LLM Mart Basic

Use when recent resolved feedback may reveal a broader recurring defect pattern across the project surface. Not for source-level feedback collection: use feedback-sweep.

Use when one named review viewpoint must run fix cycles until a fresh reviewer finds nothing. Not for multi-viewpoint review or remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when the user invokes this skill to generate targeted questions proving the author understands the change's codebase effect. Not for reviewing the change: use review.

Use when asked to review a pull request, examine code changes, find bugs, or audit a branch, in standard or depth mode. Not for an iterative review-and-fix loop: use audit-project.

Use when the user wants a per-finding visual walk through a diff or PR. Not for written review reports: use review. Not for codebase tours: use show-me.

Use when implementation must be checked against an authoritative specification, or during PR review for spec drift against checked-in specs. Not for spec updates: use spec-driven-implementation.

Use when the user runs /browser-qa for report-only QA results without entering a fix loop. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when asked to reproduce, profile, or verify CLI/TUI behavior. Produces a deterministic transcript or profile proof with session cleanup. Not for CLI design advice, use cli-for-agents.

Use when asked to verify or reproduce browser or Electron UI behavior with before-and-after evidence and no leftover processes. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when asked to prove coverage, find missing cases, or enumerate state, decision, requirement, or behavior space. Not for round-based or single-property tests: use askme, property-test-authoring.

Use when a complete product needs production-like acceptance evidence against documented acceptance criteria. Not for single-component evaluation or evaluation without documented criteria.

Use when verification is looping, would re-run untouched code, or duplicates an established proof. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

Use when a test surface needs behavior-guarding coverage raised to a configured target with mutation kill evidence. Not for line-coverage inflation without mutation proof.

Use when asked to initialize, scope, estimate, configure, validate, or optimize a mewt, muton, or mutation testing campaign before execution. Writes the TOML config. Not for running it: use the mewt CLI.

Use when a mutation campaign leaves surviving mutants needing triage. Classifies each as false-positive, missing-test, genotoxic, or removable. Not for setup: use mutation-campaign-configuration.

Use when a product surface must be tested against extreme or hostile worlds. Not for design disputes: use possible-worlds. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when property-based testing, theorem proving, or formal proof tactics require zero unproven properties. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Operate explicit orchestrator, implementer, validator, and scribe roles through a caller-selected agent runtime. Triggers: "agent-native factory", "role-shaped agent panes", "persistent workers".

Use an explicitly selected AGY runtime for one provided packet or fresh validator context. Triggers: "agy", "antigravity", "AGY evidence".

Run one caller-supplied Codex command non-interactively and capture evidence. Triggers: "run Codex headless", "capture Codex evidence".

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

为当前项目部署或检查 ZCode 网文 Skills、Commands、Hooks 与 AGENTS.md。

短篇网文拆文，分析故事核、情绪线、结构和反转。

短篇网文扫榜，分析盐言、七猫、黑岩、点众等平台趋势。

短篇网文写作，从目标情绪、反转和小节大纲到正文。

网文工具箱路由入口。根据模糊意图分发到合适的网文 Skill。

Review the codebase across critical quality axes

Workflow-based 8-axis codebase review — per-axis sub-workflows, adversarial verify, deterministic scoring + rendering

Run a multi-model code review on uncommitted changes or a described set of files

Create a structured, phased implementation plan for a feature or change in the coder_eval codebase, executable from a fresh session by /coder-eval-implement-plan

Implement an approved coder_eval plan phase by phase with risk-scaled per-phase review, then a final code review

Generate per-task review.json (summary + tags) for a completed run

Evolve skill files by integrating validated lessons from real usage

Initialize .autocontext/ in the current project for knowledge persistence

Interactively review and curate accumulated project lessons

First-run configuration for the autocontext plugin

Show knowledge stats for the current project

Create event materials (flyers, posters, signage) with your organization's branding

Create an HTML email newsletter with your organization's branding

Create a single-page fact sheet or program overview

Launch interactive preview for document editing

A systematic AI Agent development tutorial covering LLM agents, RAG, tool use, memory systems, multi-agent systems, LangChain, LangGraph, MCP, and agentic RL.｜从…

Convert Files / Folders / GitHub Repos Into AI / LLM-ready Files

Open-source, local-first conversational AI video editor with a professional multi-track timeline, Agent Skills, MCP integration, and Remotion rendering.

Maintainer-governed agent for evidence-backed open-source contribution proposals

A Claude Code skill by Hao (駱君昊) that learns your Facebook voice and auto-posts to FB / IG / Threads / X with a 14-day content calendar. Mega-viral validated: 8…

Local-first AI agent workspace for coding, writing, design, research, and automation — one runtime for desktop GUI and TUI.

Open-source AI Agent platform for teams. Your agents don't just chat — they read files, run code, call APIs, and deliver results.

Give your AI agent eyes for PDFs — structured text, tables, OCR, visual evidence, and page-level citations via MCP. Native Rust, local-first.

Real-world AI penetration testing engineer for authorized assessments — built-in cloud module covering AWS/Azure/GCP + Aliyun/Tencent/Huawei clouds. Built on Cl…

OpenGUI is an Android GUI agent framework for phone-use AI that can see, plan, and operate real mobile apps through the GUI.

Tinybot is a lightweight personal AI Agent that is constantly evolving

Goink 桌面 AI 小说创作助手，对话式写作 + 自动状态追踪 + 本地语义搜索。跨平台开箱即用。AI Agent Novel Generator.

Pluggable DeepSeek-colored TUI for DeepSeek Harness

Entity-level git merge driver. Resolves false conflicts git invents when independent agents edit the same file. ~95% reduction vs. line-based merge.

Percho: Minimalist desktop GUI for the Pi coding agent — the same engine as the Pi CLI, in a clean visual interface. Multi-session chat, visual tool approvals,…

Run Claude Code, Codex & Gemini in parallel on Windows & macOS — git worktree fan-out with atomic hunk adoption, approval gates, reboot-surviving sessions

A hierarchical memory framework for personalized presentation agents. Try it at memslides.com.

Real-time multimodal desktop agent evolving toward a persistent AI OS interface (0.1 α).

clawdcursor compiles whatever's on screen into one UI map — accessibility tree and OCR fused into stable, addressable elements, with a screenshot only when need…

Repeatable agentic engineering. The workflow layer that turns AI coding agents into a disciplined factory: durable specs, fresh-context workers, adversarial cro…