for document editing

Implementation of Podlite markup language

Open-source AI video workbench. Bring any model or your local ComfyUI, and let Claude Code / Codex / Cursor direct it over MCP — storyboard, references, generat…

《深入理解 AI Agent：设计原理与工程实践》（李博杰 著）开源主仓库：全书正文、编译版 PDF 与按章配套代码

Distilly — Distill how they think into reusable Skills for any Agent or Bot. Formerly Colleague Skill（原同事 Skill）.

本地优先的类飞书 Markdown 编辑器,内置可审改的 AI 助手 | Local-first WYSIWYG Markdown editor with a reviewable AI agent

A lightweight all-in-one terminal with 20+ protocols — SSH, RDP, SFTP, databases, Kubernetes and more. With a built-in autonomous AI Agent that plans and runs m…

一款专注于桌宠方向的AIAgent。特点是一键安装、功能齐全、极低开销、完全暴露上下文、全功能插件化、AI自主插件开发、永久唯一会话、类游戏引擎交互策略。具有极高的扩展性和拟人程度上限，非常适合想长期培养和自定义需求高的用户。

Control Gmail, Google Calendar, Docs, Sheets, Slides, Chat, Forms, Tasks, Search & Drive with AI - Comprehensive Google Workspace MCP Server & CLI Tool

一个先接住情绪、再分析关系并给出可执行策略的 Codex 恋爱军师，内置心理、法律、社会、人文、哲学、婚姻家庭与性学知识库，支持多元关系。

AI-powered SRE platform — read-only infrastructure diagnostics with deep investigation, security governance, and team collaboration

An open-source AI desktop companion inspired by Cyrene, combining immersive Chat, personalized long-term memory, and an agentic Work mode.

A local-first AI agent with persistent memory, emotional intelligence, and a peer-to-peer skills economy.

The open-source, multi-agent alternative to Claude Tag. @ any agent, wherever work happens, your agents work alongside your team and each other, learning as the…

Simple LLM service identification - translate IP:Port to Ollama, vLLM, LiteLLM, or 60+ other AI services in seconds

🔥 Official Firecrawl MCP Server - Adds powerful web scraping and search to Cursor, Claude and any other LLM clients.

Claude in Chrome, reverse-engineered and open-source. No domain blocklist. Any Chromium browser. Same 18 MCP tools, same performance.

Agent-native flight & hotel search and booking — MCP server, CLI, and Python/JS SDKs. Hundreds of airlines plus the major booking sites, with per-flight reliabi…

Open-source desktop AI agent for tools, files, knowledge, workflows, and real deliverables.

Open-source AI job search: scan job portals, evaluate listings into a structured A-H report with a global 1-5 score, tailor your CV, track applications — runs l…

Privacy-first Codex skill for discovering, validating, completing, and tracking job applications